History log of /llvm-project/flang/lib/Parser/expr-parsers.cpp (Results 1 – 12 of 12)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7
# a957cede 17-Dec-2024 Peter Klausler <pklausler@nvidia.com>

[flang] Handle substring in data statement constant (#120130)

The case of a constant substring wasn't handled in the parser for data
statement constants.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proje

[flang] Handle substring in data statement constant (#120130)

The case of a constant substring wasn't handled in the parser for data
statement constants.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/119005.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8
# 010c55bf 13-Jun-2024 Peter Klausler <35819229+klausler@users.noreply.github.com>

[flang] Improve error recovery in tricky situation (#95168)

When the very first statement of the executable part has syntax errors,
it's not at all obvious whether the error messages that are repor

[flang] Improve error recovery in tricky situation (#95168)

When the very first statement of the executable part has syntax errors,
it's not at all obvious whether the error messages that are reported to
the user should be those from its failure to be the last statement of
the specification part or its failure to be the first executable
statement when both failures are at the same character in the cooked
character stream. Fortran makes this problem more exciting by allowing
statement function definitions look a lot like several executable
statements.

The current error recovery scheme for declaration constructs depends on
a look-ahead test to see whether the failed construct is actually the
first executable statement. This works fine when the first executable
statement is not in error, but should also allow for some error cases
that begin with the tokens of an executable statement.

This can obviously still go wrong for declaration constructs that are
unparseable and also have ambiguity in their leading tokens with
executable statements, but that seems to be a less likely case.

Also improves error recovery for parenthesized items.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.7
# 68f4e46c 03-Jun-2024 Peter Klausler <35819229+klausler@users.noreply.github.com>

[flang] Adjust "doubled operator" expression extension (#93353)

Most Fortran compilers accept "doubled operators" as a language
extension. This is the use of a unary '+' or '-' operator that is not

[flang] Adjust "doubled operator" expression extension (#93353)

Most Fortran compilers accept "doubled operators" as a language
extension. This is the use of a unary '+' or '-' operator that is not
the first unparenthesized operator in an expression, as in 'x*-y'.

This compiler has implemented this extension, but in a way that's
different from other compilers' behavior. I interpreted the unary
'+'/'-' as a unary operator in the sense of C/C++, giving it a higher
priority than any binary (dyadic) operator.

All other compilers with this extension, however, give a unary '+'/'-' a
lower precedence than exponentiation ('**'), a binary operator that
C/C++ lacks. And this interpretation makes more sense for Fortran,
anyway, where the standard conforming '-x**y' must mean '-(x**y)'
already.

This patch makes 'x*-y**z' parse as 'x*-(y**z)', not 'x*(-y)**z)', and
adds a test to ensure that it does.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5
# 1c91d9bd 14-Nov-2023 Peter Klausler <35819229+klausler@users.noreply.github.com>

[flang] Ensure that portability warnings are conditional (#71857)

Before emitting a warning message, code should check that the usage in
question should be diagnosed by calling ShouldWarn(). A fair

[flang] Ensure that portability warnings are conditional (#71857)

Before emitting a warning message, code should check that the usage in
question should be diagnosed by calling ShouldWarn(). A fair number of
sites in the code do not, and can emit portability warnings
unconditionally, which can confuse a user that hasn't asked for them
(-pedantic) and isn't terribly concerned about portability *to* other
compilers.

Add calls to ShouldWarn() or IsEnabled() around messages that need them,
and add -pedantic to tests that now require it to test their portability
messages, and add more expected message lines to those tests when
-pedantic causes other diagnostics to fire.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3
# 619b5bfc 10-Oct-2022 Peter Klausler <pklausler@nvidia.com>

[flang] Improve error recovery for bad/missing construct END statements

When a multi-statement construct should end with a particular END statement
like "END SELECT", and that construct's END statem

[flang] Improve error recovery for bad/missing construct END statements

When a multi-statement construct should end with a particular END statement
like "END SELECT", and that construct's END statement is missing or
unrecognizable, the error recovery productions should not misinterpret
a program unit END statement that follows and consume it as a misspelled
construct END statement. Doing so leads to cascading errors or a failed parse.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136896

show more ...


Revision tags: working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init
# e03664d4 22-Jul-2022 Peter Klausler <pklausler@nvidia.com>

[flang] Fix parsing and semantics for array element substring%KIND/%LEN

A type-param-inquiry of %KIND or %LEN applies to a designator, and
so must also be allowed for a substring. F18 presently (mi

[flang] Fix parsing and semantics for array element substring%KIND/%LEN

A type-param-inquiry of %KIND or %LEN applies to a designator, and
so must also be allowed for a substring. F18 presently (mis)parses
instances of a type-param-inquiry as structure component references
and then fixes them in expression semantics when types are known and
we can distinguish them. But when the base of a type-param-inquiry is
a substring of an array element, as in "charArray(i)(j:k)%len",
parsing fails.

