Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4
# f0ea888e 11-Apr-2024 Christopher Di Bella <cjdb@google.com>

[libcxx] applies changes regarding post-commit feedback to #75259 (#76534)

Some of the feedback was also relevant to other files, and has been
applied there too.


Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3
# b8cb1dc9 18-Aug-2022 Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com>

[libc++] Make <ranges> non-experimental

When we ship LLVM 16, <ranges> won't be considered experimental anymore.
We might as well do this sooner rather than later.

Differential Revision: https://re

[libc++] Make <ranges> non-experimental

When we ship LLVM 16, <ranges> won't be considered experimental anymore.
We might as well do this sooner rather than later.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132151

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1
# e06ca312 31-Mar-2022 Nikolas Klauser <nikolasklauser@berlin.de>

[libc++] Canonicalize the ranges results and their tests

Reviewed By: var-const, Mordante, #libc, ldionne

Spies: ldionne, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121435


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0
# d2baefae 12-Mar-2022 Joe Loser <joeloser93@gmail.com>

[libc++] Replace _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS with _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17. NFCI.

All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBC

[libc++] Replace _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS with _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17. NFCI.

All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init
# 53406fb6 01-Feb-2022 Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer@gmail.com>

[libc++] Guard much of std::ranges under _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES.

The logic here is that we are disabling *only* things in `std::ranges::`.
Everything in `std::` is permitted, including `de

[libc++] Guard much of std::ranges under _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES.

The logic here is that we are disabling *only* things in `std::ranges::`.
Everything in `std::` is permitted, including `default_sentinel`, `contiguous_iterator`,
`common_iterator`, `projected`, `swappable`, and so on. Then, we include
anything from `std::ranges::` that is required in order to make those things
work: `ranges::swap`, `ranges::swap_ranges`, `input_range`, `ranges::begin`,
`ranges::iter_move`, and so on. But then that's all. Everything else (including
notably all of the "views" and the `std::views` namespace itself) is still
locked up behind `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118736

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3
# 6322cb48 17-Jan-2022 Nikolas Klauser <nikolasklauser@berlin.de>

[libc++][test] test in_in_result convertible requirements

Currently it is not checked that operator in_in_result<II1, II2>() SFINAEs away properly

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: libcxx-commits

[libc++][test] test in_in_result convertible requirements

Currently it is not checked that operator in_in_result<II1, II2>() SFINAEs away properly

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117517

show more ...


# d3729bb3 14-Jan-2022 Nikolas Klauser <nikolasklauser@berlin.de>

[libc++][ranges] Add ranges::in_in_result

Add `std::ranges::in_in_result`

Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc

Spies: ldionne, libcxx-commits, mgorny

Differential Revision: https://reviews.l

[libc++][ranges] Add ranges::in_in_result

Add `std::ranges::in_in_result`

Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc

Spies: ldionne, libcxx-commits, mgorny

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116278

show more ...