|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5 |
|
| #
f40f4fce |
| 17-Apr-2024 |
Congcong Cai <congcongcai0907@163.com> |
[clang analysis] ExprMutationAnalyzer support recursive forwarding reference (#88843)
Reapply for #88765.
Partially fixes: #60895.
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.4 |
|
| #
b2f07a91 |
| 15-Apr-2024 |
Florian Mayer <fmayer@google.com> |
Revert "[clang analysis] ExprMutationAnalyzer avoid infinite recursion for recursive forwarding reference" (#88765)
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#87954
Broke sanitizer bots, e.g.
https://lab.llvm.or
Revert "[clang analysis] ExprMutationAnalyzer avoid infinite recursion for recursive forwarding reference" (#88765)
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#87954
Broke sanitizer bots, e.g.
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/239/builds/6587/steps/10/logs/stdio
show more ...
|
| #
8095b9ce |
| 15-Apr-2024 |
Congcong Cai <congcongcai0907@163.com> |
[clang analysis] ExprMutationAnalyzer avoid infinite recursion for recursive forwarding reference (#87954)
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init |
|
| #
9f8ccf50 |
| 22-Jan-2024 |
Julian Schmidt <44101708+5chmidti@users.noreply.github.com> |
[clang-tidy] fix misc-const-correctnes false-positive for fold expressions (#78320)
The check no longer emits a diagnostic for non-parameter-pack
variables in C++17 fold expressions.
The operator
[clang-tidy] fix misc-const-correctnes false-positive for fold expressions (#78320)
The check no longer emits a diagnostic for non-parameter-pack
variables in C++17 fold expressions.
The operator used is type-dependent because of the parameter pack
and can therefore not be guaranteed to not mutate the variable.
Fixes: #70323
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.6 |
|
| #
a3d76b3f |
| 14-Nov-2023 |
Julian Schmidt <44101708+5chmidti@users.noreply.github.com> |
[clang-tidy] fix match for binaryOperator in ExprMutationAnalyzer for misc-const-correctness (#70559)
The `ExprMutationAnalyzer`s matcher of `binaryOperator`s
that contained the variable expr, were
[clang-tidy] fix match for binaryOperator in ExprMutationAnalyzer for misc-const-correctness (#70559)
The `ExprMutationAnalyzer`s matcher of `binaryOperator`s
that contained the variable expr, were previously narrowing the
variable to be type dependent, when the `binaryOperator` should
have been narrowed as dependent.
The variable we are trying to find mutations for does
not need to be the dependent type, the other operand of
the `binaryOperator` could be dependent.
Fixes #57297
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
1af159e9 |
| 07-Aug-2023 |
Piotr Zegar <me@piotrzegar.pl> |
[clang-tidy][NFC] Update tests to CheckOptions using new syntax
This patch is just updating all test files to use the new syntax.
Fix for changes introduced after D130209 were created.
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init |
|
| #
46ae26e7 |
| 24-Jul-2022 |
Jonas Toth <development@jonas-toth.eu> |
[clang-tidy] implement new check 'misc-const-correctness' to add 'const' to unmodified variables
This patch connects the check for const-correctness with the new general
utility to add `const` to va
[clang-tidy] implement new check 'misc-const-correctness' to add 'const' to unmodified variables
This patch connects the check for const-correctness with the new general
utility to add `const` to variables.
The code-transformation is only done, if the detected variable for const-ness
is not part of a group-declaration.
The check allows to control multiple facets of adding `const`, e.g. if pointers themself should be
marked as `const` if they are not changed.
Reviewed By: njames93
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54943
show more ...
|