[Clang] disallow the use of asterisks preceding constructor and destructor names (#122621)

Fixes #121706

[clang]not lookup name containing a dependent type (#77587)

Fixes: #77583
bcd51aaaf8bde4b0ae7a4155d9ce3dec78fe2598 fixed part of template
instantiation dependent name issues but still missing some

[clang]not lookup name containing a dependent type (#77587)

Fixes: #77583
bcd51aaaf8bde4b0ae7a4155d9ce3dec78fe2598 fixed part of template
instantiation dependent name issues but still missing some cases This
patch want to enhance the dependent name check

show more ...

[clang] Use -std=c++23 instead of -std=c++2b

During the ISO C++ Committee meeting plenary session the C++23 Standard
has been voted as technical complete.

This updates the reference to c++2b to c++

[clang] Use -std=c++23 instead of -std=c++2b

During the ISO C++ Committee meeting plenary session the C++23 Standard
has been voted as technical complete.

This updates the reference to c++2b to c++23 and updates the __cplusplus
macro.

Drive-by fixes c++1z -> c++17 and c++2a -> c++20 when seen.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149553

show more ...

[clang] Add ElaboratedType sugaring for types on implicit special members

Extend the change from commit 15f3cd6bfc67 ([clang] Implement
ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare, 2021-10-11, D1

[clang] Add ElaboratedType sugaring for types on implicit special members

Extend the change from commit 15f3cd6bfc67 ([clang] Implement
ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare, 2021-10-11, D112374)
to cover types in the signatures of implicit copy-constructor,
copy-assignment, move-constructor, and move-assignment members in
C++ record types.

With this fix, diagnostic messages print types of special members
consistently whether they are explicitly or implicitly defined.

Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59557

Reviewed By: rsmith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141441

show more ...

Don't try to look up a name containing a dependent type.

Template instantiation can create names that are still dependent, such
as `operator T`. Don't assume that they can be looked up immediately,

Don't try to look up a name containing a dependent type.

Template instantiation can create names that are still dependent, such
as `operator T`. Don't assume that they can be looked up immediately,
and instead defer lookup for such names until we know what `T` is.

show more ...

[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare

Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which go

[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare

Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

---

Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:

1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
print types as written. There are customization options there, but
not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
the so called canonical types.
Example:
```
namespace foo {
struct A {};
A a;
};
```
If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
will make it print it accurately even when written without
qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.

2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
the name of the canonical type is the better choice.

3) This patch could expose a bug in how you get the source range of some
TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
dealing with will always include some source location.

4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
`dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.

5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.

Let me know if you need any help!

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374

show more ...

Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"

This reverts commit 7c51f02effdbd0d5e12bfd26f9c3b2ab5687c93f because it
stills breaks the LLDB tests. This was re-landed wi

Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"

This reverts commit 7c51f02effdbd0d5e12bfd26f9c3b2ab5687c93f because it
stills breaks the LLDB tests. This was re-landed without addressing the
issue or even agreement on how to address the issue. More details and
discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374.

show more ...

[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare

Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which go

[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare

Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

---

Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:

1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
print types as written. There are customization options there, but
not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
the so called canonical types.
Example:
```
namespace foo {
struct A {};
A a;
};
```
If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
will make it print it accurately even when written without
qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.

2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
the name of the canonical type is the better choice.

3) This patch could exposed a bug in how you get the source range of some
TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
dealing with will always include some source location.

4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
`dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.

5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.

Let me know if you need any help!

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374

show more ...

Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"

This reverts commit bdc6974f92304f4ed542241b9b89ba58ba6b20aa because it
breaks all the LLDB tests that import the std module

Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"

This reverts commit bdc6974f92304f4ed542241b9b89ba58ba6b20aa because it
breaks all the LLDB tests that import the std module.

import-std-module/array.TestArrayFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/deque-basic.TestDequeFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/deque-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentDequeFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/forward_list.TestForwardListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/forward_list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentForwardListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/list.TestListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/queue.TestQueueFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/stack.TestStackFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector.TestVectorFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector-bool.TestVectorBoolFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentVectorFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector-of-vectors.TestVectorOfVectorsFromStdModule.py

https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/45301/

show more ...

