Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3 |
|
#
c202a17d |
| 16-Oct-2023 |
Balázs Kéri <balazs.keri@ericsson.com> |
[clang][analyzer] Move checker alpha.unix.StdCLibraryFunctions out of alpha. (#66207)
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5 |
|
#
4f0436dd |
| 01-Jun-2023 |
Balázs Kéri <balazs.keri@ericsson.com> |
[clang][analyzer] Merge apiModeling.StdCLibraryFunctions and StdCLibraryFunctionArgs checkers into one.
Main reason for this change is that these checkers were implemented in the same class but had
[clang][analyzer] Merge apiModeling.StdCLibraryFunctions and StdCLibraryFunctionArgs checkers into one.
Main reason for this change is that these checkers were implemented in the same class but had different dependency ordering. (NonNullParamChecker should run before StdCLibraryFunctionArgs to get more special warning about null arguments, but the apiModeling.StdCLibraryFunctions was a modeling checker that should run before other non-modeling checkers. The modeling checker changes state in a way that makes it impossible to detect a null argument by NonNullParamChecker.) To make it more simple, the modeling part is removed as separate checker and can be only used if checker StdCLibraryFunctions is turned on, that produces the warnings too. Modeling the functions without bug detection (for invalid argument) is not possible. The modeling of standard functions does not happen by default from this change on.
Reviewed By: Szelethus
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151225
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1 |
|
#
634258b8 |
| 15-May-2020 |
Gabor Marton <gabor.marton@ericsson.com> |
[analyzer] StdLibraryFunctionsChecker: Add support to lookup types
Summary: In this patch I am trying to get rid of the `Irrelevant` types from the signatures of the functions from the standard C li
[analyzer] StdLibraryFunctionsChecker: Add support to lookup types
Summary: In this patch I am trying to get rid of the `Irrelevant` types from the signatures of the functions from the standard C library. For that I've introduced `lookupType()` to be able to lookup arbitrary types in the global scope. This makes it possible to define the signatures precisely.
Note 1) `fread`'s signature is now fixed to have the proper `FILE *restrict` type when C99 is the language. Note 2) There are still existing `Irrelevant` types, but they are all from POSIX. I am planning to address those together with the missing POSIX functions (in D79433).
Reviewers: xazax.hun, NoQ, Szelethus, balazske
Subscribers: whisperity, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, rnkovacs, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, donat.nagy, dkrupp, gamesh411, Charusso, steakhal, ASDenysPetrov, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80016
show more ...
|