History log of /llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/LoopConvertCheck.cpp (Results 1 – 25 of 93)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1
# 11b95dea 18-Sep-2024 Congcong Cai <congcongcai0907@163.com>

[clang-tidy][NFC] fix typo in clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/LoopConvertCheck.cpp


Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6
# f841ca0c 13-May-2024 Kazu Hirata <kazu@google.com>

Use StringRef::operator== instead of StringRef::equals (NFC) (#91864)

I'm planning to remove StringRef::equals in favor of
StringRef::operator==.

- StringRef::operator==/!= outnumber StringRef::

Use StringRef::operator== instead of StringRef::equals (NFC) (#91864)

I'm planning to remove StringRef::equals in favor of
StringRef::operator==.

- StringRef::operator==/!= outnumber StringRef::equals by a factor of
276 under llvm-project/ in terms of their usage.

- The elimination of StringRef::equals brings StringRef closer to
std::string_view, which has operator== but not equals.

- S == "foo" is more readable than S.equals("foo"), especially for
!Long.Expression.equals("str") vs Long.Expression != "str".

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3
# 11a411a4 31-Mar-2024 Piotr Zegar <me@piotrzegar.pl>

Revert "[clang-tidy][NFC] Remove duplicated code"

This reverts commit b6f6be4b500ff64c23a5103ac3311cb74519542f.


# b6f6be4b 31-Mar-2024 Piotr Zegar <me@piotrzegar.pl>

[clang-tidy][NFC] Remove duplicated code

Remove duplicated matchers by moving some of them to
utils/Matchers.h. Add some anonymous namespaces and
renamed some code to avoid ODR issues.


Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3
# 5e83b265 18-Feb-2024 Danny Mösch <danny.moesch@icloud.com>

[clang-tidy] Keep parentheses when replacing index access in `sizeof` calls (#82166)

Fixes #56021.


Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init
# 296fbee5 20-Jan-2024 Piotr Zegar <me@piotrzegar.pl>

[clang-tidy] Fix crash in modernize-loop-convert when int is used as iterator (#78796)

Fix crash when built-in type (like int) is used as iterator, or when
call to begin() return integer.

Closes

[clang-tidy] Fix crash in modernize-loop-convert when int is used as iterator (#78796)

Fix crash when built-in type (like int) is used as iterator, or when
call to begin() return integer.

Closes #78381

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3
# 5ae5af1d 16-Oct-2023 Congcong Cai <congcongcai0907@163.com>

[clang-tidy][modernize-loop-convert]check isDependentSizedArrayType (#69062)


Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4
# 26f230fe 27-Aug-2023 Piotr Zegar <me@piotrzegar.pl>

[clang-tidy][NFC] Fix llvm-else-after-return findings

Fix issues found by clang-tidy in clang-tidy source directory.


# cbdc3e1b 27-Aug-2023 Piotr Zegar <me@piotrzegar.pl>

[clang-tidy][NFC] Fix cppcoreguidelines-init-variables findings

Fix issues found by clang-tidy in clang-tidy source directory.


# 01c8bf6f 27-Aug-2023 Piotr Zegar <me@piotrzegar.pl>

[clang-tidy][NFC] Fix llvm-else-after-return findings

Fix issues found by clang-tidy in clang-tidy source directory.


# ec5f4be4 26-Aug-2023 Piotr Zegar <me@piotrzegar.pl>

[clang-tidy][NFC] Fix modernize-return-braced-init-list findings

Fix issues found by clang-tidy in clang-tidy source directory.


Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2
# c0abd381 07-Aug-2023 Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr@gmail.com>

[clang-tidy] Remove 'const' qualifiers on return types that do nothing


# 6a1f8ef8 05-Aug-2023 Chris Cotter <ccotter14@bloomberg.net>

[clang-tidy] Support begin/end free functions in modernize-loop-convert

The modernize-loop-convert check will now match iterator based loops
that call the free functions 'begin'/'end', as well as ma

[clang-tidy] Support begin/end free functions in modernize-loop-convert

The modernize-loop-convert check will now match iterator based loops
that call the free functions 'begin'/'end', as well as matching the
free function 'size' on containers.

Test plan: Added unit test cases matching free function calls on
containers, and a single negative test case for length() which is not
supported.

Reviewed By: PiotrZSL

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140760

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init
# dc4359fe 14-Jun-2023 AMS21 <AMS21.github@gmail.com>

[clang-tidy] Fix wrong code generation for `modernize-loop-convert` with structured bindings.

