Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3 |
|
#
37785fed |
| 25-Mar-2024 |
Discookie <viktor.cseh@ericsson.com> |
[clang][analyzer] Bring cplusplus.ArrayDelete out of alpha (#83985)
The checker finds a type of undefined behavior, where if the type of a
pointer to an object-array is different from the objects'
[clang][analyzer] Bring cplusplus.ArrayDelete out of alpha (#83985)
The checker finds a type of undefined behavior, where if the type of a
pointer to an object-array is different from the objects' underlying
type, calling `delete[]` is undefined, as the size of the two objects
might be different.
The checker has been in alpha for a while now, it is a simple checker
that causes no crashes, and considering the severity of the issue, it
has a low result-count on open-source projects (in my last test-run on
my usual projects, it had 0 results).
This commit cleans up the documentation and adds docs for the limitation
related to tracking through references, in addition to moving it to
`cplusplus`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Balazs Benics <benicsbalazs@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: whisperity <whisperity@gmail.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init |
|
#
18f219c5 |
| 01-Jan-2024 |
Balazs Benics <benicsbalazs@gmail.com> |
[analyzer][NFC] Cleanup BugType lazy-init patterns (#76655)
Cleanup most of the lazy-init `BugType` legacy.
Some will be preserved, as those are slightly more complicated to
refactor.
Notice, t
[analyzer][NFC] Cleanup BugType lazy-init patterns (#76655)
Cleanup most of the lazy-init `BugType` legacy.
Some will be preserved, as those are slightly more complicated to
refactor.
Notice, that the default category for `BugType` is `LogicError`. I
omitted setting this explicitly where I could.
Please, actually have a look at the diff. I did this manually, and we
rarely check the bug type descriptions and stuff in tests, so the
testing might be shallow on this one.
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4 |
|
#
564e0165 |
| 30-Oct-2023 |
Discookie <viktor.cseh@ericsson.com> |
[clang][analyzer] Do not analyze opaque types in CXXDeleteChecker (#70638)
While inheritance can only be expressed if the class has a definition,
in this case one of the types might be opaque to th
[clang][analyzer] Do not analyze opaque types in CXXDeleteChecker (#70638)
While inheritance can only be expressed if the class has a definition,
in this case one of the types might be opaque to the analyzer.
Fixes a crash encountered while analyzing LLVM.
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.3 |
|
#
0e246bb6 |
| 09-Oct-2023 |
Viktor Cseh <viktor.cseh@ericsson.com> |
[clang][analyzer] Add C++ array delete checker
This checker reports cases where an array of polymorphic objects are deleted as their base class. Deleting an array where the array's static type is di
[clang][analyzer] Add C++ array delete checker
This checker reports cases where an array of polymorphic objects are deleted as their base class. Deleting an array where the array's static type is different from its dynamic type is undefined.
Since the checker is similar to DeleteWithNonVirtualDtorChecker, I refactored that checker to support more detection types.
This checker corresponds to the SEI Cert rule EXP51-CPP: Do not delete an array through a pointer of the incorrect type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158156
show more ...
|
#
71ae858c |
| 06-Oct-2023 |
Viktor Cseh <viktor.cseh@ericsson.com> |
[clang][analyzer] Rename DeleteWithNonVirtualDtorChecker to CXXDeleteChecker
This rename is done in a separate commit to preserve `git blame`, before implementing CXXArrayDeleteChecker and refactori
[clang][analyzer] Rename DeleteWithNonVirtualDtorChecker to CXXDeleteChecker
This rename is done in a separate commit to preserve `git blame`, before implementing CXXArrayDeleteChecker and refactoring the file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158156
show more ...
|