[clang-tidy][NFC] Fix clang-analyzer-optin.cplusplus.UninitializedObject findings

Fix issues found by clang-tidy in clang-tidy source directory.

[clang-tidy][NFC] Fix modernize-use-auto findings

Fix issues found by clang-tidy in clang-tidy source directory.

[clang-tidy][NFC] Use C++17 nested namespaces in the clang-tidy folder

Fix applied by running:

run-clang-tidy.py -checks=-*,modernize-concat-nested-namespaces

Differential Revision: https://review

[clang-tidy][NFC] Use C++17 nested namespaces in the clang-tidy folder

Fix applied by running:

run-clang-tidy.py -checks=-*,modernize-concat-nested-namespaces

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141770

show more ...

[clang-tools-extra] Fixed a number of typos

I went over the output of the following mess of a command:

`(ulimit -m 2000000; ulimit -v 2000000; git ls-files -z | parallel --xargs -0 cat | aspell lis

[clang-tools-extra] Fixed a number of typos

I went over the output of the following mess of a command:

`(ulimit -m 2000000; ulimit -v 2000000; git ls-files -z | parallel --xargs -0 cat | aspell list --mode=none --ignore-case | grep -E '^[A-Za-z][a-z]*$' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n | grep -vE '.{25}' | aspell pipe -W3 | grep : | cut -d' ' -f2 | less)`

and proceeded to spend a few days looking at it to find probable typos
and fixed a few hundred of them in all of the llvm project (note, the
ones I found are not anywhere near all of them, but it seems like a
good start).

Reviewed By: kadircet

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130826

show more ...

[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare

Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which go

[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare

Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

---

Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:

1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
print types as written. There are customization options there, but
not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
the so called canonical types.
Example:
```
namespace foo {
struct A {};
A a;
};
```
If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
will make it print it accurately even when written without
qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.

2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
the name of the canonical type is the better choice.

3) This patch could expose a bug in how you get the source range of some
TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
dealing with will always include some source location.

4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
`dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.

5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.

Let me know if you need any help!

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374

show more ...

Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"

This reverts commit 7c51f02effdbd0d5e12bfd26f9c3b2ab5687c93f because it
stills breaks the LLDB tests. This was re-landed wi

Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"

This reverts commit 7c51f02effdbd0d5e12bfd26f9c3b2ab5687c93f because it
stills breaks the LLDB tests. This was re-landed without addressing the
issue or even agreement on how to address the issue. More details and
discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374.

show more ...

[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare

Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which go

[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare

Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

---

Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:

1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
print types as written. There are customization options there, but
not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
the so called canonical types.
Example:
```
namespace foo {
struct A {};
A a;
};
```
If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
will make it print it accurately even when written without
qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.

2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
the name of the canonical type is the better choice.

3) This patch could exposed a bug in how you get the source range of some
TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
dealing with will always include some source location.

4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
`dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.

5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.

Let me know if you need any help!

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374

show more ...

Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"

This reverts commit bdc6974f92304f4ed542241b9b89ba58ba6b20aa because it
breaks all the LLDB tests that import the std module

Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"

This reverts commit bdc6974f92304f4ed542241b9b89ba58ba6b20aa because it
breaks all the LLDB tests that import the std module.

import-std-module/array.TestArrayFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/deque-basic.TestDequeFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/deque-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentDequeFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/forward_list.TestForwardListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/forward_list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentForwardListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/list.TestListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/queue.TestQueueFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/stack.TestStackFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector.TestVectorFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector-bool.TestVectorBoolFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentVectorFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector-of-vectors.TestVectorOfVectorsFromStdModule.py

https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/45301/

show more ...

[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare

Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which go

[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare

Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374

show more ...

[clang-tidy] Add a Standalone diagnostics mode to clang-tidy

Adds a flag to `ClangTidyContext` that is used to indicate to checks that fixes will only be applied one at a time.
This is to indicate t

[clang-tidy] Add a Standalone diagnostics mode to clang-tidy

Adds a flag to `ClangTidyContext` that is used to indicate to checks that fixes will only be applied one at a time.
This is to indicate to checks that each fix emitted should not depend on any other fixes emitted across the translation unit.
I've currently implemented the `IncludeInserter`, `LoopConvertCheck` and `PreferMemberInitializerCheck` to use these support these modes.

