Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init |
|
#
7d2ea6c4 |
| 14-Jan-2023 |
Carlos Galvez <carlosgalvezp@gmail.com> |
[clang-tidy][NFC] Use C++17 nested namespaces in the clang-tidy folder
Fix applied by running:
run-clang-tidy.py -checks=-*,modernize-concat-nested-namespaces
Differential Revision: https://review
[clang-tidy][NFC] Use C++17 nested namespaces in the clang-tidy folder
Fix applied by running:
run-clang-tidy.py -checks=-*,modernize-concat-nested-namespaces
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141770
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init |
|
#
f3db1aad |
| 10-Jan-2020 |
Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre@debian.org> |
MakeUniqueCheck.cpp: explicit the fact that there is an autofix for this checker
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1 |
|
#
2946cd70 |
| 19-Jan-2019 |
Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> |
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the ne
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc2 |
|
#
670c6315 |
| 21-Mar-2018 |
Alexander Kornienko <alexfh@google.com> |
[clang-tidy][modernize-make-unique] Checks c++14 flag before using std::make_unique
Summary: For a c++11 code, the clang-tidy rule "modernize-make-unique" should return immediately, as std::make_uni
[clang-tidy][modernize-make-unique] Checks c++14 flag before using std::make_unique
Summary: For a c++11 code, the clang-tidy rule "modernize-make-unique" should return immediately, as std::make_unique is not supported.
Reviewers: hokein, aaron.ballman, ilya-biryukov, alexfh
Reviewed By: hokein, aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: Quuxplusone, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Patch by Frederic Tingaud!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43766
llvm-svn: 328101
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-5.0.2-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.0, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.1, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.0, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc2 |
|
#
7b9c117b |
| 02-Aug-2017 |
Manuel Klimek <klimek@google.com> |
Adapt clang-tidy checks to changing semantics of hasDeclaration.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36154
llvm-svn: 309810
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-5.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.1, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc2 |
|
#
c321a4f2 |
| 17-May-2017 |
Alexander Kornienko <alexfh@google.com> |
[clang-tidy] Replace matchesName with hasName where no regex is needed
llvm-svn: 303263
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-4.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.0, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.9.1, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.9.0, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.8.1, llvmorg-3.8.1-rc1 |
|
#
ce18ade4 |
| 02-May-2016 |
Piotr Padlewski <piotr.padlewski@gmail.com> |
[clang-tidy] Add modernize-make-shared check
Because modernize-make-shared do almost the same job as modernize-make-unique, I refactored common code to MakeSmartPtrCheck.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D1
[clang-tidy] Add modernize-make-shared check
Because modernize-make-shared do almost the same job as modernize-make-unique, I refactored common code to MakeSmartPtrCheck.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19183
llvm-svn: 268253
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.8.0, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.7.1, llvmorg-3.7.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.7.1-rc1 |
|
#
3d7d9228 |
| 04-Nov-2015 |
Angel Garcia Gomez <angelgarcia@google.com> |
Improve modernize-make-unique matcher.
Summary: "std::unique_ptr<int>" is not the same type as "std::unique_ptr<int, std::default_delete<int>>", unless we insert a "hasCanonicalType" in the middle.
Improve modernize-make-unique matcher.
Summary: "std::unique_ptr<int>" is not the same type as "std::unique_ptr<int, std::default_delete<int>>", unless we insert a "hasCanonicalType" in the middle. Probably it also happens in other cases related to default template argument.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14291
llvm-svn: 252041
show more ...
|
#
37ab7fda |
| 22-Oct-2015 |
Angel Garcia Gomez <angelgarcia@google.com> |
Correctly print the type in modernize-make-unique.
Summary: Take into account the current LangOptions the check has to add back the template argument.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-co
Correctly print the type in modernize-make-unique.
Summary: Take into account the current LangOptions the check has to add back the template argument.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13983
llvm-svn: 251013
show more ...
|
#
146b96df |
| 22-Oct-2015 |
Angel Garcia Gomez <angelgarcia@google.com> |
Make string constants in the modernize module static.
Summary: Add static to global variables, if they are not in an anonymous namespace.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential R
Make string constants in the modernize module static.
Summary: Add static to global variables, if they are not in an anonymous namespace.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13975
llvm-svn: 251005
show more ...
|
#
baf573eb |
| 14-Oct-2015 |
Angel Garcia Gomez <angelgarcia@google.com> |
Support every kind of initialization.
Summary: modernize-make-unique now correctly supports the different kinds of list initialization.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differen
Support every kind of initialization.
Summary: modernize-make-unique now correctly supports the different kinds of list initialization.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13590
llvm-svn: 250283
show more ...
|
#
b9f30595 |
| 05-Oct-2015 |
Angel Garcia Gomez <angelgarcia@google.com> |
Use better mocks in modernize-make-unique, and fix matcher.
Summary: Add the second template argument to the unique_ptr mock, and update the matcher so that it only matches against cases where the s
Use better mocks in modernize-make-unique, and fix matcher.
Summary: Add the second template argument to the unique_ptr mock, and update the matcher so that it only matches against cases where the second argument is the default.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13433
llvm-svn: 249305
show more ...
|
#
26fd0e8b |
| 29-Sep-2015 |
Angel Garcia Gomez <angelgarcia@google.com> |
Create modernize-make-unique check.
Summary: create a check that replaces 'std::unique_ptr<type>(new type(args...))' with 'std::make_unique<type>(args...)'. It was on the list of "Ideas for new Tool
Create modernize-make-unique check.
Summary: create a check that replaces 'std::unique_ptr<type>(new type(args...))' with 'std::make_unique<type>(args...)'. It was on the list of "Ideas for new Tools". It needs to be tested more carefully, but first I wanted to know if you think it is worth the effort.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13166
llvm-svn: 248785
show more ...
|