History log of /llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGen/builtin-align-array.c (Results 1 – 17 of 17)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5
# 590884a8 04-Nov-2023 Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>

[Clang][CodeGen] Stoping emitting alignment assumes for `align_{up,down}`

Now that `align_{up,down}` use `llvm.ptrmask` (as of #71238), the
assume doesn't preserve any information that is not still

[Clang][CodeGen] Stoping emitting alignment assumes for `align_{up,down}`

Now that `align_{up,down}` use `llvm.ptrmask` (as of #71238), the
assume doesn't preserve any information that is not still easily
re-computable.

Closes #71295

show more ...


# 71be514f 03-Nov-2023 Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>

[Clang][CodeGen] Emit `llvm.ptrmask` for `align_up` and `align_down`

Since PR's #69343 and #67166 we probably have enough support for
`llvm.ptrmask` to make it preferable to the GEP stategy.

Closes

[Clang][CodeGen] Emit `llvm.ptrmask` for `align_up` and `align_down`

Since PR's #69343 and #67166 we probably have enough support for
`llvm.ptrmask` to make it preferable to the GEP stategy.

Closes #71238

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3
# 39db5e1e 07-Oct-2022 Nikita Popov <npopov@redhat.com>

[CodeGen] Convert tests to opaque pointers (NFC)

Conversion performed using the script at:
https://gist.github.com/nikic/98357b71fd67756b0f064c9517b62a34

These are only tests where no manual fixup

[CodeGen] Convert tests to opaque pointers (NFC)

Conversion performed using the script at:
https://gist.github.com/nikic/98357b71fd67756b0f064c9517b62a34

These are only tests where no manual fixup was required.

show more ...


Revision tags: working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1
# 532dc62b 07-Apr-2022 Nikita Popov <npopov@redhat.com>

[OpaquePtrs][Clang] Add -no-opaque-pointers to tests (NFC)

This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be p

[OpaquePtrs][Clang] Add -no-opaque-pointers to tests (NFC)

This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be part of the migration approach described in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/enabling-opaque-pointers-by-default/61322/9.

The patch has been produced by replacing %clang_cc1 with
%clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers for tests that fail with opaque
pointers enabled. Worth noting that this doesn't cover all tests,
there's a remaining ~40 tests not using %clang_cc1 that will need
a followup change.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123115

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3
# 1b1c8d83 16-Jan-2022 hyeongyu kim <gusrb406@snu.ac.kr>

[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default

Turning on `enable_noundef_analysis` flag allows better codegen by removing freeze instructions.
I

[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default

Turning on `enable_noundef_analysis` flag allows better codegen by removing freeze instructions.
I modified clang by renaming `enable_noundef_analysis` flag to `disable-noundef-analysis` and turning it off by default.

Test updates are made as a separate patch: D108453

Reviewed By: eugenis

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105169

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1
# fd9b0999 08-Nov-2021 hyeongyu kim <gusrb406@snu.ac.kr>

Revert "[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default"

This reverts commit aacfbb953eb705af2ecfeb95a6262818fa85dd92.

Revert "Fix lit test failu

Revert "[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default"

This reverts commit aacfbb953eb705af2ecfeb95a6262818fa85dd92.

Revert "Fix lit test failures in CodeGenCoroutines"

This reverts commit 63fff0f5bffe20fa2c84a45a41161afa0043cb34.

show more ...


# aacfbb95 15-Oct-2021 hyeongyukim <gusrb406@snu.ac.kr>

[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default

Turning on `enable_noundef_analysis` flag allows better codegen by removing freeze instructions.
I

[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default

Turning on `enable_noundef_analysis` flag allows better codegen by removing freeze instructions.
I modified clang by renaming `enable_noundef_analysis` flag to `disable-noundef-analysis` and turning it off by default.

Test updates are made as a separate patch: D108453

Reviewed By: eugenis

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105169

[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default (2)

This patch updates test files after D105169.
Autogenerated test codes are changed by `utils/update_cc_test_checks.py,` and non-autogenerated test codes are changed as follows:

(1) I wrote a python script that (partially) updates the tests using regex: {F18594904} The script is not perfect, but I believe it gives hints about which patterns are updated to have `noundef` attached.

(2) The remaining tests are updated manually.

Reviewed By: eugenis

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108453

Resolve lit failures in clang after 8ca4b3e's land

Fix lit test failures in clang-ppc* and clang-x64-windows-msvc

Fix missing failures in clang-ppc64be* and retry fixing clang-x64-windows-msvc

Fix internal_clone(aarch64) inline assembly

show more ...


# 89ad2822 06-Nov-2021 Juneyoung Lee <aqjune@gmail.com>

Revert "[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default"

This reverts commit 7584ef766a7219b6ee5a400637206d26e0fa98ac.


