[CodeGen] Convert some tests to opaque pointers (NFC)

[NVPTX] Convert tests to check 'target=nvptx.*'

Part of the project to eliminate special handling for triples in lit
expressions.

[NVPTX][tests] add "XFAIL: nvptx" for some tests

Some tests failed for NVPTX target, but it seems that NVPTX will be
fixed and the tests will pass. So, just mark the tests as XFAIL

Differential Rev

[NVPTX][tests] add "XFAIL: nvptx" for some tests

Some tests failed for NVPTX target, but it seems that NVPTX will be
fixed and the tests will pass. So, just mark the tests as XFAIL

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124125

show more ...

[opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to the call instruction

See r230786 and r230794 for similar changes to gep and load
respectively.

Call is a bit different be

[opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to the call instruction

See r230786 and r230794 for similar changes to gep and load
respectively.

Call is a bit different because it often doesn't have a single explicit
type - usually the type is deduced from the arguments, and just the
return type is explicit. In those cases there's no need to change the
IR.

When that's not the case, the IR usually contains the pointer type of
the first operand - but since typed pointers are going away, that
representation is insufficient so I'm just stripping the "pointerness"
of the explicit type away.

This does make the IR a bit weird - it /sort of/ reads like the type of
the first operand: "call void () %x(" but %x is actually of type "void
()*" and will eventually be just of type "ptr". But this seems not too
bad and I don't think it would benefit from repeating the type
("void (), void () * %x(" and then eventually "void (), ptr %x(") as has
been done with gep and load.

This also has a side benefit: since the explicit type is no longer a
pointer, there's no ambiguity between an explicit type and a function
that returns a function pointer. Previously this case needed an explicit
type (eg: a function returning a void() function was written as
"call void () () * @x(" rather than "call void () * @x(" because of the
ambiguity between a function returning a pointer to a void() function
and a function returning void).

No ambiguity means even function pointer return types can just be
written alone, without writing the whole function's type.

This leaves /only/ the varargs case where the explicit type is required.

Given the special type syntax in call instructions, the regex-fu used
for migration was a bit more involved in its own unique way (as every
one of these is) so here it is. Use it in conjunction with the apply.sh
script and associated find/xargs commands I've provided in rr230786 to
migrate your out of tree tests. Do let me know if any of this doesn't
cover your cases & we can iterate on a more general script/regexes to
help others with out of tree tests.

About 9 test cases couldn't be automatically migrated - half of those
were functions returning function pointers, where I just had to manually
delete the function argument types now that we didn't need an explicit
function type there. The other half were typedefs of function types used
in calls - just had to manually drop the * from those.

import fileinput
import sys
import re

pat = re.compile(r'((?:=|:|^|\s)call\s(?:[^@]*?))(\s*$|\s*(?:(?:\[\[[a-zA-Z0-9_]+\]\]|[@%](?:(")?[\\\?@a-zA-Z0-9_.]*?(?(3)"|)|{{.*}}))(?:\(|$)|undef|inttoptr|bitcast|null|asm).*$)')
addrspace_end = re.compile(r"addrspace\(\d+\)\s*\*$")
func_end = re.compile("(?:void.*|\)\s*)\*$")

def conv(match, line):
if not match or re.search(addrspace_end, match.group(1)) or not re.search(func_end, match.group(1)):
return line
return line[:match.start()] + match.group(1)[:match.group(1).rfind('*')].rstrip() + match.group(2) + line[match.end():]

for line in sys.stdin:
sys.stdout.write(conv(re.search(pat, line), line))

llvm-svn: 235145

show more ...

[opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to gep operator

Similar to gep (r230786) and load (r230794) changes.

Similar migration script can be used to update test cas

[opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to gep operator

Similar to gep (r230786) and load (r230794) changes.

Similar migration script can be used to update test cases, which
successfully migrated all of LLVM and Polly, but about 4 test cases
needed manually changes in Clang.

(this script will read the contents of stdin and massage it into stdout
- wrap it in the 'apply.sh' script shown in previous commits + xargs to
apply it over a large set of test cases)

import fileinput
import sys
import re

rep = re.compile(r"(getelementptr(?:\s+inbounds)?\s*\()((<\d*\s+x\s+)?([^@]*?)(|\s*addrspace\(\d+\))\s*\*(?(3)>)\s*)(?=$|%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|zeroinitializer|<|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{)", re.MULTILINE | re.DOTALL)

def conv(match):
line = match.group(1)
line += match.group(4)
line += ", "
line += match.group(2)
return line

line = sys.stdin.read()
off = 0
for match in re.finditer(rep, line):
sys.stdout.write(line[off:match.start()])
sys.stdout.write(conv(match))
off = match.end()
sys.stdout.write(line[off:])

llvm-svn: 232184

show more ...

Fixes PR8823: add-with-overflow-128.ll
In the bottom-up selection DAG scheduling, handle two-address
instructions that read/write unspillable registers. Treat
the entire chain of two-address nodes as

Fixes PR8823: add-with-overflow-128.ll
In the bottom-up selection DAG scheduling, handle two-address
instructions that read/write unspillable registers. Treat
the entire chain of two-address nodes as a single live range.

llvm-svn: 122472

show more ...

temporarily disable this: PR8823.

llvm-svn: 122222

Implement expansion in type legalization for add/sub with overflow. The
expansion is the same as that used by LegalizeDAG.

The resulting code sucks in terms of performance/codesize on x86-32 for a

Implement expansion in type legalization for add/sub with overflow. The
expansion is the same as that used by LegalizeDAG.

The resulting code sucks in terms of performance/codesize on x86-32 for a
64-bit operation; I haven't looked into whether different expansions might be
better in general.

llvm-svn: 105378

show more ...