[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare

Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which go

[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare

Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374

show more ...

[clang] NFC: include non friendly types and missing sugar in test expectations

The dump of all diagnostics of all tests under `clang/test/{CXX,SemaCXX,SemaTemplate}` was analyzed , and all the cases

[clang] NFC: include non friendly types and missing sugar in test expectations

The dump of all diagnostics of all tests under `clang/test/{CXX,SemaCXX,SemaTemplate}` was analyzed , and all the cases where there were obviously bad canonical types being printed, like `type-parameter-*-*` and `<overloaded function type>` were identified. Also a small amount of cases of missing sugar were analyzed.

This patch then spells those explicitly in the test expectations, as preparatory work for future fixes for these problems.

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Reviewed By: rsmith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110210

show more ...

[clang] C++98 implicit moves are back with a vengeance

After taking C++98 implicit moves out in D104500,
we put it back in, but now in a new form which preserves
compatibility with pure C++98 progra

[clang] C++98 implicit moves are back with a vengeance

After taking C++98 implicit moves out in D104500,
we put it back in, but now in a new form which preserves
compatibility with pure C++98 programs, while at the same time
giving almost all the goodies from P1825.

* We use the exact same rules as C++20 with regards to which
id-expressions are move eligible. The previous
incarnation would only benefit from the proper subset which is
copy ellidable. This means we can implicit move, in addition:
* Parameters.
* RValue references.
* Exception variables.
* Variables with higher-than-natural required alignment.
* Objects with different type from the function return type.
* We preserve the two-overload resolution, with one small tweak to the
first one: If we either pick a (possibly converting) constructor which
does not take an rvalue reference, or a user conversion operator which
is not ref-qualified, we abort into the second overload resolution.

This gives C++98 almost all the implicit move patterns which we had created test
cases for, while at the same time preserving the meaning of these
three patterns, which are found in pure C++98 programs:
* Classes with both const and non-const copy constructors, but no move
constructors, continue to have their non-const copy constructor
selected.
* We continue to reject as ambiguous the following pattern:
```
struct A { A(B &); };
struct B { operator A(); };
A foo(B x) { return x; }
```
* We continue to pick the copy constructor in the following pattern:
```
class AutoPtrRef { };
struct AutoPtr {
AutoPtr(AutoPtr &);
AutoPtr();

AutoPtr(AutoPtrRef);
operator AutoPtrRef();
};
AutoPtr test_auto_ptr() {
AutoPtr p;
return p;
}
```

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Reviewed By: Quuxplusone

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105756

show more ...

[clang] Apply P1825 as Defect Report from C++11 up to C++20.

This extends the effects of [[ http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p1825r0.html | P1825 ]] to all C++ standards from

[clang] Apply P1825 as Defect Report from C++11 up to C++20.

This extends the effects of [[ http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p1825r0.html | P1825 ]] to all C++ standards from C++11 up to C++20.

According to Motion 23 from Cologne 2019, P1825R0 was accepted as a Defect Report, so we retroactively apply this all the way back to C++11.

Note that we also remove implicit moves from C++98 as an extension
altogether, since the expanded first overload resolution from P1825
can cause some meaning changes in C++98.
For example it can change which copy constructor is picked when both const
and non-const ones are available.

This also rips out warn_return_std_move since there are no cases where it would be worthwhile to suggest it.

This also fixes a bug with bailing into the second overload resolution
when encountering a non-rvref qualified conversion operator.
This was unnoticed until now, so two new test cases cover these.

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Reviewed By: rsmith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104500

show more ...

[clang] tests: cleanup, update and add some new ones

This reworks a small set of tests, as preparatory work for implementing
P2266.
* Run for more standard versions, including c++2b.
* Normalize fil

[clang] tests: cleanup, update and add some new ones

This reworks a small set of tests, as preparatory work for implementing
P2266.
* Run for more standard versions, including c++2b.
* Normalize file names and run commands.
* Adds some extra tests.

New Coroutine tests taken from Aaron Puchert's D68845.

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Reviewed By: thakis

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99225

show more ...

[clang] NFC: remove trailing white spaces from some tests

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99826

Remove redundant check for access in the conversion from the naming
class to the declaring class in a class member access.

