|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
34b9b1ea |
| 09-Mar-2022 |
David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com> |
Disable -Wmissing-prototypes for internal linkage functions that aren't explicitly marked "static"
Some functions can end up non-externally visible despite not being
declared "static" or in an unnam
Disable -Wmissing-prototypes for internal linkage functions that aren't explicitly marked "static"
Some functions can end up non-externally visible despite not being
declared "static" or in an unnamed namespace in C++ - such as by having
parameters that are of non-external types.
Such functions aren't mistakenly intended to be defining some function
that needs a declaration. They could be maybe more legible (except for
the operator new example) with an explicit static, but that's a
stylistic thing outside what should be addressed by a warning.
This reapplies 275c56226d7fbd6a4d554807374f78d323aa0c1c - once we figure
out what to do about the change in behavior for -Wnon-c-typedef-for-linkage
(this reverts the revert commit 85ee1d3ca1d06b6bd3477515b8d0c72c8df7c069)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121328
show more ...
|
| #
85ee1d3c |
| 09-Mar-2022 |
David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com> |
Revert "Disable -Wmissing-prototypes for internal linkage functions that aren't explicitly marked "static""
Regresses:
typedef struct {
static void f() {
}
} a_t;
Causing this to error instead
Revert "Disable -Wmissing-prototypes for internal linkage functions that aren't explicitly marked "static""
Regresses:
typedef struct {
static void f() {
}
} a_t;
Causing this to error instead of warn, because the linkage is computed
earlier/too early perhaps. I'll send out a review to see if there's some
other path forward or if this is an acceptable regression, etc.
This reverts commit 275c56226d7fbd6a4d554807374f78d323aa0c1c.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init |
|
| #
275c5622 |
| 01-Feb-2022 |
David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com> |
Disable -Wmissing-prototypes for internal linkage functions that aren't explicitly marked "static"
Some functions can end up non-externally visible despite not being
declared "static" or in an unnam
Disable -Wmissing-prototypes for internal linkage functions that aren't explicitly marked "static"
Some functions can end up non-externally visible despite not being
declared "static" or in an unnamed namespace in C++ - such as by having
parameters that are of non-external types.
Such functions aren't mistakenly intended to be defining some function
that needs a declaration. They could be maybe more legible (except for
the `operator new` example) with an explicit static, but that's a
stylistic thing outside what should be addressed by a warning.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
e1e74f6c |
| 04-Jan-2022 |
David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com> |
-Wmissing-prototypes: Don't warn in named namespaces nested in anonymous namespaces
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3 |
|
| #
df195d8a |
| 18-Jun-2019 |
Aaron Puchert <aaron.puchert@sap.com> |
Suggestions to fix -Wmissing-{prototypes,variable-declarations}
Summary:
I've found that most often the proper way to fix this warning is to add
`static`, because if the code otherwise compiles and
Suggestions to fix -Wmissing-{prototypes,variable-declarations}
Summary:
I've found that most often the proper way to fix this warning is to add
`static`, because if the code otherwise compiles and links, the function
or variable is apparently not needed outside of the TU.
We can't provide a fix-it hint for variable declarations, because
multiple VarDecls can share the same type, and if we put static in front
of that, we affect all declared variables, some of which might have
previous declarations.
We also provide no fix-it hint for the rare case of an `extern` function
definition, because that would require removing `extern` and I have no
idea how to get the source location of the storage class specifier from
a FunctionDecl. I believe this information is only available earlier in
the AST construction from DeclSpec::getStorageClassSpecLoc(), but we
don't have that here.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59402
llvm-svn: 363749
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.0, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.1, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.0, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.1, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.0, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.9.1, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.9.0, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.8.1, llvmorg-3.8.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.8.0, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.7.1, llvmorg-3.7.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.7.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.7.0, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc4, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc3, studio-1.4, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.6.2, llvmorg-3.6.2-rc1, llvmorg-3.6.1, llvmorg-3.6.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.5.2, llvmorg-3.5.2-rc1 |
|
| #
8610cae9 |
| 12-Mar-2015 |
Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra@googlemail.com> |
Sema: Don't emit a missing prototype warning for deleted functions.
This is a bit more involved than I anticipated, so here's a breakdown
of the changes:
1. Call ActOnFinishFunctionBody _after_ we
Sema: Don't emit a missing prototype warning for deleted functions.
This is a bit more involved than I anticipated, so here's a breakdown
of the changes:
1. Call ActOnFinishFunctionBody _after_ we parsed =default and
=delete specifiers. Saying that we finished the body before parsing
=default is just wrong. Changing this allows us to use isDefaulted
and isDeleted on a decl in ActOnFinishFunctionBody.
2. Check for -Wmissing-prototypes after we parsed the function body.
3. Disable -Wmissing-prototypes when the Decl isDeleted.
llvm-svn: 232040
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.6.0, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc4, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.6.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.5.1, llvmorg-3.5.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.5.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.5.0, llvmorg-3.5.0-rc4, llvmorg-3.5.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.5.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.5.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.4.2, llvmorg-3.4.2-rc1, llvmorg-3.4.1, llvmorg-3.4.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.4.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.4.0, llvmorg-3.4.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.4.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.4.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.3.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.3.0, llvmorg-3.3.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.3.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.3.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.2.0, llvmorg-3.2.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.2.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.2.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.1.0, llvmorg-3.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.0.0, llvmorg-3.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-3.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-2.9.0, llvmorg-2.9.0-rc3, llvmorg-2.9.0-rc2 |
|
| #
30cd20a3 |
| 22-Mar-2011 |
John McCall <rjmccall@apple.com> |
Apply Jonathan Sauer's proposed solution to PR9519. Thanks!
llvm-svn: 128075
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-2.9.0-rc1, llvmorg-2.8.0, llvmorg-2.8.0-rc3, llvmorg-2.8.0-rc2, llvmorg-2.8.0-rc1, llvmorg-2.8.0-rc0, llvmorg-2.7.0 |
|
| #
8fbe78f6 |
| 15-Dec-2009 |
Daniel Dunbar <daniel@zuster.org> |
Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'.
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead o
Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'.
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
show more ...
|
| #
a038825b |
| 09-Dec-2009 |
Anders Carlsson <andersca@mac.com> |
Don't warn about function templates or function template specializations.
llvm-svn: 90943
|
| #
31c7e886 |
| 09-Dec-2009 |
Anders Carlsson <andersca@mac.com> |
Move the missing prototypes checking out into a new function. Don't warn about inline functions. Add a test.
llvm-svn: 90938
|