Adjust the grammar to parse these cases, and extend expression semantics
to process the new production.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130375

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1
# 2d8b6a47 14-Mar-2022 Peter Klausler <pklausler@nvidia.com>

[flang] Add explanatory messages to grammar for language extensions

Extend "extension<LanguageFeature>()" to incorporate an explanatory
message better than the current generic "nonstandard usage:".

[flang] Add explanatory messages to grammar for language extensions

Extend "extension<LanguageFeature>()" to incorporate an explanatory
message better than the current generic "nonstandard usage:".

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122035

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4
# 97ca41e1 22-Sep-2020 Michael Kruse <llvm-project@meinersbur.de>

[flang][msvc] Add explicit function template argument to applyLamda. NFC.

Like in D87961, msvc has difficulties deducing the template argument. The error message is:
```
expr-parsers.cpp(383): error

[flang][msvc] Add explicit function template argument to applyLamda. NFC.

Like in D87961, msvc has difficulties deducing the template argument. The error message is:
```
expr-parsers.cpp(383): error C2672: 'applyLambda': no matching overloaded function found
```
Explicitly pass the first template argument to help it.

This patch is part of the series to make flang compilable with MS Visual Studio <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2020-July/000448.html>.

Reviewed By: DavidTruby

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88001

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3
# 207d4499 22-Aug-2020 Michael Kruse <llvm-project@meinersbur.de>

[flang][msvc] Split class declaration and constexpr variable definition. NFC.

Msvc has trouble defining a struct/class and defining a constexpr symbol in the same declarator. It reports the followin

[flang][msvc] Split class declaration and constexpr variable definition. NFC.

Msvc has trouble defining a struct/class and defining a constexpr symbol in the same declarator. It reports the following error:
```
basic-parsers.h(809): error C2131: expression did not evaluate to a constant
basic-parsers.h(809): note: failure was caused by call of undefined function or one not declared 'constexpr'
basic-parsers.h(809): note: see usage of 'Fortran::parser::OkParser::OkParser'
```

Fix the msvc compilation by splitting the two definitions into two separate declarators.

This patch is part of the series to [[ http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2020-July/000448.html | make flang compilable with MS Visual Studio ]].

Reviewed By: DavidTruby, klausler

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85937

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1
# b98ad941 09-Apr-2020 David Truby <david.truby@arm.com>

[flang] Merge flang-compiler/f18

This is the initial merge of flang-compiler, which is done in this way
principally to preserve the history and git-blame, without generating a large
number of commit

[flang] Merge flang-compiler/f18

This is the initial merge of flang-compiler, which is done in this way
principally to preserve the history and git-blame, without generating a large
number of commits on the first-parent history of LLVM.

If you don't care about the flang history during a bisect remember that you can
supply paths to git-bisect, e.g. `git bisect start clang llvm`.

The history of f18 was rewritten to:

* Put the code under /flang/.
* Linearize the history.
* Rewrite commit messages so that issue and PR numbers point to the old repository.

Credit to Peter Waller for writing the flatten and merge script.

Updates: flang-compiler/f18#876 (submission into llvm-project)
Mailing-list: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-January/137989.html ([llvm-dev] Flang landing in the monorepo - next Monday!)
Mailing-list: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137661.html ([llvm-dev] Flang landing in the monorepo)

Co-authored-by: Peter Waller <peter.waller@arm.com>

show more ...


# 1f879005 29-Mar-2020 Tim Keith <tkeith@nvidia.com>

[flang] Reformat with latest clang-format and .clang-format

Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@9fe84f45d7fd685051004678d6b5775dcc4c6f8f
Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/1094


Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3
# 64ab3302 25-Feb-2020 CarolineConcatto <51754594+CarolineConcatto@users.noreply.github.com>

[flang] [LLVMify F18] Compiler module folders should have capitalised names (flang-compiler/f18#980)

This patch renames the modules in f18 to use a capital letter in the
module name

Signed-off-b

[flang] [LLVMify F18] Compiler module folders should have capitalised names (flang-compiler/f18#980)

This patch renames the modules in f18 to use a capital letter in the
module name

Signed-off-by: Caroline Concatto <caroline.concatto@arm.com>

Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@d2eb7a1c443d1539ef12b6f027074a0eb15b1ea0
Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/980

show more ...