This check does not appear to be backed by any rule in the standard (the
ru

Remove redundant check for access in the conversion from the naming
class to the declaring class in a class member access.

This check does not appear to be backed by any rule in the standard (the
rule in question was likely removed over the years), and only ever
produces duplicate diagnostics. (It's also not meaningful because there
isn't a unique declaring class after the resolution of core issue 39.)

show more ...

Perform ActOnConversionDeclarator after looking for any virtual functions it overrides

Summary: This allows for suppressing warnings about the conversion function never being called if it overrides

Perform ActOnConversionDeclarator after looking for any virtual functions it overrides

Summary: This allows for suppressing warnings about the conversion function never being called if it overrides a virtual function in a base class.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78444

show more ...

When diagnosing the lack of a viable conversion function, also list
explicit functions that are not candidates.

It's not always obvious that the reason a conversion was not possible is
because the f

When diagnosing the lack of a viable conversion function, also list
explicit functions that are not candidates.

It's not always obvious that the reason a conversion was not possible is
because the function you wanted to call is 'explicit', so explicitly say
if that's the case.

It would be nice to rank the explicit candidates higher in the
diagnostic if an implicit conversion sequence exists for their
arguments, but unfortunately we can't determine that without potentially
triggering non-immediate-context errors that we're not permitted to
produce.

show more ...

Correctly diagnose when a conversion function is declared with a type qualifier in the declaration specifiers rather than in the conversion type id. Fixes PR30595.

llvm-svn: 329924

Bail out if we try to build a DeclRefExpr naming an invalid declaration.

Most code paths would already bail out in this case, but certain paths,
particularly overload resolution and typo correction,

Bail out if we try to build a DeclRefExpr naming an invalid declaration.

Most code paths would already bail out in this case, but certain paths,
particularly overload resolution and typo correction, would not. Carrying on
with an invalid declaration could in some cases result in crashes due to
downstream code relying on declaration invariants that are not necessarily
met for invalid declarations, and in other cases just resulted in undesirable
follow-on diagnostics.

llvm-svn: 291030

show more ...

Mark invalid RecordDecls as completed.

Sema::ActOnTag creates TagDecls for records. However, if those record
declarations are invalid, and the parser is in C++ mode, it would
silently drop the TagDe

Mark invalid RecordDecls as completed.

Sema::ActOnTag creates TagDecls for records. However, if those record
declarations are invalid, and the parser is in C++ mode, it would
silently drop the TagDecl (and leave it as "beingDefined"). The problem
is that other code (e.g. the ASTWriter) will serialize all types, and
expects them to be complete. So, leaving them open would result in
failing asserts.

Fixes PR20320

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21176

llvm-svn: 285275

show more ...

Lit C++11 Compatibility Patch #8

24 tests have been updated for C++11 compatibility.

llvm-svn: 266387

Update a few more tests in response to the MS ABI enum semantics

Our self hosting buildbots found a few more tests which weren't updated
to reflect that the enum semantics are part of the Microsoft

Update a few more tests in response to the MS ABI enum semantics

Our self hosting buildbots found a few more tests which weren't updated
to reflect that the enum semantics are part of the Microsoft ABI.

llvm-svn: 249670

show more ...

PR21969: Improve diagnostics for a conversion function that has any pieces of a
declared return type (including a trailing-return-type in C++14).

llvm-svn: 224561

Change -Wbind-to-temporary-copy from an ExtWarn to an Extension.

The reasoning is that this construct is accepted by all compilers and valid in
C++11, so it doesn't seem like a useful warning to hav

Change -Wbind-to-temporary-copy from an ExtWarn to an Extension.

The reasoning is that this construct is accepted by all compilers and valid in
C++11, so it doesn't seem like a useful warning to have enabled by default.
Building with -pedantic, -Wbind-to-temporary-copy, or -Wc++98-compat still
shows the warning.

The motivation is that I built re2, and this was the only warning that was
emitted during the build. Both changing re2 to fix the warning and detecting
clang and suppressing the warning in re2's build seem inferior than just giving
the compiler a good default for this warning.

Also move the cxx98compat version of this warning to CXX98CompatPedantic, and
update tests accordingly.

llvm-svn: 218008

show more ...