Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4 |
|
#
56b63e08 |
| 26-Feb-2024 |
Timm Bäder <tbaeder@redhat.com> |
[clang][Interp] Get <=> value info from weak result
This is also what the current interpreter does and a couple of test cases expect that.
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1 |
|
#
8a4fcfc2 |
| 18-Nov-2021 |
Ilya Kuteev <ilyakuteev@yandex-team.ru> |
Remove non-affecting module maps from PCM files.
Problem: PCM file includes references to all module maps used in compilation which created PCM. This problem leads to PCM-rebuilds in distributed com
Remove non-affecting module maps from PCM files.
Problem: PCM file includes references to all module maps used in compilation which created PCM. This problem leads to PCM-rebuilds in distributed compilations as some module maps could be missing in isolated compilation. (For example in our distributed build system we create a temp folder for every compilation with only modules and headers that are needed for that particular command).
Solution: Add only affecting module map files to a PCM-file.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106876
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1 |
|
#
0a088ead |
| 29-Apr-2020 |
Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk> |
Improve diagnostics for missing import / #include of module.
Fix a few bugs where we would fail to properly determine header to module correspondence when determining whether to suggest a #include o
Improve diagnostics for missing import / #include of module.
Fix a few bugs where we would fail to properly determine header to module correspondence when determining whether to suggest a #include or import, and suggest a #include more often in language modes where there is no import syntax. Generally, if the target is in a header with include guards or #pragma once, we should suggest either #including or importing that header, and not importing a module that happens to textually include it.
In passing, improve the notes we attach to the corresponding diagnostics: calling an entity that we couldn't see "previous" is confusing.
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3 |
|
#
56bba012 |
| 09-Dec-2019 |
Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk> |
[c++20] Fix incorrect assumptions in checks for comparison category types.
In the presence of modules, we can have multiple lookup results for the same entity, and we need to re-check for completene
[c++20] Fix incorrect assumptions in checks for comparison category types.
In the presence of modules, we can have multiple lookup results for the same entity, and we need to re-check for completeness each time we consider a type.
show more ...
|