History log of /llvm-project/clang/test/SemaOpenACC/compute-construct-clause-ast.cpp (Results 1 – 5 of 5)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7
# 2c2accbc 08-Jan-2025 erichkeane <ekeane@nvidia.com>

[OpenACC] Enable 'self' sema for 'update' construct

The 'self' clause is an unfortunately difficult one, as it has a
significantly different meaning between 'update' and the other
constructs. This

[OpenACC] Enable 'self' sema for 'update' construct

The 'self' clause is an unfortunately difficult one, as it has a
significantly different meaning between 'update' and the other
constructs. This patch introduces a way for the 'self' clause to work
as both. I considered making this two separate AST nodes (one for
'self' on 'update' and one for the others), however this makes the
automated macros/etc for supporting a clause break.

Instead, 'self' has the ability to act as either a condition or as a
var-list clause. As this is the only one of its kind, it is implemented
all within it. If in the future we have more that work like this, we
should consider rewriting a lot of the macros that we use to make
clauses work, and make them separate ast nodes.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7
# a15b685c 21-May-2024 Erich Keane <ekeane@nvidia.com>

[OpenACC] Implement 'reduction' sema for compute constructs (#92808)

'reduction' has a few restrictions over normal 'var-list' clauses:

1- On parallel, a num_gangs can only have 1 argument when c

[OpenACC] Implement 'reduction' sema for compute constructs (#92808)

'reduction' has a few restrictions over normal 'var-list' clauses:

1- On parallel, a num_gangs can only have 1 argument when combined with
reduction. These two aren't able to be combined on any other of the
compute constructs however.

2- The vars all must be 'numerical data types' types of some sort, or a
'composite of numerical data types'. A list of types is given in the
standard as a minimum, so we choose 'isScalar', which covers all of
these types and keeps types that are actually numeric. Other compilers
don't seem to implement the 'composite of numerical data types', though
we do.

3- Because of the above restrictions, member-of-composite is not
allowed, so any access via a memberexpr is disallowed. Array-element and
sub-arrays (aka array sections) are both permitted, so long as they meet
the requirements of #2.

This patch implements all of these for compute constructs.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4
# 61338782 16-Apr-2024 Erich Keane <ekeane@nvidia.com>

[OpenACC] Implement `self` clause for compute constructs (#88760)

`self` clauses on compute constructs take an optional condition
expression. We again limit the implementation to ONLY compute const

[OpenACC] Implement `self` clause for compute constructs (#88760)

`self` clauses on compute constructs take an optional condition
expression. We again limit the implementation to ONLY compute constructs
to ensure we get all the rules correct for others. However, this one
will be particularly complicated, as it takes a `var-list` for `update`,
so when we get to that construct/clause combination, we need to do that
as well.

This patch also furthers uses of the `OpenACCClauses.def` as it became
useful while implementing this (as well as some other minor refactors as
I went through).

Finally, `self` and `if` clauses have an interaction with each other, if
an `if` clause evaluates to `true`, the `self` clause has no effect.
While this is intended and can be used 'meaningfully', we are warning on
this with a very granular warning, so that this edge case will be
noticed by newer users, but can be disabled trivially.

show more ...


# daa88364 12-Apr-2024 Erich Keane <ekeane@nvidia.com>

[OpenACC] Implement 'if' clause for Compute Constructs (#88411)

Like with the 'default' clause, this is being applied to only Compute
Constructs for now. The 'if' clause takes a condition expressio

[OpenACC] Implement 'if' clause for Compute Constructs (#88411)

Like with the 'default' clause, this is being applied to only Compute
Constructs for now. The 'if' clause takes a condition expression which
is used as a runtime value.

This is not a particularly complex semantic implementation, as there
isn't much to this clause, other than its interactions with 'self',
which will be managed in the patch to implement that.

show more ...


# 0c7b92a4 10-Apr-2024 Erich Keane <ekeane@nvidia.com>

[OpenACC] Implement Default clause for Compute Constructs (#88135)

As a followup to my previous commits, this is an implementation of a
single clause, in this case the 'default' clause. This implem

[OpenACC] Implement Default clause for Compute Constructs (#88135)

As a followup to my previous commits, this is an implementation of a
single clause, in this case the 'default' clause. This implements all
semantic analysis for it on compute clauses, and continues to leave it
rejected for all others (some as 'doesnt appertain', others as 'not
implemented' as appropriate).

This also implements and tests the TreeTransform as requested in the
previous patch.

show more ...