Reasoning behind this is in use cases like `clangd` it's only possible to apply one fix at a time.
For include inserter checks, the include is only added once for the first diagnostic that requires it, this will result in subsequent fixes not having the included needed.

A similar issue is seen in the `PreferMemberInitializerCheck` where the `:` will only be added for the first member that needs fixing.

Fixes emitted in `StandaloneDiagsMode` will likely result in malformed code if they are applied all together, conversely fixes currently emitted may result in malformed code if they are applied one at a time.
For this reason invoking `clang-tidy` from the binary will always with `StandaloneDiagsMode` disabled, However using it as a library its possible to select the mode you wish to use, `clangd` always selects `StandaloneDiagsMode`.

This is an example of the current behaviour failing
```lang=c++
struct Foo {
int A, B;
Foo(int D, int E) {
A = D;
B = E; // Fix Here
}
};
```
Incorrectly transformed to:
```lang=c++
struct Foo {
int A, B;
Foo(int D, int E), B(E) {
A = D;
// Fix Here
}
};
```
In `StandaloneDiagsMode`, it gets transformed to:
```lang=c++
struct Foo {
int A, B;
Foo(int D, int E) : B(E) {
A = D;
// Fix Here
}
};
```

Reviewed By: sammccall

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97121

show more ...

[clang-tidy] Fix false positive in modernize-pass-by-value

The check should not trigger on lvalue/rvalue overload pairs:

```
struct S {
S(const A& a) : a(a) {}
S(A&& a) : a(std::move(a)) {}

[clang-tidy] Fix false positive in modernize-pass-by-value

The check should not trigger on lvalue/rvalue overload pairs:

