History log of /llvm-project/llvm/unittests/Transforms/Utils/CodeMoverUtilsTest.cpp (Results 1 – 16 of 16)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
# 74deadf1 29-Jun-2024 Nikita Popov <llvm@npopov.com>

[IRBuilder] Don't include Module.h (NFC) (#97159)

This used to be necessary to fetch the DataLayout, but isn't anymore.


Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4
# b0662a7a 10-Apr-2024 Congzhe <congzhe.cao@huawei.com>

[CodeMoverUtils] Enhance CodeMoverUtils to sink an entire BB (#87857)

When moving an entire basic block after `InsertPoint`, currently we
check each instruction whether their users are dominated by

[CodeMoverUtils] Enhance CodeMoverUtils to sink an entire BB (#87857)

When moving an entire basic block after `InsertPoint`, currently we
check each instruction whether their users are dominated by
`InsertPoint`, however, this can be improved such that even a user is
not dominated by `InsertPoint`, as long as it appears as a subsequent
instruction in the same BB, it is safe to move.

This patch is similar to commit 751be2a064f119af74c7b9b1e52bc904d8aa114d
that enhanced hoisting an entire BB, and this patch enhances sinking an
entire BB. Please refer to the added functionality in test case
`llvm/unittests/Transforms/Utils/CodeMoverUtilsTest.cpp` that was not
supported without this patch.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1
# c4277275 27-Sep-2021 Congzhe Cao <congzhe.cao@huawei.com>

[CodeMoverUtils] Enhance isSafeToMoveBefore() when control flow equivalence is satisfied

With improved analysis in determining CFG equivalence that does
not require strict dominance and post-dominan

[CodeMoverUtils] Enhance isSafeToMoveBefore() when control flow equivalence is satisfied

With improved analysis in determining CFG equivalence that does
not require strict dominance and post-dominance conditions, we
now relax isSafeToMoveBefore() such that an instruction I can
be moved before InsertPoint even if they do not strictly dominate
each other, as long as they follow the same control flow path.

For example, we can move Instruction 0 before Instruction 1,
and vice versa.

```
if (cond1)
// Instruction 0: %add = add i32 1, 2
if (cond1)
// Instruction 1: %add2 = add i32 2, 1
```

Reviewed By: Whitney

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110456

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4
# 751be2a0 24-Sep-2021 Congzhe Cao <congzhe.cao@huawei.com>

[CodeMoverUtils] Enhance isSafeToMoveBefore() when moving BBs

When moving an entire basic block BB before InsertPoint, currently
we check for all instructions whether the operands dominates
InsertPo

[CodeMoverUtils] Enhance isSafeToMoveBefore() when moving BBs

When moving an entire basic block BB before InsertPoint, currently
we check for all instructions whether the operands dominates
InsertPoint, however, this can be improved such that even an
operand does not dominate InsertPoint, as long as it appears as
a previous instruction in the same BB, it is safe to move.

Reviewed By: Whitney

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110378

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2
# 2ce38b3f 02-Dec-2020 dfukalov <daniil.fukalov@amd.com>

[NFC] Reduce include files dependency.

1. Removed #include "...AliasAnalysis.h" in other headers and modules.
2. Cleaned up includes in AliasAnalysis.h.

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Differential Revision:

[NFC] Reduce include files dependency.

1. Removed #include "...AliasAnalysis.h" in other headers and modules.
2. Cleaned up includes in AliasAnalysis.h.

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92489

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1
# 167cac31 22-Jul-2020 SharmaRithik <rithiksh02@gmail.com>

[CodeMoverUtils] Add more data dependency related test case
Summary: This patch adds more test case focusing on data dependency.
Authored By: RithikSharma
Reviewer: Whitney, bmahjour, etiotto
Reviewe

[CodeMoverUtils] Add more data dependency related test case
Summary: This patch adds more test case focusing on data dependency.
Authored By: RithikSharma
Reviewer: Whitney, bmahjour, etiotto
Reviewed By: Whitney
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83543

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4
# 082e3952 07-Jul-2020 SharmaRithik <rithiksh02@gmail.com>

[CodeMoverUtils] Make specific analysis dependent checks optional

Summary: This patch makes code motion checks optional which are dependent on
specific analysis example, dominator tree, post dominat

[CodeMoverUtils] Make specific analysis dependent checks optional

Summary: This patch makes code motion checks optional which are dependent on
specific analysis example, dominator tree, post dominator tree and dependence
info. The aim is to make the adoption of CodeMoverUtils easier for clients that
don't use analysis which were strictly required by CodeMoverUtils. This will
also help in diversifying code motion checks using other analysis example MSSA.
Authored By: RithikSharma
Reviewer: Whitney, bmahjour, etiotto
Reviewed By: Whitney
Subscribers: Prazek, hiraditya, george.burgess.iv, asbirlea, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82566

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2
# 3642d388 07-Jun-2020 Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk>

DependenceAnalysis.h - reduce AliasAnalysis.h include to forward declaration. NFC.

