[libc++][RFC] Always define internal feature test macros (#89178)

Currently, the library-internal feature test macros are only defined if
the feature is not available, and always have the prefix
`

[libc++][RFC] Always define internal feature test macros (#89178)

Currently, the library-internal feature test macros are only defined if
the feature is not available, and always have the prefix
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_`. This patch changes that, so that they are always
defined and have the prefix `_LIBCPP_HAS_` instead. This changes the
canonical use of these macros to `#if _LIBCPP_HAS_FEATURE`, which means
that using an undefined macro (e.g. due to a missing include) is
diagnosed now. While this is rather unlikely currently, a similar change
in `<__configuration/availability.h>` caught a few bugs. This also
improves readability, since it removes the double-negation of `#ifndef
_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_FEATURE`.

The current patch only touches the macros defined in `<__config>`. If
people are happy with this approach, I'll make a follow-up PR to also
change the macros defined in `<__config_site>`.

show more ...

[libc++] Split the monolithic __threading_support header (#79654)

The <__threading_support> header is a huge beast and it's really
difficult to navigate. I find myself struggling to find what I wan

[libc++] Split the monolithic __threading_support header (#79654)

The <__threading_support> header is a huge beast and it's really
difficult to navigate. I find myself struggling to find what I want
every time I have to open it, and I've been considering splitting it up
for years for that reason.

This patch aims not to contain any functional change. The various
implementations of the threading base are simply moved to separate
headers and then the individual headers are simplified in mechanical
ways. For example, we used to have redundant declarations of all the
functions at the top of `__threading_support`, and those are removed
since they are not needed anymore. The various #ifdefs are also
simplified and removed when they become unnecessary.

Finally, this patch adds documentation for the API we expect from any
threading implementation.

show more ...

[libc++] Format the code base (#74334)

This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmar

[libc++] Format the code base (#74334)

This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.

This patch was generated with:

find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
| grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
| grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
| grep -v 'README.txt' \
| grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
| grep -v '__config_site.in' \
| xargs clang-format -i

A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.

[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all

show more ...

[libc++] Rename _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI (#74095)

In preparation for running clang-format on the whole code base, we are
also removing mentions of the legacy _LIBCPP_INLIN

[libc++] Rename _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI (#74095)

In preparation for running clang-format on the whole code base, we are
also removing mentions of the legacy _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY macro in
favor of the newer _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI.

We're still leaving the definition of _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to avoid
creating needless breakage in case some older patches are checked-in
with mentions of the old macro. After we branch for LLVM 18, we can do
another pass to clean up remaining uses of the macro that might have
gotten introduced by mistake (if any) and remove the macro itself at the
same time. This is just a minor convenience to smooth out the transition
as much as possible.

See
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
for the clang-format proposal.

show more ...

[libc++] Handle threads-related .cpp files like we do all other source files (#71100)

Source files in libc++ are added to the CMake targets only if they are
required by the configuration. We do thi

[libc++] Handle threads-related .cpp files like we do all other source files (#71100)

Source files in libc++ are added to the CMake targets only if they are
required by the configuration. We do this pretty consistently for all
configurations like no-filesystem, no-random-device, etc. but we didn't
do it for no-threads. This patch makes this consistent for no-threads,
which is helpful in reducing the amount of work required to port libc++
to some platforms without threads.

Indeed, with the previous approach, several threads-related source files
would end up including headers that might fail to compile properly on
some platforms. This issue is sidestepped entirely by making the
approach for no-threads consistent with the other configurations.

show more ...

[libc++] Merge _LIBCPP_FUNC_VIS, _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS and _LIBCPP_EXCEPTION_ABI into _LIBCPP_EXPORTED_FROM_ABI

These macros are always defined identically, so we can simplify the code a bit by merging t

[libc++] Merge _LIBCPP_FUNC_VIS, _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS and _LIBCPP_EXCEPTION_ABI into _LIBCPP_EXPORTED_FROM_ABI

These macros are always defined identically, so we can simplify the code a bit by merging them.

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: libcxx-commits, krytarowski, smeenai

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152652

show more ...

[libc++] Replace `#include ""` with `<>` in libcxx/src/. NFCI.

Our best guess is that the two syntaxes should have exactly equivalent
effects, so, let's be consistent with what we do in libcxx/inclu

[libc++] Replace `#include ""` with `<>` in libcxx/src/. NFCI.

Our best guess is that the two syntaxes should have exactly equivalent
effects, so, let's be consistent with what we do in libcxx/include/.

I've left `#include "include/x.h"` and `#include "../y.h"` alone
because I'm less sure that they're interchangeable, and they aren't
inconsistent with libcxx/include/ because libcxx/include/ never
does that kind of thing.

Also, use the `_LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS/POP_MACROS` dance for `<__undef_macros>`,
even though it's technically unnecessary in a standalone .cpp file,
just so we have consistently one way to do it.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119561

show more ...

[runtimes][NFC] Remove filenames at the top of the license notice

We've stopped doing it in libc++ for a while now because these names
would end up rotting as we move things around and copy/paste st

[runtimes][NFC] Remove filenames at the top of the license notice

We've stopped doing it in libc++ for a while now because these names
would end up rotting as we move things around and copy/paste stuff.
This cleans up all the existing files so as to stop the spreading
as people copy-paste headers around.

show more ...

[libc++/abi] Replace uses of _NOEXCEPT in src/ by noexcept

We always build the libraries in a Standard mode that supports noexcept,
so there's no need to use the _NOEXCEPT macro.

Differential Revis

[libc++/abi] Replace uses of _NOEXCEPT in src/ by noexcept

We always build the libraries in a Standard mode that supports noexcept,
so there's no need to use the _NOEXCEPT macro.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97700

show more ...

[libc++][NFC] Remove excess trailing newlines from most files

Testing git commit access.

Fix PR27658 - Make ~mutex trivial when possible.

Currently std::mutex has a constexpr constructor, but a non-trivial
destruction.

The constexpr constructor is required to ensure the construction of

Fix PR27658 - Make ~mutex trivial when possible.

Currently std::mutex has a constexpr constructor, but a non-trivial
destruction.

The constexpr constructor is required to ensure the construction of a
mutex with static storage duration happens at compile time, during
constant initialization, and not during dynamic initialization.
This means that static mutex's are always initialized and can be used
safely during dynamic initialization without the "static initialization
order fiasco".

A trivial destructor is important for similar reasons. If a mutex is
used during dynamic initialization it might also be used during program
termination. If a static mutex has a non-trivial destructor it will be
invoked during termination. This can introduce the "static
deinitialization order fiasco".

Additionally, function-local statics emit a guard variable around
non-trivially destructible types. This results in horrible codegen and
adds a runtime cost to every call to that function. non-local static's
also result in slightly worse codegen but it's not as big of a problem.

Example codegen can be found here: https://goo.gl/3CSzbM

Note: This optimization is not safe with every pthread implementation.
Some implementations allocate on the first call to pthread_mutex_lock
and free the allocation in pthread_mutex_destroy.

Also, changing the triviality of the destructor is not an ABI break.
At least to the best of my knowledge :-)

llvm-svn: 365273

show more ...