|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8 |
|
| #
66df6141 |
| 07-Jun-2024 |
Augusto Noronha <augusto2112@me.com> |
Fix #pragma (packed, n) not emitting the alignment in debug info (#94673)
Debug info generation won't emit the alignment of types that have a
standard alignment. It was not taking into account the
Fix #pragma (packed, n) not emitting the alignment in debug info (#94673)
Debug info generation won't emit the alignment of types that have a
standard alignment. It was not taking into account the that case.
rdar://127785973
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6 |
|
| #
c5de4dd1 |
| 05-May-2024 |
Fangrui Song <i@maskray.me> |
[test] %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm: remove redundant -S
And replace -emit-llvm -o - with -emit-llvm-only
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1 |
|
| #
b09ba426 |
| 06-Apr-2022 |
Ying Yi <maggieyi868@gmail.com> |
Bug 51277: [DWARF] DW_AT_alignment incorrect when
attribute((__aligned__)) is present but ignored`
In the original code, the 'getDeclAlignIfRequired' function is used.
The 'getDeclAlignIfRequired' f
Bug 51277: [DWARF] DW_AT_alignment incorrect when
attribute((__aligned__)) is present but ignored`
In the original code, the 'getDeclAlignIfRequired' function is used.
The 'getDeclAlignIfRequired' function will return the max alignment
of all aligned attributes if the type has aligned attributes. The
function doesn't consider the type at all.
The 'getTypeAlignIfRequired' function uses the type's alignment value,
which also used by the 'alignof' function. I think we should use the
function of 'getTypeAlignIfRequired'.
Reviewed By: dblaikie, jmorse, wolfgangp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124006
show more ...
|