|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3 |
|
| #
75adb122 |
| 17-Feb-2024 |
Piotr Zegar <piotr.zegar@nokia.com> |
[clang-tidy] Fix handling of parentheses in bugprone-non-zero-enum-to-bool-conversion (#81890)
Properly ignore parentheses in bitwise operators.
Closes #81515
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0 |
|
| #
503e3152 |
| 10-Sep-2023 |
Piotr Zegar <me@piotrzegar.pl> |
[clang-tidy] Exclude bitwise operators in bugprone-non-zero-enum-to-bool-conversion (#65498)
Improved bugprone-non-zero-enum-to-bool-conversion check by eliminating
false positives resulting from d
[clang-tidy] Exclude bitwise operators in bugprone-non-zero-enum-to-bool-conversion (#65498)
Improved bugprone-non-zero-enum-to-bool-conversion check by eliminating
false positives resulting from direct usage of bitwise operators.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
1af159e9 |
| 07-Aug-2023 |
Piotr Zegar <me@piotrzegar.pl> |
[clang-tidy][NFC] Update tests to CheckOptions using new syntax
This patch is just updating all test files to use the new syntax.
Fix for changes introduced after D130209 were created.
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2 |
|
| #
3bf322e6 |
| 16-Apr-2023 |
Piotr Zegar <piotr.zegar@nokia.com> |
[clang-tidy] Add bugprone-non-zero-enum-to-bool-conversion check
Detect implicit and explicit conversions of enum to bool,
when enum doesn't have a enumerator with value equal to 0.
In theory such c
[clang-tidy] Add bugprone-non-zero-enum-to-bool-conversion check
Detect implicit and explicit conversions of enum to bool,
when enum doesn't have a enumerator with value equal to 0.
In theory such conversion should always return TRUE.
Reviewed By: carlosgalvezp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144036
show more ...
|