[clang-tidy][NFC] Use C++17 nested namespaces in the clang-tidy folder

Fix applied by running:

run-clang-tidy.py -checks=-*,modernize-concat-nested-namespaces

Differential Revision: https://review

[clang-tidy][NFC] Use C++17 nested namespaces in the clang-tidy folder

Fix applied by running:

run-clang-tidy.py -checks=-*,modernize-concat-nested-namespaces

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141770

show more ...

Use llvm::is_contained (NFC)

[clang-tidy] Fix lint warnings in clang-tidy source code (NFC)

Run clang-tidy on all source files under `clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy`
with `-header-filter=clang-tidy.*` and make suggested correctio

[clang-tidy] Fix lint warnings in clang-tidy source code (NFC)

Run clang-tidy on all source files under `clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy`
with `-header-filter=clang-tidy.*` and make suggested corrections.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112864

show more ...

[clang-tidy] Applied clang-tidy fixes. NFC

Applied fixes enabled by the LLVM's .clang-tidy configs. Reverted files where
fixes introduced compile errors:
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/hicpp/NoAssem

[clang-tidy] Applied clang-tidy fixes. NFC

Applied fixes enabled by the LLVM's .clang-tidy configs. Reverted files where
fixes introduced compile errors:
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/hicpp/NoAssemblerCheck.cpp
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/misc/ThrowByValueCatchByReferenceCheck.cpp

$ clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/
Enabled checks:
llvm-else-after-return
llvm-header-guard
llvm-include-order
llvm-namespace-comment
llvm-prefer-isa-or-dyn-cast-in-conditionals
llvm-prefer-register-over-unsigned
llvm-qualified-auto
llvm-twine-local
misc-definitions-in-headers
misc-misplaced-const
misc-new-delete-overloads
misc-no-recursion
misc-non-copyable-objects
misc-redundant-expression
misc-static-assert
misc-throw-by-value-catch-by-reference
misc-unconventional-assign-operator
misc-uniqueptr-reset-release
misc-unused-alias-decls
misc-unused-using-decls
readability-identifier-naming

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95614

show more ...

[clang-tools-extra] NFC: Fix trivial typo in documents and comments

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77458

[ADT][NFC] SCCIterator: Change hasLoop() to hasCycle()

[clang-tidy] misc-no-recursion: point to the function defs, not decls

Results in slightly better UX.
This actually was the initial intent, but it kinda got lost along the way.

[clang-tidy] misc-no-recursion: a new check

Summary:
Recursion is a powerful tool, but like any tool
without care it can be dangerous. For example,
if the recursion is unbounded, you will
eventually

[clang-tidy] misc-no-recursion: a new check

Summary:
Recursion is a powerful tool, but like any tool
without care it can be dangerous. For example,
if the recursion is unbounded, you will
eventually run out of stack and crash.

You can of course track the recursion depth
but if it is hardcoded, there can always be some
other environment when that depth is too large,
so said magic number would need to be env-dependent.
But then your program's behavior is suddenly more env-dependent.

Also, recursion, while it does not outright stop optimization,
recursive calls are less great than normal calls,
for example they hinder inlining.

Recursion is banned in some coding guidelines:
* SEI CERT DCL56-CPP. Avoid cycles during initialization of static objects
* JPL 2.4 Do not use direct or indirect recursion.
* I'd say it is frowned upon in LLVM, although not banned
And is plain unsupported in some cases:
* OpenCL 1.2, 6.9 Restrictions: i. Recursion is not supported.

So there's clearly a lot of reasons why one might want to
avoid recursion, and replace it with worklist handling.
It would be great to have a enforcement for it though.

This implements such a check.
Here we detect both direct and indirect recursive calls,
although since clang-tidy (unlike clang static analyzer)
is CTU-unaware, if the recursion transcends a single standalone TU,
we will naturally not find it :/

The algorithm is pretty straight-forward:
1. Build call-graph for the entire TU.
For that, the existing `clang::CallGraph` is re-used,
although it had to be modified to also track the location of the call.
2. Then, the hard problem: how do we detect recursion?
Since we have a graph, let's just do the sane thing,
and look for Strongly Connected Function Declarations - widely known as `SCC`.
For that LLVM provides `llvm::scc_iterator`,
which is internally an Tarjan's DFS algorithm, and is used throught LLVM,
so this should be as performant as possible.
3. Now that we've got SCC's, we discard those that don't contain loops.
Note that there may be more than one loop in SCC!
4. For each loopy SCC, we call out each function, and print a single example
call graph that shows recursion -- it didn't seem worthwhile enumerating
every possible loop in SCC, although i suppose it could be implemented.
* To come up with that call graph cycle example, we start at first SCC node,
see which callee of the node is within SCC (and is thus known to be in cycle),
and recurse into it until we hit the callee that is already in call stack.

Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman, ffrankies, Eugene.Zelenko, erichkeane, NoQ

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Subscribers: Charusso, Naghasan, bader, riccibruno, mgorny, Anastasia, xazax.hun, cfe-commits

Tags: #llvm, #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72362

show more ...