[libc++] Optimize string operator[] for known large inputs (#69500)

If we know that index is larger than SSO size, we know that we can't be
in SSO case, and should access the pointer. This removes

[libc++] Optimize string operator[] for known large inputs (#69500)

If we know that index is larger than SSO size, we know that we can't be
in SSO case, and should access the pointer. This removes extra check
from operator[] for inputs known at compile time to be larger than SSO.

show more ...

[libc++] Apply clang formatting to all string unit tests

This applies clang-format to the std::string unit tests in preparation
for landing https://reviews.llvm.org/D140550.

Differential Revision:

[libc++] Apply clang formatting to all string unit tests

This applies clang-format to the std::string unit tests in preparation
for landing https://reviews.llvm.org/D140550.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140612

show more ...

[libc++][NFC] Remove some of the code duplication in the string tests

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, huixie90

Spies: huixie90, libcxx-commits, arphaman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.or

[libc++][NFC] Remove some of the code duplication in the string tests

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, huixie90

Spies: huixie90, libcxx-commits, arphaman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131856

show more ...

[libcxx][AIX] Switch build compiler to clang

This patch switches the build compiler for AIX from ibm-clang to clang. ibm-clang++_r has `-pthread` by default, but clang for AIX doesn't, so `-pthread`

[libcxx][AIX] Switch build compiler to clang

This patch switches the build compiler for AIX from ibm-clang to clang. ibm-clang++_r has `-pthread` by default, but clang for AIX doesn't, so `-pthread` had to be added to the test config. A bunch of tests now pass, so the `XFAIL` was removed. This patch also switch the build to use the visibility support available in clang-15 to control symbols exported by the shared library (AIX traditionally uses explicit export lists for this purpose).

Reviewed By: #libc, #libc_abi, daltenty, #libunwind, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127470

show more ...

[libc++] Implement P0980R1 (constexpr std::string)

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Spies: daltenty, sdasgup3, ldionne, arichardson, MTC, ChuanqiXu, mehdi_amini, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache,

[libc++] Implement P0980R1 (constexpr std::string)

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Spies: daltenty, sdasgup3, ldionne, arichardson, MTC, ChuanqiXu, mehdi_amini, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, aartbik, liufengdb, stephenneuendorffer, Joonsoo, grosul1, Kayjukh, jurahul, msifontes, tatianashp, rdzhabarov, teijeong, cota, dcaballe, Chia-hungDuan, wrengr, wenzhicui, arphaman, Mordante, miscco, Quuxplusone, smeenai, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110598

show more ...

[libc++] Prepare string.{access, capacity, cons} tests for constexpr

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: libcxx-commits, arphaman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119123

[libc++] Split off debug tests that were missed by ce1365f8f7e into test/libcxx

Also, some tests had multiple death tests in them, so split them into
separate tests instead. The second death test wo

[libc++] Split off debug tests that were missed by ce1365f8f7e into test/libcxx

Also, some tests had multiple death tests in them, so split them into
separate tests instead. The second death test would obviously never
get run, because the first one would kill the program before.

show more ...

Add include for 'test_macros.h' to all the tests that were missing them. Thanks to Zoe for the (big, but simple) patch. NFC intended.

llvm-svn: 362252

Mark 'front()' and 'back()' as noexcept for array/deque/string/string_view. These are just rebranded 'operator[]', and should be noexcept like it is.

llvm-svn: 356435

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".

Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:

In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:

self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']

Run the tests and they all fail.

Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).

Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.

The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.

The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:

https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed

This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.

Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.

<rdar://problem/47754795>

Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF

Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624

llvm-svn: 353086

show more ...

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351648

show more ...

[libcxx] [test] D27025: Fix MSVC warning C4389 "signed/unsigned mismatch", part 12/12.

Various changes:

test/std/algorithms/alg.sorting/alg.merge/inplace_merge.pass.cpp
This is comparing value_type

[libcxx] [test] D27025: Fix MSVC warning C4389 "signed/unsigned mismatch", part 12/12.

Various changes:

test/std/algorithms/alg.sorting/alg.merge/inplace_merge.pass.cpp
This is comparing value_type to unsigned. value_type is sometimes int and sometimes struct S (implicitly constructible from int).
static_cast<value_type>(unsigned) silences the warning and doesn't do anything bad (as the values in question are small).

test/std/algorithms/alg.sorting/alg.nth.element/nth_element_comp.pass.cpp
This is comparing an int remote-element to size_t. The values in question are small and non-negative,
so either type is fine. I think that converting int to size_t is marginally better here than the reverse.

test/std/containers/sequences/deque/deque.cons/size.pass.cpp
DefaultOnly::count is int (and non-negative). When comparing to unsigned, use static_cast<unsigned>.

test/std/strings/basic.string/string.access/index.pass.cpp
We're comparing char to '0' through '9', but formed with the type size_t. Add static_cast<char>.

test/std/utilities/template.bitset/bitset.cons/ull_ctor.pass.cpp
Include <cstddef> for pedantic correctness (this test was already mentioning std::size_t).

"v[i] == (i & 1)" was comparing bool to size_t. Saying "v[i] == ((i & 1) != 0)" smashes the RHS to bool.

llvm-svn: 288749

show more ...

Replace __cplusplus comparisons and dialect __has_feature checks with TEST_STD_VER.

This is a huge cleanup that helps make the libc++ test suite more portable.
Patch from STL@microsoft.com. Thanks S

Replace __cplusplus comparisons and dialect __has_feature checks with TEST_STD_VER.

This is a huge cleanup that helps make the libc++ test suite more portable.
Patch from STL@microsoft.com. Thanks STL!

llvm-svn: 272716

show more ...

Move test into test/std subdirectory.

llvm-svn: 224658