[ARM] Convert some tests to opaque pointers (NFC)

[ARM] Implement PAC return address signing mechanism for PACBTI-M

This patch implements PAC return address signing for armv8-m. This patch roughly
accomplishes the following things:

- PAC and AUT i

[ARM] Implement PAC return address signing mechanism for PACBTI-M

This patch implements PAC return address signing for armv8-m. This patch roughly
accomplishes the following things:

- PAC and AUT instructions are generated.
- They're part of the stack frame setup, so that shrink-wrapping can move them
inwards to cover only part of a function
- The auth code generated by PAC is saved across subroutine calls so that AUT
can find it again to check
- PAC is emitted before stacking registers (so that the SP it signs is the one
on function entry).
- The new pseudo-register ra_auth_code is mentioned in the DWARF frame data
- With CMSE also in use: PAC is emitted before stacking FPCXTNS, and AUT
validates the corresponding value of SP
- Emit correct unwind information when PAC is replaced by PACBTI
- Handle tail calls correctly

Some notes:

We make the assembler accept the `.save {ra_auth_code}` directive that is
emitted by the compiler when it saves a register that contains a
return address authentication code.

For EHABI we need to have the `FrameSetup` flag on the instruction and
handle the `t2PACBTI` opcode (identically to `t2PAC`), so we can emit
`.save {ra_auth_code}`, instead of `.save {r12}`.

For PACBTI-M, the instruction which computes return address PAC should use SP
value before adjustment for the argument registers save are (used for variadic
functions and when a parameter is is split between stack and register), but at
the same it should be after the instruction that saves FPCXT when compiling a
CMSE entry function.

This patch moves the varargs SP adjustment after the FPCXT save (they are never
enabled at the same time), so in a following patch handling of the `PAC`
instruction can be placed between them.

Epilogue emission code adjusted in a similar manner.

PACBTI-M code generation should not emit any instructions for architectures
v6-m, v8-m.base, and for A- and R-class cores. Diagnostic message for such cases
is handled separately by a future ticket.

note on tail calls:

If the called function has four arguments that occupy registers `r0`-`r3`, the
only option for holding the function pointer itself is `r12`, but this register
is used to keep the PAC during function/prologue epilogue and clobbers the
function pointer.

When we do the tail call we need the five registers (`r0`-`r3` and `r12`) to
keep six values - the four function arguments, the function pointer and the PAC,
which is obviously impossible.

One option would be to authenticate the return address before all callee-saved
registers are restored, so we have a scratch register to temporarily keep the
value of `r12`. The issue with this approach is that it violates a fundamental
invariant that PAC is computed using CFA as a modifier. It would also mean using
separate instructions to pop `lr` and the rest of the callee-saved registers,
which would offset the advantages of doing a tail call.

Instead, this patch disables indirect tail calls when the called function take
four or more arguments and the return address sign and authentication is enabled
for the caller function, conservatively assuming the caller function would spill
LR.

This patch is part of a series that adds support for the PACBTI-M extension of
the Armv8.1-M architecture, as detailed here:

https://community.arm.com/arm-community-blogs/b/architectures-and-processors-blog/posts/armv8-1-m-pointer-authentication-and-branch-target-identification-extension

The PACBTI-M specification can be found in the Armv8-M Architecture Reference
Manual:

https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0553/latest

The following people contributed to this patch:

- Momchil Velikov
- Ties Stuij

Reviewed By: danielkiss

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112429

show more ...

[ARM] Add a register class for GPR pairs without SP and use it. NFCI

Summary:
Currently Thumb2InstrInfo.cpp uses a register class which is
auto-generated by tablegen. Such approach is fragile becaus

[ARM] Add a register class for GPR pairs without SP and use it. NFCI

Summary:
Currently Thumb2InstrInfo.cpp uses a register class which is
auto-generated by tablegen. Such approach is fragile because
auto-generated classes might change when other register classes are
added. For example, before https://reviews.llvm.org/D62667
we were using GPRPair_with_gsub_1_in_rGPRRegClass, but had to
change it to GPRPair_with_gsub_1_in_GPRwithAPSRnospRegClass
because the former class stopped being generated (this did not change
the functionality though).

This patch adds a register class consisting of even-odd GPR register
pairs from (R0, R1) to (R10, R11), which excludes (R12, SP) and uses
it in Thumb2InstrInfo.cpp instead of
GPRPair_with_gsub_1_in_GPRwithAPSRnospRegClass.

Reviewers: ostannard, simon_tatham, dmgreen, efriedma

Reviewed By: simon_tatham

Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69026

llvm-svn: 374990

show more ...