This requires the replacement of legacy class AliasAnalysis usages with AAResults (which it typedefs to anyhow)


# eadf2959 27-May-2020 Rithik Sharma <rithiksh02@gmail.com>

[CodeMoverUtils] Use dominator tree level to decide the direction of
code motion

Summary: Currently isSafeToMoveBefore uses DFS numbering for determining
the relative position of instruction and ins

[CodeMoverUtils] Use dominator tree level to decide the direction of
code motion

Summary: Currently isSafeToMoveBefore uses DFS numbering for determining
the relative position of instruction and insert point which is not
always correct. This PR proposes the use of Dominator Tree depth for the
same. If a node is at a higher level than the insert point then it is
safe to say that we want to move in the forward direction.
Authored By: RithikSharma
Reviewer: Whitney, nikic, bmahjour, etiotto, fhahn
Reviewed By: Whitney
Subscribers: fhahn, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80084

show more ...


# bcbd26bf 20-May-2020 Florian Hahn <flo@fhahn.com>

[SCEV] Move ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp to Transforms/Utils (NFC).

SCEVExpander modifies the underlying function so it is more suitable in
Transforms/Utils, rather than Analysis. This allows using o

[SCEV] Move ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp to Transforms/Utils (NFC).

SCEVExpander modifies the underlying function so it is more suitable in
Transforms/Utils, rather than Analysis. This allows using other
transform utils in SCEVExpander.

This patch was originally committed as b8a3c34eee06, but broke the
modules build, as LoopAccessAnalysis was using the Expander.

The code-gen part of LAA was moved to lib/Transforms recently, so this
patch can be landed again.

Reviewers: sanjoy.google, efriedma, reames

Reviewed By: sanjoy.google

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71537

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1
# 78dc6498 28-Jan-2020 Whitney Tsang <whitneyt@ca.ibm.com>

[CodeMoverUtils] Improve IsControlFlowEquivalent.

Summary:
Currently IsControlFlowEquivalent determine if two blocks are control
flow equivalent by checking if A dominates B and B post dominates A.

[CodeMoverUtils] Improve IsControlFlowEquivalent.

Summary:
Currently IsControlFlowEquivalent determine if two blocks are control
flow equivalent by checking if A dominates B and B post dominates A.
There exists blocks that are control flow equivalent even if they don't
satisfy the A dominates B and B post dominates A condition.
For example,

if (cond)
A
if (cond)
B
In the PR, we determine if two blocks are control flow equivalent by
also checking if the two sets of conditions A and B depends on are
equivalent.
Reviewer: jdoerfert, Meinersbur, dmgreen, etiotto, bmahjour, fhahn,
hfinkel, kbarton
Reviewed By: fhahn
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71578

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-11-init
# b8a3c34e 04-Jan-2020 Florian Hahn <flo@fhahn.com>

Revert "[SCEV] Move ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp to Transforms/Utils (NFC)."

This reverts commit 51ef53f3bd23559203fe9af82ff2facbfedc1db3, as it
breaks some bots.


# 51ef53f3 04-Jan-2020 Florian Hahn <flo@fhahn.com>

[SCEV] Move ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp to Transforms/Utils (NFC).

SCEVExpander modifies the underlying function so it is more suitable in
Transforms/Utils, rather than Analysis. This allows using o

[SCEV] Move ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp to Transforms/Utils (NFC).

SCEVExpander modifies the underlying function so it is more suitable in
Transforms/Utils, rather than Analysis. This allows using other
transform utils in SCEVExpander.

Reviewers: sanjoy.google, efriedma, reames

Reviewed By: sanjoy.google

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71537

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2
# 5e40f2cf 27-Nov-2019 Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka@google.com>

[CodeMoverUtils] clang-format the test


# ad58d1a9 27-Nov-2019 Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka@google.com>

[CodeMoverUtils] Don't dereference nullptr in test


Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1
# ae8a8c2d 22-Nov-2019 Tsang Whitney W.H <whitneyt@recycler.canlab.ibm.com>

[CodeMoverUtils] Added an API to check if an instruction can be safely
moved before another instruction.
Summary:Added an API to check if an instruction can be safely moved
before another instruction

[CodeMoverUtils] Added an API to check if an instruction can be safely
moved before another instruction.
Summary:Added an API to check if an instruction can be safely moved
before another instruction. In future PRs, we will like to add support
of moving instructions between blocks that are not control flow
equivalent, and add other APIs to enhance usability, e.g. moving basic
blocks, moving list of instructions...
Loop Fusion will be its first user. When there is intervening code in
between two loops, fusion is currently unable to fuse them. Loop Fusion
can use this utility to check if the intervening code can be safely
moved before or after the two loops, and move them, then it can
successfully fuse them.
Reviewer:kbarton,jdoerfert,Meinersbur,bmahjour,etiotto
Reviewed By:bmahjour
Subscribers:mgorny,hiraditya,llvm-commits
Tag:LLVM
Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D70049

show more ...