# 7584ef76 06-Nov-2021 Juneyoung Lee <aqjune@gmail.com>

[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default

Turning on `enable_noundef_analysis` flag allows better codegen by removing freeze instructions.
I

[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default

Turning on `enable_noundef_analysis` flag allows better codegen by removing freeze instructions.
I modified clang by renaming `enable_noundef_analysis` flag to `disable-noundef-analysis` and turning it off by default.

Test updates are made as a separate patch: D108453

Reviewed By: eugenis

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105169

show more ...


# f193bcc7 18-Oct-2021 Juneyoung Lee <aqjune@gmail.com>

Revert D105169 due to the two-stage failure in ASAN

This reverts the following commits:
37ca7a795b277c20c02a218bf44052278c03344b
9aa6c72b92b6c89cc6d23b693257df9af7de2d15
705387c5074bcca36d626882462e

Revert D105169 due to the two-stage failure in ASAN

This reverts the following commits:
37ca7a795b277c20c02a218bf44052278c03344b
9aa6c72b92b6c89cc6d23b693257df9af7de2d15
705387c5074bcca36d626882462ebbc2bcc3bed4
8ca4b3ef19fe82d7ad6a6e1515317dcc01b41515
80dba72a669b5416e97a42fd2c2a7bc5a6d3f44a

show more ...


# 8ca4b3ef 15-Oct-2021 Juneyoung Lee <aqjune@gmail.com>

[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default (2)

This patch updates test files after D105169.
Autogenerated test codes are changed by `utils/up

[Clang/Test]: Rename enable_noundef_analysis to disable-noundef-analysis and turn it off by default (2)

This patch updates test files after D105169.
Autogenerated test codes are changed by `utils/update_cc_test_checks.py,` and non-autogenerated test codes are changed as follows:

(1) I wrote a python script that (partially) updates the tests using regex: {F18594904} The script is not perfect, but I believe it gives hints about which patterns are updated to have `noundef` attached.

(2) The remaining tests are updated manually.

Reviewed By: eugenis

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108453

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3
# 78de7297 12-Sep-2020 Tyker <tyker1@outlook.com>

Reland [AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions

NOTE: There is a mailing list discussion on this: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html

Compl

Reland [AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions

NOTE: There is a mailing list discussion on this: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html

Complemantary to the assumption outliner prototype in D71692, this patch
shows how we could simplify the code emitted for an alignemnt
assumption. The generated code is smaller, less fragile, and it makes it
easier to recognize the additional use as a "assumption use".

As mentioned in D71692 and on the mailing list, we could adopt this
scheme, and similar schemes for other patterns, without adopting the
assumption outlining.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1
# 7bfaa400 16-Jul-2020 Eric Christopher <echristo@gmail.com>

Temporarily Revert "[AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions"
due to the performance bugs filed in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46753.

An SROA change soon may obv

Temporarily Revert "[AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions"
due to the performance bugs filed in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46753.

An SROA change soon may obviate some of these problems.

This reverts commit 8d09f20798ac180b1749276bff364682ce0196ab.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-12-init
# 8d09f207 13-Jul-2020 Tyker <tyker1@outlook.com>

[AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions

Summary:
NOTE: There is a mailing list discussion on this: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html

Com

[AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions

Summary:
NOTE: There is a mailing list discussion on this: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html

Complemantary to the assumption outliner prototype in D71692, this patch
shows how we could simplify the code emitted for an alignemnt
assumption. The generated code is smaller, less fragile, and it makes it
easier to recognize the additional use as a "assumption use".

As mentioned in D71692 and on the mailing list, we could adopt this
scheme, and similar schemes for other patterns, without adopting the
assumption outlining.

Reviewers: hfinkel, xbolva00, lebedev.ri, nikic, rjmccall, spatel, jdoerfert, sstefan1

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Subscribers: thopre, yamauchi, kuter, fhahn, merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, bollu, rkruppe, cfe-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #clang, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71739

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3
# 7ea46aee 04-Jul-2020 Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri@gmail.com>

Revert "[AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions"

Assume bundle can have more than one entry with the same name,
but at least AlignmentFromAssumptionsPass::extractAlignmen

Revert "[AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions"

Assume bundle can have more than one entry with the same name,
but at least AlignmentFromAssumptionsPass::extractAlignmentInfo() uses
getOperandBundle("align"), which internally assumes that it isn't the
case, and happily crashes otherwise.