RegUsageInfoCollector: Skip AMDGPU entry point functions

I'm not sure if it's worth it or not to add a hook to disable the pass
for an arbitrary function.

This pass is taking up to 5% of compile ti

RegUsageInfoCollector: Skip AMDGPU entry point functions

I'm not sure if it's worth it or not to add a hook to disable the pass
for an arbitrary function.

This pass is taking up to 5% of compile time in tiny programs by
iterating through all of the physical registers in every register
class. This pass should be rewritten in terms of regunits. For now,
skip doing anything for entry point functions. The vast majority of
functions in the real world aren't callable, so just not running this
will give the majority of the benefit.

llvm-svn: 365255

show more ...

[ARM] Add the non-MVE instructions in Arm v8.1-M.

This adds support for the new family of conditional selection /
increment / negation instructions; the low-overhead branch
instructions (e.g. BF, WL

[ARM] Add the non-MVE instructions in Arm v8.1-M.

This adds support for the new family of conditional selection /
increment / negation instructions; the low-overhead branch
instructions (e.g. BF, WLS, DLS); the CLRM instruction to zero a whole
list of registers at once; the new VMRS/VMSR and VLDR/VSTR
instructions to get data in and out of 8.1-M system registers,
particularly including the new VPR register used by MVE vector
predication.

To support this, we also add a register name 'zr' (used by the CSEL
family to force one of the inputs to the constant 0), and operand
types for lists of registers that are also allowed to include APSR or
VPR (used by CLRM). The VLDR/VSTR instructions also need a new
addressing mode.

The low-overhead branch instructions exist in their own separate
architecture extension, which we treat as enabled by default, but you
can say -mattr=-lob or equivalent to turn it off.

Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover

Reviewed By: samparker

Subscribers: miyuki, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62667

llvm-svn: 363039

show more ...

Revert rL362953 and its followup rL362955.

These caused a build failure because I managed not to notice they
depended on a later unpushed commit in my current stack. Sorry about
that.

llvm-svn: 362

Revert rL362953 and its followup rL362955.

These caused a build failure because I managed not to notice they
depended on a later unpushed commit in my current stack. Sorry about
that.

llvm-svn: 362956

show more ...

[ARM] Add the non-MVE instructions in Arm v8.1-M.

This adds support for the new family of conditional selection /
increment / negation instructions; the low-overhead branch
instructions (e.g. BF, WL

[ARM] Add the non-MVE instructions in Arm v8.1-M.

This adds support for the new family of conditional selection /
increment / negation instructions; the low-overhead branch
instructions (e.g. BF, WLS, DLS); the CLRM instruction to zero a whole
list of registers at once; the new VMRS/VMSR and VLDR/VSTR
instructions to get data in and out of 8.1-M system registers,
particularly including the new VPR register used by MVE vector
predication.

To support this, we also add a register name 'zr' (used by the CSEL
family to force one of the inputs to the constant 0), and operand
types for lists of registers that are also allowed to include APSR or
VPR (used by CLRM). The VLDR/VSTR instructions also need some new
addressing modes.

The low-overhead branch instructions exist in their own separate
architecture extension, which we treat as enabled by default, but you
can say -mattr=-lob or equivalent to turn it off.

Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover

Reviewed By: samparker

Subscribers: miyuki, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62667

llvm-svn: 362953

show more ...

[RegUsageInfoCollector] Don't mark as saved registers that don't have subregister lanes

To determine the list of clobbered registers, the RegUsageInfoCollector pass
uses the list of callee saved reg

[RegUsageInfoCollector] Don't mark as saved registers that don't have subregister lanes

To determine the list of clobbered registers, the RegUsageInfoCollector pass
uses the list of callee saved registers provided by the target and then augments
it with the list of registers which have all their subregisters saved. It then
basically does the difference between all the registers and the saved registers
to come up with what is clobbered (plus it checks that the register is defined
within that functions).

The patch fixes a bug where when register does not have any subregister lane,
hence when checking if any of its subregister are not saved, we would find none
and think the register is saved as well.

That's obviously wrong.

The code was actually kind of checking for something like that with the
CoveredBySubRegs bit. What this bit says is that a register is completely
covered by its subregisters.
We required that this bit was set, to check that a register was saved by its
subregister lanes, since without this bit, we potentially would miss to check
some part of the register.

However, this bit is used de facto on registers that don't have any
subregisters (e.g., on ARM) and the code was not prepared for that.

This patch fixes this by checking that a register has subregisters before
declaring it saved when none of its lanes are modified.

llvm-svn: 361901

show more ...