|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0 |
|
| #
83ea47ac |
| 04-Sep-2022 |
Fangrui Song <i@maskray.me> |
[test] Make tests pass regardless of gnu++14/gnu++17 default
GCC from 11 onwards defaults to -std=gnu++17 for C++ source files. We want to do the same
(https://discourse.llvm.org/t/c-objc-switch-to-
[test] Make tests pass regardless of gnu++14/gnu++17 default
GCC from 11 onwards defaults to -std=gnu++17 for C++ source files. We want to do the same
(https://discourse.llvm.org/t/c-objc-switch-to-gnu-17-as-the-default-dialect/64360).
Split RUN lines, adjust `-verify`, or add `__cplusplus < 201703L` or `-Wno-dynamic-exception-spec`,
so that tests will pass regardless of gnu++14/gnu++17 default.
We have a desire to mark a test compatible with multiple language standards.
There are ongoing discussions how to add markers in the long term:
* https://discourse.llvm.org/t/iterating-lit-run-lines/62596
* https://discourse.llvm.org/t/lit-run-a-run-line-multiple-times-with-different-replacements/64932
As a workaround in the short term, add lit substitutions `%std_cxx98-`,
`%std_cxx11-14`, etc. They can be used for tests which work across multiple
language standards. If a range has `n` standards, run lit multiple times, with
`LIT_CLANG_STD_GROUP=0`, `LIT_CLANG_STD_GROUP=1`, etc to cover all `n` standards.
Reviewed By: #clang-language-wg, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131464
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
52e8f58d |
| 29-Dec-2021 |
Mariya Podchishchaeva <mariya.podchishchaeva@intel.com> |
[SYCL] Diagnose uses of zero length arrays
Adds diagnosing on attempt to use zero length arrays, pointers, refs, arrays
of them and structs/classes containing all of it.
In case a struct/class with
[SYCL] Diagnose uses of zero length arrays
Adds diagnosing on attempt to use zero length arrays, pointers, refs, arrays
of them and structs/classes containing all of it.
In case a struct/class with zero length array is used this emits a set
of notes pointing out how zero length array got into used struct, like
this:
```
struct ContainsArr {
int A[0]; // note: field of illegal type declared here
};
struct Wrapper {
ContainsArr F; // note: within field of type ContainsArr declared here
// ...
}
// Device code
Wrapper W;
W.use(); // error: zero-length arrays are not permitted
```
Total deep check of each used declaration may result in double
diagnosing at the same location.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114080
show more ...
|