Revision tags: llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7 |
|
#
5cd42747 |
| 21-Dec-2024 |
Peter Hawkins <phawkins@google.com> |
[mlir python] Port in-tree dialects to nanobind. (#119924)
This is a companion to #118583, although it can be landed independently
because since #117922 dialects do not have to use the same Python
[mlir python] Port in-tree dialects to nanobind. (#119924)
This is a companion to #118583, although it can be landed independently
because since #117922 dialects do not have to use the same Python
binding framework as the Python core code.
This PR ports all of the in-tree dialect and pass extensions to
nanobind, with the exception of those that remain for testing pybind11
support.
This PR also:
* removes CollectDiagnosticsToStringScope from NanobindAdaptors.h. This
was overlooked in a previous PR and it is duplicated in Diagnostics.h.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacques Pienaar <jpienaar@google.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init |
|
#
681eacc1 |
| 15-Dec-2023 |
martin-luecke <martin.luecke@ed.ac.uk> |
[MLIR][transform][python] add sugared python abstractions for transform dialect (#75073)
This adds Python abstractions for the different handle types of the
transform dialect
The abstractions al
[MLIR][transform][python] add sugared python abstractions for transform dialect (#75073)
This adds Python abstractions for the different handle types of the
transform dialect
The abstractions allow for straightforward chaining of transforms by
calling their member functions.
As an initial PR for this infrastructure, only a single transform is
included: `transform.structured.match`.
With a future `tile` transform abstraction an example of the usage is:
```Python
def script(module: OpHandle):
module.match_ops(MatchInterfaceEnum.TilingInterface).tile(tile_sizes=[32,32])
```
to generate the following IR:
```mlir
%0 = transform.structured.match interface{TilingInterface} in %arg0
%tiled_op, %loops = transform.structured.tile_using_for %0 [32, 32]
```
These abstractions are intended to enhance the usability and flexibility
of the transform dialect by providing an accessible interface that
allows for easy assembly of complex transformation chains.
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4 |
|
#
285a229f |
| 20-Oct-2023 |
Mehdi Amini <joker.eph@gmail.com> |
[MLIR] Apply clang-tidy fixes for misc-include-cleaner (NFC)
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2 |
|
#
97f9f1a0 |
| 26-Sep-2023 |
martin-luecke <martin.luecke@ed.ac.uk> |
[mlir][python] Expose transform param types (#67421)
This exposes the Transform dialect types `AnyParamType` and `ParamType`
via the Python bindings.
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3 |
|
#
8b134d0b |
| 10-Aug-2023 |
Ingo Müller <ingomueller@google.com> |
[mlir][transform][python] Add AnyValueType to bindings.
This patch adds the MLIR C bindings and the corresponding Python bindings of the AnyValueType of the transform dialect.
Reviewed By: springer
[mlir][transform][python] Add AnyValueType to bindings.
This patch adds the MLIR C bindings and the corresponding Python bindings of the AnyValueType of the transform dialect.
Reviewed By: springerm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157638
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5 |
|
#
bfb1ba75 |
| 26-May-2023 |
max <maksim.levental@gmail.com> |
[MLIR][python bindings] Add TypeCaster for returning refined types from python APIs
depends on D150839
This diff uses `MlirTypeID` to register `TypeCaster`s (i.e., `[](PyType pyType) -> DerivedTy {
[MLIR][python bindings] Add TypeCaster for returning refined types from python APIs
depends on D150839
This diff uses `MlirTypeID` to register `TypeCaster`s (i.e., `[](PyType pyType) -> DerivedTy { return pyType; }`) for all concrete types (i.e., `PyConcrete<...>`) that are then queried for (by `MlirTypeID`) and called in `struct type_caster<MlirType>::cast`. The result is that anywhere an `MlirType mlirType` is returned from a python binding, that `mlirType` is automatically cast to the correct concrete type. For example:
``` c0 = arith.ConstantOp(f32, 0.0) # CHECK: F32Type(f32) print(repr(c0.result.type))
unranked_tensor_type = UnrankedTensorType.get(f32) unranked_tensor = tensor.FromElementsOp(unranked_tensor_type, [c0]).result
# CHECK: UnrankedTensorType print(type(unranked_tensor.type).__name__) # CHECK: UnrankedTensorType(tensor<*xf32>) print(repr(unranked_tensor.type)) ```
This functionality immediately extends to typed attributes (i.e., `attr.type`).
The diff also implements similar functionality for `mlir_type_subclass`es but in a slightly different way - for such types (which have no cpp corresponding `class` or `struct`) the user must provide a type caster in python (similar to how `AttrBuilder` works) or in cpp as a `py::cpp_function`.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150927
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3 |
|
#
3e1f6d02 |
| 10-Oct-2022 |
Alex Zinenko <zinenko@google.com> |
[mlir] add OperationType to the Transform dialect
Add a new OperationType handle type to the Transform dialect. This transform type is parameterized by the name of the payload operation it can point
[mlir] add OperationType to the Transform dialect
Add a new OperationType handle type to the Transform dialect. This transform type is parameterized by the name of the payload operation it can point to. It is intended as a constraint on transformations that are only applicable to a specific kind of payload operations. If a transformation is applicable to a small set of operation classes, it can be wrapped into a transform op by using a disjunctive constraint, such as `Type<Or<[Transform_ConcreteOperation<"foo">.predicate, Transform_ConcreteOperation<"bar">.predicate]>>` for its operand without modifying this type. Broader sets of accepted operations should be modeled as specific types.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135586
show more ...
|