Minimal reduced reproducer: run `opt -alignment-from-assumptions` on

target datalayout = "e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"

%0 = type { i64, %1*, i8*, i64, %2, i32, %3*, i8* }
%1 = type opaque
%2 = type { i8, i8, i16 }
%3 = type { i32, i32, i32, i32 }

; Function Attrs: nounwind
define i32 @f(%0* noalias nocapture readonly %arg, %0* noalias %arg1) local_unnamed_addr #0 {
bb:
call void @llvm.assume(i1 true) [ "align"(%0* %arg, i64 8), "align"(%0* %arg1, i64 8) ]
ret i32 0
}

; Function Attrs: nounwind willreturn
declare void @llvm.assume(i1) #1

attributes #0 = { nounwind "reciprocal-estimates"="none" }
attributes #1 = { nounwind willreturn }


This is what we'd have with -mllvm -enable-knowledge-retention

This reverts commit c95ffadb2474a4d8c4f598d94d35a9f31d9606cb.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2
# c95ffadb 24-Jun-2020 Tyker <tyker1@outlook.com>

[AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions

Summary:
NOTE: There is a mailing list discussion on this: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html

Com

[AssumeBundles] Use operand bundles to encode alignment assumptions

Summary:
NOTE: There is a mailing list discussion on this: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html

Complemantary to the assumption outliner prototype in D71692, this patch
shows how we could simplify the code emitted for an alignemnt
assumption. The generated code is smaller, less fragile, and it makes it
easier to recognize the additional use as a "assumption use".

As mentioned in D71692 and on the mailing list, we could adopt this
scheme, and similar schemes for other patterns, without adopting the
assumption outlining.

Reviewers: hfinkel, xbolva00, lebedev.ri, nikic, rjmccall, spatel, jdoerfert, sstefan1

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Subscribers: yamauchi, kuter, fhahn, merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, bollu, rkruppe, cfe-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #clang, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71739

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init
# 8c387cbe 09-Jan-2020 Alex Richardson <Alexander.Richardson@cl.cam.ac.uk>

Add builtins for aligning and checking alignment of pointers and integers

This change introduces three new builtins (which work on both pointers
and integers) that can be used instead of common bitw

Add builtins for aligning and checking alignment of pointers and integers

This change introduces three new builtins (which work on both pointers
and integers) that can be used instead of common bitwise arithmetic:
__builtin_align_up(x, alignment), __builtin_align_down(x, alignment) and
__builtin_is_aligned(x, alignment).

I originally added these builtins to the CHERI fork of LLVM a few years ago
to handle the slightly different C semantics that we use for CHERI [1].
Until recently these builtins (or sequences of other builtins) were
required to generate correct code. I have since made changes to the default
C semantics so that they are no longer strictly necessary (but using them
does generate slightly more efficient code). However, based on our experience
using them in various projects over the past few years, I believe that adding
these builtins to clang would be useful.

These builtins have the following benefit over bit-manipulation and casts
via uintptr_t:

- The named builtins clearly convey the semantics of the operation. While
checking alignment using __builtin_is_aligned(x, 16) versus
((x & 15) == 0) is probably not a huge win in readably, I personally find
__builtin_align_up(x, N) a lot easier to read than (x+(N-1))&~(N-1).
- They preserve the type of the argument (including const qualifiers). When
using casts via uintptr_t, it is easy to cast to the wrong type or strip
qualifiers such as const.
- If the alignment argument is a constant value, clang can check that it is
a power-of-two and within the range of the type. Since the semantics of
these builtins is well defined compared to arbitrary bit-manipulation,
it is possible to add a UBSAN checker that the run-time value is a valid
power-of-two. I intend to add this as a follow-up to this change.
- The builtins avoids int-to-pointer casts both in C and LLVM IR.
In the future (i.e. once most optimizations handle it), we could use the new
llvm.ptrmask intrinsic to avoid the ptrtoint instruction that would normally
be generated.
- They can be used to round up/down to the next aligned value for both
integers and pointers without requiring two separate macros.
- In many projects the alignment operations are already wrapped in macros (e.g.
roundup2 and rounddown2 in FreeBSD), so by replacing the macro implementation
with a builtin call, we get improved diagnostics for many call-sites while
only having to change a few lines.
- Finally, the builtins also emit assume_aligned metadata when used on pointers.
This can improve code generation compared to the uintptr_t casts.

[1] In our CHERI compiler we have compilation mode where all pointers are
implemented as capabilities (essentially unforgeable 128-bit fat pointers).
In our original model, casts from uintptr_t (which is a 128-bit capability)
to an integer value returned the "offset" of the capability (i.e. the
difference between the virtual address and the base of the allocation).
This causes problems for cases such as checking the alignment: for example, the
expression `if ((uintptr_t)ptr & 63) == 0` is generally used to check if the
pointer is aligned to a multiple of 64 bytes. The problem with offsets is that
any pointer to the beginning of an allocation will have an offset of zero, so
this check always succeeds in that case (even if the address is not correctly
aligned). The same issues also exist when aligning up or down. Using the
alignment builtins ensures that the address is used instead of the offset. While
I have since changed the default C semantics to return the address instead of
the offset when casting, this offset compilation mode can still be used by
passing a command-line flag.

Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, theraven, fhahn, lebedev.ri, nlopes, aqjune
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71499

show more ...