History log of /llvm-project/clang/unittests/Driver/MultilibBuilderTest.cpp (Results 1 – 7 of 7)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4
# 26bf0b4a 02-Sep-2024 Simon Tatham <simon.tatham@arm.com>

[clang][Driver] Add a custom error option in multilib.yaml. (#105684)

Sometimes a collection of multilibs has a gap in it, where a set of
driver command-line options can't work with any of the avai

[clang][Driver] Add a custom error option in multilib.yaml. (#105684)

Sometimes a collection of multilibs has a gap in it, where a set of
driver command-line options can't work with any of the available
libraries.

For example, the Arm MVE extension requires special startup code (you
need to initialize FPSCR.LTPSIZE), and also benefits greatly from
-mfloat-abi=hard. So a multilib provider might build a library for
systems without MVE, and another for MVE with -mfloat-abi=hard,
anticipating that that's what most MVE users would want. But then if a
user compiles for MVE _without_ -mfloat-abi=hard, thhey can't use either
of those libraries – one has an ABI mismatch, and the other will fail to
set up LTPSIZE.

In that situation, it's useful to include a multilib.yaml entry for the
unworkable intermediate situation, and have it map to a fatal error
message rather than a set of actual libraries. Then the user gets a
build failure with a sensible explanation, instead of selecting an
unworkable library and silently generating bad output. The new
regression test demonstrates this case.

This patch introduces extra syntax into multilib.yaml, so that a record
in the `Variants` list can omit the `Dir` key, and in its place, provide
a `FatalError` key. Then, if that variant is selected, the error message
is emitted as a clang diagnostic, and multilib selection fails.

In order to emit the error message in `MultilibSet::select`, I had to
pass a `Driver &` to that function, which involved plumbing one through
to every call site, and in the unit tests, constructing one specially.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init
# f3dcc235 13-Dec-2023 Kazu Hirata <kazu@google.com>

[clang] Use StringRef::{starts,ends}_with (NFC) (#75149)

This patch replaces uses of StringRef::{starts,ends}with with
StringRef::{starts,ends}_with for consistency with
std::{string,string_view}:

[clang] Use StringRef::{starts,ends}_with (NFC) (#75149)

This patch replaces uses of StringRef::{starts,ends}with with
StringRef::{starts,ends}_with for consistency with
std::{string,string_view}::{starts,ends}_with in C++20.

I'm planning to deprecate and eventually remove
StringRef::{starts,ends}with.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2
# edc1130c 31-Jan-2023 Michael Platings <michael.platings@arm.com>

[Driver] Enable selecting multiple multilibs

This will enable layering multilibs on top of each other.
For example a multilib containing only a no-exceptions libc++ could be
layered on top of a mult

[Driver] Enable selecting multiple multilibs

This will enable layering multilibs on top of each other.
For example a multilib containing only a no-exceptions libc++ could be
layered on top of a multilib containing C libs. This avoids the need
to duplicate the C library for every libc++ variant.

This change doesn't expose the functionality externally, it only opens
the functionality up to be potentially used by ToolChain classes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143059

show more ...


# b4507dca 08-Jun-2023 Michael Platings <michael.platings@arm.com>

[NFC][Driver] Change MultilibBuilder flags argument order

Follow up to D151437

Reviewed By: phosek

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152353


# ce8fa36e 06-Jun-2023 Michael Platings <michael.platings@arm.com>

[NFC][Driver] Change Multilib flag representation

This new representation means that a valid command line option may
potentially be used directly as a multilib flag without any translation.

To indi

[NFC][Driver] Change Multilib flag representation

This new representation means that a valid command line option may
potentially be used directly as a multilib flag without any translation.

To indicate that a flag is required not to be present, its first
character is replaced with '!', which is intended for consistency with
the logical not operator in many programming languages.

Reviewed By: simon_tatham

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151438

show more ...


# 47b431d6 24-May-2023 Michael Platings <michael.platings@arm.com>

[NFC][Driver] Change MultilibBuilder interface

Decouple the interface of the MultilibBuilder flag method from how flags
are stored internally. Likewise change the addMultilibFlag function.

Currentl

[NFC][Driver] Change MultilibBuilder interface

Decouple the interface of the MultilibBuilder flag method from how flags
are stored internally. Likewise change the addMultilibFlag function.

Currently a multilib flag like "-fexceptions" means a multilib is
*incompatible* with the -fexceptions command line option, which is
counter-intuitive. This change is a step towards changing this scheme.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151437

show more ...


# 850dab0f 07-Feb-2023 Michael Platings <michael.platings@arm.com>

[NFC] Class for building MultilibSet

The functionality in MultilibSet for creating it is tied to its current
implementation. Putting that code in a separate class is an enabler for
changing the Mult

[NFC] Class for building MultilibSet

The functionality in MultilibSet for creating it is tied to its current
implementation. Putting that code in a separate class is an enabler for
changing the MultilibSet implementation.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142893

show more ...