Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7 |
|
#
5a288fa3 |
| 13-Dec-2022 |
Nikita Popov <npopov@redhat.com> |
[DebugInfo] Convert most tests to opaque pointers (NFC)
|
#
b25ad383 |
| 08-Dec-2022 |
Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri@gmail.com> |
[NFC] Port all DebugInfo tests to `-passes=` syntax
|
#
b1a95848 |
| 08-Dec-2022 |
Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri@gmail.com> |
[opt] Disincentivize new tests from using old pass syntax
Over the past day or so, i've took a large swing at our tests, and reduced the number of tests that were still using the old syntax from ~18
[opt] Disincentivize new tests from using old pass syntax
Over the past day or so, i've took a large swing at our tests, and reduced the number of tests that were still using the old syntax from ~1800 to just 200.
Left to handle: (as it is seen in this patch) * Transforms/LSR * Transforms/CGP * Transforms/TypePromotion * Transforms/HardwareLoops * Analysis/* * some misc.
I think this is the right point to start actively refusing to honor the old syntax, except for the old tests, to prevent the old syntax from creeping back in.
Thus, let's add temporary default-off flag, and if it is not passed refuse to accept old syntax. The tests that still need porting are annotated with this flag.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139647
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2 |
|
#
2c864551 |
| 09-May-2018 |
Shiva Chen <shiva0217@gmail.com> |
[DebugInfo] Add DILabel metadata and intrinsic llvm.dbg.label.
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label nam
[DebugInfo] Add DILabel metadata and intrinsic llvm.dbg.label.
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly. We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format of DILabel is
!DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3)
We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block. The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out. The format of the intrinsic is
llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1)
It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter.
We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend. Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331841
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.0, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc2 |
|
#
b69e5b73 |
| 02-Feb-2018 |
Mikael Holmen <mikael.holmen@ericsson.com> |
[GlobalOpt] Include padding in debug fragments
Summary: When creating the debug fragments for a SRA'd variable, use the types' allocation sizes. This fixes issues where the pass would emit too small
[GlobalOpt] Include padding in debug fragments
Summary: When creating the debug fragments for a SRA'd variable, use the types' allocation sizes. This fixes issues where the pass would emit too small fragments, placed at the wrong offset, for padded types.
An example of this is long double on x86. The type is represented using x86_fp80, which is 10 bytes, but the value is aligned to 12/16 bytes. The padding is included in the type's DW_AT_byte_size attribute; therefore, the fragments should also include that. Newer GCC releases (I tested 7.2.0) emit 12/16-byte pieces for long double. Earlier releases, e.g. GCC 5.5.0, behaved as LLVM did, i.e. by emitting a 10-byte piece, followed by an empty 2/6-byte piece for the padding.
Failing to cover all `DW_AT_byte_size' bytes of a value with non-empty pieces results in the value being printed as <optimized out> by GDB.
Patch by: David Stenberg
Reviewers: aprantl, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: aprantl, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42807
llvm-svn: 324066
show more ...
|