[libc++] Replace uses of _VSTD:: by std:: (#74331)

As part of the upcoming clang-formatting of libc++, this patch performs
the long desired removal of the _VSTD macro.

See https://discourse.llvm

[libc++] Replace uses of _VSTD:: by std:: (#74331)

As part of the upcoming clang-formatting of libc++, this patch performs
the long desired removal of the _VSTD macro.

See https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
for the clang-format proposal.

show more ...

[libc++][NFC] Apply clang-format on large parts of the code base

This commit does a pass of clang-format over files in libc++ that
don't require major changes to conform to our style guide, or for
w

[libc++][NFC] Apply clang-format on large parts of the code base

This commit does a pass of clang-format over files in libc++ that
don't require major changes to conform to our style guide, or for
which we're not overly concerned about conflicting with in-flight
patches or hindering the git blame.

This roughly covers:
- benchmarks
- range algorithms
- concepts
- type traits

I did a manual verification of all the changes, and in particular I
applied clang-format on/off annotations in a few places where the
result was less readable after than before. This was not necessary
in a lot of places, however I did find that clang-format had pretty
bad taste when it comes to formatting concepts.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153140

show more ...

[libc++][NFC] Replace _LIBCPP_STD_VER > x with _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= x

This change is almost fully mechanical. The only interesting change is in `generate_feature_test_macro_components.py` to generate

[libc++][NFC] Replace _LIBCPP_STD_VER > x with _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= x

This change is almost fully mechanical. The only interesting change is in `generate_feature_test_macro_components.py` to generate `_LIBCPP_STD_VER >=` instead. To avoid churn in the git-blame this commit should be added to the `.git-blame-ignore-revs` once committed.

Reviewed By: ldionne, var-const, #libc

Spies: jloser, libcxx-commits, arichardson, arphaman, wenlei

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143962

show more ...

[libc++] Replace _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS with _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17. NFCI.

All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBC

[libc++] Replace _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS with _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17. NFCI.

All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528

show more ...

[libc++] Revert "Protect users from relying on detail headers" & related changes

This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e77 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit).

[libc++] Revert "Protect users from relying on detail headers" & related changes

This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e77 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683

show more ...

[libcxx][modules] protects users from relying on detail headers

libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that ou

[libcxx][modules] protects users from relying on detail headers

libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as <__ranges/access.h> instead of
<ranges>, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin to
rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124

show more ...

[libc++] Normalize all our '#pragma GCC system_header', and regression-test.

Now we'll notice if a header forgets to include this magic phrase.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D1188

[libc++] Normalize all our '#pragma GCC system_header', and regression-test.

Now we'll notice if a header forgets to include this magic phrase.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118800

show more ...

[libc++] [NFC] s/_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17 && !defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS)/!defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS)/

Per Discord discussion, we're normalizing on a simple `!defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS)

[libc++] [NFC] s/_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17 && !defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS)/!defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS)/

Per Discord discussion, we're normalizing on a simple `!defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS)`
so that we can do a big search-and-replace for `!defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS)`
back into `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17` when we're ready to abandon support for concept-syntax-less
compilers.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118748

show more ...

[libc++] Revert a use of `static_cast` for `_VSTD::forward`. NFCI.

As requested in D107584.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108743

[libc++][modularisation] Split up <concepts> into granular headers.

This is the complete split of <concepts>, with nothing left in the main header.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D

[libc++][modularisation] Split up <concepts> into granular headers.

This is the complete split of <concepts>, with nothing left in the main header.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107584

show more ...