History log of /dpdk/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_arm64.c (Results 1 – 4 of 4)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v24.07-rc2, v24.07-rc1, v24.03, v24.03-rc4, v24.03-rc3, v24.03-rc2, v24.03-rc1
# 0e21c7c0 07-Dec-2023 David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>

lib: replace logging helpers

This is a preparation step before the next change.

Many libraries have their own logging helpers that do not add a newline
in their format string.
Some previous changes

lib: replace logging helpers

This is a preparation step before the next change.

Many libraries have their own logging helpers that do not add a newline
in their format string.
Some previous changes fixed places where some of those helpers are
called without a trailing newline.
Using RTE_LOG_LINE in the existing helpers will ensure we don't
introduce new issues in the future.

The problem is that if we simply convert to the RTE_LOG_LINE helper,
a future fix may introduce a regression since the logging helper
change won't be backported.

To address this concern, rename existing helpers: backporting a call to
them will trigger some conflict or build issue in LTS branches.

Note:
- bpf and vhost that still has some debug multilines messages, a direct
call to RTE_LOG/RTE_LOG_DP is used: this will make it easier to notice
such special cases,
- about previously publicly exposed logging helpers, when such helper is
not publicly used (iow in public inline API), it is removed from the
public API (this is the case for the member library),

Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>

show more ...


Revision tags: v23.11, v23.11-rc4, v23.11-rc3, v23.11-rc2, v23.11-rc1, v23.07, v23.07-rc4, v23.07-rc3, v23.07-rc2, v23.07-rc1, v23.03, v23.03-rc4, v23.03-rc3
# cf095b1e 14-Mar-2023 J.J. Martzki <mars14850@gmail.com>

bpf: rename functions to avoid conflict with libpcap

The library libpcap has their function 'bpf_validate' either
so there would be a multiple definition issue when linking
with librte_bpf.a and lib

bpf: rename functions to avoid conflict with libpcap

The library libpcap has their function 'bpf_validate' either
so there would be a multiple definition issue when linking
with librte_bpf.a and libpcap.a statically
(Same as http://dpdk.org/patch/52631).
So just rename the function names to avoid such issue.

Signed-off-by: J.J. Martzki <mars14850@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>

show more ...


Revision tags: v23.03-rc2, v23.03-rc1, v22.11, v22.11-rc4, v22.11-rc3, v22.11-rc2, v22.11-rc1
# 72b452c5 27-Aug-2022 Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>

eal: remove unneeded includes from a public header

Do not include <ctype.h>, <errno.h>, and <stdlib.h> from <rte_common.h>,
because they are not used by this file.
Include the needed headers directl

eal: remove unneeded includes from a public header

Do not include <ctype.h>, <errno.h>, and <stdlib.h> from <rte_common.h>,
because they are not used by this file.
Include the needed headers directly from the files that need them.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v22.07, v22.07-rc4, v22.07-rc3, v22.07-rc2, v22.07-rc1, v22.03, v22.03-rc4, v22.03-rc3, v22.03-rc2, v22.03-rc1, v21.11, v21.11-rc4, v21.11-rc3, v21.11-rc2, v21.11-rc1, v21.08, v21.08-rc4, v21.08-rc3, v21.08-rc2, v21.08-rc1, v21.05, v21.05-rc4, v21.05-rc3, v21.05-rc2, v21.05-rc1
# 99a2dd95 20-Apr-2021 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

lib: remove librte_ prefix from directory names

There is no reason for the DPDK libraries to all have 'librte_' prefix on
the directory names. This prefix makes the directory names longer and also
m

lib: remove librte_ prefix from directory names

There is no reason for the DPDK libraries to all have 'librte_' prefix on
the directory names. This prefix makes the directory names longer and also
makes it awkward to add features referring to individual libraries in the
build - should the lib names be specified with or without the prefix.
Therefore, we can just remove the library prefix and use the library's
unique name as the directory name, i.e. 'eal' rather than 'librte_eal'

Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

show more ...