```
struct S {
S(const A& a) : a(a) {}
S(A&& a) : a(std::move(a)) {}

A a;
}
```

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116535

show more ...

Don't offer partial fix-its for `modernize-pass-by-value`

This commit improves the fix-its of modernize-pass-by-value by
no longer proposing partial fixes. In the presence of using/typedef,
we faile

Don't offer partial fix-its for `modernize-pass-by-value`

This commit improves the fix-its of modernize-pass-by-value by
no longer proposing partial fixes. In the presence of using/typedef,
we failed to rewrite the function signature but still adjusted the
function body. This led to incorrect, partial fix-its. Instead, the
check now simply doesn't offer any fixes at all in such a situation.

show more ...

[clang-tidy] Fix lint warnings in clang-tidy source code (NFC)

Run clang-tidy on all source files under `clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy`
with `-header-filter=clang-tidy.*` and make suggested correctio

[clang-tidy] Fix lint warnings in clang-tidy source code (NFC)

Run clang-tidy on all source files under `clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy`
with `-header-filter=clang-tidy.*` and make suggested corrections.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112864

show more ...

Remove references to the ast_type_traits namespace

Follow up to cd62511496938e33c061c90796dd23a5288ff843 /
https://reviews.llvm.org/D74499

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https:/

Remove references to the ast_type_traits namespace

Follow up to cd62511496938e33c061c90796dd23a5288ff843 /
https://reviews.llvm.org/D74499

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92994

show more ...

[clang-tidy] IncludeInserter: allow <> in header name

This adds a pair of overloads for create(MainFile)?IncludeInsertion methods that
use the presence of the <> in the file name to control whether

[clang-tidy] IncludeInserter: allow <> in header name

This adds a pair of overloads for create(MainFile)?IncludeInsertion methods that
use the presence of the <> in the file name to control whether the #include
directive will use angle brackets or quotes. Motivating examples:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D82089#inline-789412 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/MakeSmartPtrCheck.cpp#L433

The overloads with the IsAngled parameter can be removed after the users are
updated.

Update usages of createIncludeInsertion.

Update (almost all) usages of createMainFileIncludeInsertion.

Reviewed By: hokein

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85666

show more ...

[clang-tidy] Refactor IncludeInserter

Simplified how `IncludeInserter` is used in Checks by abstracting away the SourceManager and PPCallbacks inside the method `registerPreprocessor`.
Changed check

[clang-tidy] Refactor IncludeInserter

Simplified how `IncludeInserter` is used in Checks by abstracting away the SourceManager and PPCallbacks inside the method `registerPreprocessor`.
Changed checks that use `IncludeInserter` to no longer use a `std::unique_ptr`, instead the IncludeInserter is just a member of the class thats initialized with an `IncludeStyle`.
Saving an unnecessary allocation.

This results in the removal of the field `IncludeSorter::IncludeStyle` from the checks, as its wrapped in the `IncludeInserter`.
No longer need to create an instance of the `IncludeInserter` in the registerPPCallbacks, now that method only needs to contain:
```
Inserter.registerPreprocessor(PP);
```
Also added a helper method to `IncludeInserter` called `createMainFileInclusionInsertion`, purely sugar but does better express intentions.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83680

show more ...

[clang-tidy] Reworked enum options handling(again)

Reland b9306fd after fixing the issue causing mac builds to fail unittests.

Following on from D77085, I was never happy with the passing a mapping

[clang-tidy] Reworked enum options handling(again)

Reland b9306fd after fixing the issue causing mac builds to fail unittests.

Following on from D77085, I was never happy with the passing a mapping to the option get/store functions. This patch addresses this by using explicit specializations to handle the serializing and deserializing of enum options.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82188

show more ...

Revert "[clang-tidy] relanding b9306fd"

This reverts commit 37cc4fa2eaa3d03ca8cd4947eb0d4c60e3c9b45c. More investigation needed

[clang-tidy] relanding b9306fd

Added some sanity checks to figure out the cause of a (seemingly unrelated) test failure on mac.
These can be removed should no issues arise on that platform again.

Revert "[clang-tidy] Reworked enum options handling(again)"

This reverts commit b9306fd042ce1c11d84f05d2124dfdc65b8331fe
and follow-up 42a51587c79a673045aec3586f4070630e5e7af3.

It seems to build ch

Revert "[clang-tidy] Reworked enum options handling(again)"

This reverts commit b9306fd042ce1c11d84f05d2124dfdc65b8331fe
and follow-up 42a51587c79a673045aec3586f4070630e5e7af3.

It seems to build check-clang-tools on macOS, see comments on
https://reviews.llvm.org/D82188

show more ...

[clang-tidy] Reworked enum options handling(again)

Following on from D77085, I was never happy with the passing a mapping to the option get/store functions. This patch addresses this by using explic

[clang-tidy] Reworked enum options handling(again)

Following on from D77085, I was never happy with the passing a mapping to the option get/store functions. This patch addresses this by using explicit specializations to handle the serializing and deserializing of enum options.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82188

show more ...

[NFC] Simplify IncludeInsertions appending to diagnostics

Set traversal explicitly where needed in clang-tidy

Reviewers: aaron.ballman

Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton, arphaman, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72

Set traversal explicitly where needed in clang-tidy

Reviewers: aaron.ballman

Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton, arphaman, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72530

show more ...

[clang-tidy] Convert config options that are bools to use the bool overload of get(GlobalOrLocal)?

Summary: This was done with a script that looks for calls to Options.get(GlobalOrLocal) that take a

[clang-tidy] Convert config options that are bools to use the bool overload of get(GlobalOrLocal)?

Summary: This was done with a script that looks for calls to Options.get(GlobalOrLocal) that take an integer for the second argument and the result is either compared not equal to 0 or implicitly converted to bool. There may be other occurances

Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, gribozavr2

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Subscribers: wuzish, nemanjai, xazax.hun, kbarton, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77831

show more ...

[clang-tidy] Change checks that take enum configurations to use a new access method.

Summary: Change all checks that take enums as configuration to use enum specific methods in `ClangTidyCheck::Opti

[clang-tidy] Change checks that take enum configurations to use a new access method.

Summary: Change all checks that take enums as configuration to use enum specific methods in `ClangTidyCheck::OptionsView`.

Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Subscribers: wuzish, nemanjai, kbarton, arphaman, xazax.hun, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76606

show more ...