[libc++] Refactor tests for shared_mutex and shared_timed_mutex (#100783)

This makes the tests less flaky and also makes a few other refactorings
like using traits instead of .compile.fail.cpp test

[libc++] Refactor tests for shared_mutex and shared_timed_mutex (#100783)

This makes the tests less flaky and also makes a few other refactorings
like using traits instead of .compile.fail.cpp tests.

show more ...

[libc++] Remove availability annotations which can never be triggered (#69226)

According to https://developer.apple.com/support/xcode/, quite a few of
our availability macros don't do anything anym

[libc++] Remove availability annotations which can never be triggered (#69226)

According to https://developer.apple.com/support/xcode/, quite a few of
our availability macros don't do anything anymore, so we might as well
remove them to clean up the code a bit.

show more ...

[libc++] Use named Lit features to flag back-deployment XFAILs

Instead of writing something like `XFAIL: use_system_cxx_lib && target=...`
to XFAIL back-deployment tests, introduce named Lit feature

[libc++] Use named Lit features to flag back-deployment XFAILs

Instead of writing something like `XFAIL: use_system_cxx_lib && target=...`
to XFAIL back-deployment tests, introduce named Lit features like
`availability-shared_mutex-missing` to represent those. This makes the
XFAIL annotations leaner, and solves the problem of XFAIL comments
potentially getting out of sync. This would also make it easier for
another vendor to add their own annotations to the test suite by simply
changing how the feature is defined for their OS releases, instead
of having to modify hundreds of tests to add repetitive annotations.

This doesn't touch *all* annotations -- only annotations that were widely
duplicated are given named features (e.g. when filesystem or shared_mutex
were introduced). I still think it probably doesn't make sense to have a
named feature for every single fix we make to the dylib.

This is in essence a revert of 2659663, but since then the test suite
has changed significantly. Back when I did 2659663, the configuration
files we have for the test suite right now were being bootstrapped and
it wasn't clear how to provide these features for back-deployment in
that context. Since then, we have a streamlined way of defining these
features in `features.py` and that doesn't impact the ability for a
configuration file to stay minimal.

The original motivation for this change was that I am about to propose
a change that would touch essentially all XFAIL annotations for back-deployment
in the test suite, and this greatly reduces the number of lines changed
by that upcoming change, in addition to making the test suite generally
better.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146359

show more ...

[libc++] Granularize __mutex_base

This also updates the moved code to the current style. (i.e. `_VSTD` -> `std`, `_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY` -> `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI`, clang-format).

Reviewed By:

[libc++] Granularize __mutex_base

This also updates the moved code to the current style. (i.e. `_VSTD` -> `std`, `_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY` -> `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI`, clang-format).

Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc, EricWF

Spies: arichardson, libcxx-commits, mikhail.ramalho

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146228

show more ...

[runtimes] Rename various libcpp-has-no-XYZ Lit features to just no-XYZ

Since those features are general properties of the environment, it makes
sense to use them from libc++abi too, and so the name

[runtimes] Rename various libcpp-has-no-XYZ Lit features to just no-XYZ

Since those features are general properties of the environment, it makes
sense to use them from libc++abi too, and so the name libcpp-has-no-xxx
doesn't make sense.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126482

show more ...

[runtimes] Remove support for GCC-style 32 bit multilib builds

This patch removes the ability to build the runtimes in the 32 bit
multilib configuration, i.e. using -m32. Instead of doing this, one

[runtimes] Remove support for GCC-style 32 bit multilib builds

This patch removes the ability to build the runtimes in the 32 bit
multilib configuration, i.e. using -m32. Instead of doing this, one
should cross-compile the runtimes for the appropriate target triple,
like we do for all other triples.

As it stands, -m32 has several issues, which all seem to be related to
the fact that it's not well supported by the operating systems that
libc++ support. The simplest path towards fixing this is to remove
support for the configuration, which is also the best course of action
if there is little interest for keeping that configuration. If there
is a desire to keep this configuration around, we'll need to do some
work to figure out the underlying issues and fix them.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114473

show more ...