Fixes llvm#62951

Reviewed By: PiotrZSL

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152852


Revision tags: llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4
# 7f28137b 13-May-2023 Kazu Hirata <kazu@google.com>

[clang-tidy] Modernize RangeDescriptor (NFC)


Revision tags: llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init
# 7d2ea6c4 14-Jan-2023 Carlos Galvez <carlosgalvezp@gmail.com>

[clang-tidy][NFC] Use C++17 nested namespaces in the clang-tidy folder

Fix applied by running:

run-clang-tidy.py -checks=-*,modernize-concat-nested-namespaces

Differential Revision: https://review

[clang-tidy][NFC] Use C++17 nested namespaces in the clang-tidy folder

Fix applied by running:

run-clang-tidy.py -checks=-*,modernize-concat-nested-namespaces

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141770

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-15.0.7
# e4329520 10-Jan-2023 Chris Cotter <ccotter14@bloomberg.net>

[clang-tidy] Match derived types in in modernize-loop-convert

This patch allows clang-tidy to replace traditional for-loops where the
container type inherits its `begin`/`end` methods from a base cl

[clang-tidy] Match derived types in in modernize-loop-convert

This patch allows clang-tidy to replace traditional for-loops where the
container type inherits its `begin`/`end` methods from a base class.

Test plan: Added unit test cases that confirm the tool replaces the new
pattern.

Reviewed By: carlosgalvezp

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140307

show more ...


# 984b800a 09-Jan-2023 serge-sans-paille <sguelton@mozilla.com>

Move from llvm::makeArrayRef to ArrayRef deduction guides - last part

This is a follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D140896, split into
several parts as it touches a lot of files.

Differential Re

Move from llvm::makeArrayRef to ArrayRef deduction guides - last part

This is a follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D140896, split into
several parts as it touches a lot of files.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141298

show more ...


# f71ffd3b 08-Jan-2023 Kazu Hirata <kazu@google.com>

[clang-tools-extra] Use std::optional instead of llvm::Optional (NFC)

This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<. I'll post
a separate patch to clean up the "using" declarations, #i

[clang-tools-extra] Use std::optional instead of llvm::Optional (NFC)

This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<. I'll post
a separate patch to clean up the "using" declarations, #include
"llvm/ADT/Optional.h", etc.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

show more ...


# 71f55735 08-Jan-2023 Kazu Hirata <kazu@google.com>

[clang-tools-extra] Add #include <optional> (NFC)

This patch adds #include <optional> to those files containing
llvm::Optional<...> or Optional<...>.

I'll post a separate patch to actually replace

[clang-tools-extra] Add #include <optional> (NFC)

This patch adds #include <optional> to those files containing
llvm::Optional<...> or Optional<...>.

I'll post a separate patch to actually replace llvm::Optional with
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

show more ...


# 7e937d08 15-Dec-2022 Kazu Hirata <kazu@google.com>

Don't include StringSwitch (NFC)

These files do not use llvm::StringSwitch.


Revision tags: llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1
# 15f3cd6b 11-Oct-2021 Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare

Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which go

[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare

Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

---

Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:

1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
print types as written. There are customization options there, but
not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
the so called canonical types.
Example:
```
namespace foo {
struct A {};
A a;
};
```
If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
will make it print it accurately even when written without
qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.

2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
the name of the canonical type is the better choice.

3) This patch could expose a bug in how you get the source range of some
TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
dealing with will always include some source location.

4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
`dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.

5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.

Let me know if you need any help!

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374

show more ...


# 888673b6 15-Jul-2022 Jonas Devlieghere <jonas@devlieghere.com>

Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"

This reverts commit 7c51f02effdbd0d5e12bfd26f9c3b2ab5687c93f because it
stills breaks the LLDB tests. This was re-landed wi

Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"

This reverts commit 7c51f02effdbd0d5e12bfd26f9c3b2ab5687c93f because it
stills breaks the LLDB tests. This was re-landed without addressing the
issue or even agreement on how to address the issue. More details and
discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374.

show more ...


# 7c51f02e 11-Oct-2021 Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare

Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which go

[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare

Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

---

Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:

1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
print types as written. There are customization options there, but
not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
the so called canonical types.
Example:
```
namespace foo {
struct A {};
A a;
};
```
If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
will make it print it accurately even when written without
qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.

2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
the name of the canonical type is the better choice.

3) This patch could exposed a bug in how you get the source range of some
TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
dealing with will always include some source location.

4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
`dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.

5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.

Let me know if you need any help!

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374

show more ...


# 3968936b 13-Jul-2022 Jonas Devlieghere <jonas@devlieghere.com>

Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"

This reverts commit bdc6974f92304f4ed542241b9b89ba58ba6b20aa because it
breaks all the LLDB tests that import the std module

Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"

This reverts commit bdc6974f92304f4ed542241b9b89ba58ba6b20aa because it
breaks all the LLDB tests that import the std module.

import-std-module/array.TestArrayFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/deque-basic.TestDequeFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/deque-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentDequeFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/forward_list.TestForwardListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/forward_list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentForwardListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/list.TestListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/queue.TestQueueFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/stack.TestStackFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector.TestVectorFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector-bool.TestVectorBoolFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentVectorFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector-of-vectors.TestVectorOfVectorsFromStdModule.py

https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/45301/

show more ...


1234