[libc++] Temporarily mark tests as UNSUPPORTED to get the CI green

After recent changes to the Docker image, all hell broke loose and the
CI started failing. This patch marks a few tests as unsuppor

[libc++] Temporarily mark tests as UNSUPPORTED to get the CI green

After recent changes to the Docker image, all hell broke loose and the
CI started failing. This patch marks a few tests as unsupported until
we can figure out what the issues are and fix them.

In the future, it would be ideal if the nodes could pick up the Dockerfile
present in the revision being tested, which would allow us to test changes
to the Dockerfile in the CI, like we do for all other code changes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112737

show more ...

[runtimes] Simplify how we specify XFAIL & friends based on the triple

Now that Lit supports regular expressions inside XFAIL & friends, it is
much easier to write Lit annotations based on the tripl

[runtimes] Simplify how we specify XFAIL & friends based on the triple

Now that Lit supports regular expressions inside XFAIL & friends, it is
much easier to write Lit annotations based on the triple.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104747

show more ...

[libc++] Move handling of the target triple to the DSL

This fixes a long standing issue where the triple is not always set
consistently in all configurations. This change also moves the
back-deploym

[libc++] Move handling of the target triple to the DSL

This fixes a long standing issue where the triple is not always set
consistently in all configurations. This change also moves the
back-deployment Lit features to using the proper target triple
instead of using something ad-hoc.

This will be necessary for using from scratch Lit configuration files
in both normal testing and back-deployment testing.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102012

show more ...

[libc++] Introduce an indirection to create threads in the test suite

We create threads using std::thread in various places in the test suite.
However, the usual std::thread constructor may not work

[libc++] Introduce an indirection to create threads in the test suite

We create threads using std::thread in various places in the test suite.
However, the usual std::thread constructor may not work on all platforms,
e.g. on platforms where passing a stack size is required to create a thread.

This commit introduces a simple indirection that makes it easier to tweak
how threads are created inside the test suite on various platforms. Note
that tests that are purposefully calling std::thread's constructor directly
(e.g. because that is what they're testing) were not modified.

show more ...

[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite

C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
ju

[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite

C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.

This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926

show more ...

[libc++] Add UNSUPPORTED markup for shared_mutex and shared_timed_mutex tests

The tests were previously disabled entirely whenever availability markup
was enabled. Instead, enable the tests but add

[libc++] Add UNSUPPORTED markup for shared_mutex and shared_timed_mutex tests

The tests were previously disabled entirely whenever availability markup
was enabled. Instead, enable the tests but add the proper UNSUPPORTED
markup.

show more ...

[libc++] Drop custom support for flaky tests from libc++ test suite

Instead, use the builtin support in lit. This makes the libc++ custom
test format slightly closer to the builtin ShTest format in

[libc++] Drop custom support for flaky tests from libc++ test suite

Instead, use the builtin support in lit. This makes the libc++ custom
test format slightly closer to the builtin ShTest format in behavior.

show more ...

[libc++] Mark more try_lock tests as possibly flaky.

These tests check that an operations happens within a specified
deadline, which causes flaky failures on slow machines or machines
under heavy lo

[libc++] Mark more try_lock tests as possibly flaky.

These tests check that an operations happens within a specified
deadline, which causes flaky failures on slow machines or machines
under heavy load.

By adding the // FLAKY_TEST. tag it allows the test suite to
retry or ignore the tests

show more ...

Add include for 'test_macros.h' to all the tests that were missing them. Thanks to Zoe for the (big, but simple) patch. NFC intended.

llvm-svn: 362252

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".

Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:

In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:

self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']

Run the tests and they all fail.

Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).

Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.

The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.

The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:

https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed

This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.

Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.

<rdar://problem/47754795>

Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF

Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624

llvm-svn: 353086

show more ...

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351648

show more ...

[libcxx] [test] Consistently list "c++98, c++03" in chronological order. NFC.

llvm-svn: 310155

Change #ifdefs in test to UNSUPPORTED. No functionality change in the tests

llvm-svn: 239562

Move test into test/std subdirectory.

llvm-svn: 224658