Reapply "[AMDGPU] Still set up the two SGPRs for queue ptr even it is COV5 (#112403)"

This reverts commit ca33649abe5fad93c57afef54e43ed9b3249cd86.

Revert "[AMDGPU] Still set up the two SGPRs for queue ptr even it is COV5 (#112403)"

This reverts commit e215a1e27d84adad2635a52393621eb4fa439dc9 as it broke both
hip and openmp buildbots.

[AMDGPU] Still set up the two SGPRs for queue ptr even it is COV5 (#112403)

Reapply "AMDGPU: Move attributor into optimization pipeline (#83131)" and follow up commit "clang/AMDGPU: Defeat attribute optimization in attribute test" (#98851)

This reverts commit adaff46d087799

Reapply "AMDGPU: Move attributor into optimization pipeline (#83131)" and follow up commit "clang/AMDGPU: Defeat attribute optimization in attribute test" (#98851)

This reverts commit adaff46d087799072438dd744b038e6fd50a2d78.

Drop the -O3 checks from default-attributes.hip. I don't know why they
are different on some bots but reverting this is far too disruptive.

show more ...

Revert "AMDGPU: Move attributor into optimization pipeline (#83131)" and follow up commit "clang/AMDGPU: Defeat attribute optimization in attribute test" (#98851)

This reverts commits 677cc15e0ff2e0

Revert "AMDGPU: Move attributor into optimization pipeline (#83131)" and follow up commit "clang/AMDGPU: Defeat attribute optimization in attribute test" (#98851)

This reverts commits 677cc15e0ff2e0e6aa30538eb187990a6a8f53c0 and
78bc1b64a6dc3fb6191355a5e1b502be8b3668e7.

The test CodeGenHIP/default-attributes.hip is failing on multiple bots
even after the attempted fix including the following:
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/3/builds/1473
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/65/builds/1380
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/161/builds/595
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/154/builds/1372
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/133/builds/1547
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/81/builds/755
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/40/builds/570
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/13/builds/748
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/12/builds/1845
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/11/builds/1695
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/1829
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/193/builds/962
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/23/builds/991
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/144/builds/2256
- https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/46/builds/1614

These bots have been broken for a day, so reverting to get everything
back to green.

show more ...

AMDGPU: Move attributor into optimization pipeline (#83131)

Removing it from the codegen pipeline induces a lot of test churn
because llc is no longer optimizing out implicit arguments to kernels.

AMDGPU: Move attributor into optimization pipeline (#83131)

Removing it from the codegen pipeline induces a lot of test churn
because llc is no longer optimizing out implicit arguments to kernels.

Mostly mechanical, but there are some creative test updates. I preferred
to take the changes as-is in tests where the ABI isn't relevant. In
cases where it's more relevant, or the optimize out logic was too
ingrained in the test, I pre-run the optimization. Some cases manually
add attributes to disable inputs.

show more ...

[AMDGPU] Rename COV module flag to amdhsa_code_object_version (#79905)

The previous name 'amdgpu_code_object_version', was misleading since
this is really a property of the HSA OS. The new spelling

[AMDGPU] Rename COV module flag to amdhsa_code_object_version (#79905)

The previous name 'amdgpu_code_object_version', was misleading since
this is really a property of the HSA OS. The new spelling also matches
the asm directive I added in bc82cfb.

show more ...

[AMDGPU][NFC] Test autogenerated llc tests for COV5 (#74339)

Regenerate a few llc tests to test for COV5 instead of the default ABI
version.

[AMDGPU] Use absolute relocations when compiling for AMDPAL and Mesa3D (#67791)

The primary ISA-independent justification for using PC-relative
addressing is that it makes code position-independent

[AMDGPU] Use absolute relocations when compiling for AMDPAL and Mesa3D (#67791)

The primary ISA-independent justification for using PC-relative
addressing is that it makes code position-independent and therefore
allows sharing of .text pages between processes.

When not sharing .text pages, we can use absolute relocations instead,
which will possibly prevent a bubble introduced by s_getpc_b64.

Co-authored-by: Thomas Symalla <thomas.symalla@amd.com>

show more ...

Revert "[AMDGPU] Make default AMDHSA Code Object Version to be 5 (#65410)" (#66060)

This reverts commit 0a8d17e79b02a92814a2a788d79df1f54d70ec3e.

[AMDGPU] Make default AMDHSA Code Object Version to be 5 (#65410)

Also update LIT tests and docs.
For more details, see
https://llvm.org/docs/AMDGPUUsage.html#code-object-v5-metadata

Reviewed B

[AMDGPU] Make default AMDHSA Code Object Version to be 5 (#65410)

Also update LIT tests and docs.
For more details, see
https://llvm.org/docs/AMDGPUUsage.html#code-object-v5-metadata

Reviewed By: arsenm, jhuber6

Github PR: #65410

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129818

show more ...

[AMDGPU] Introduce SIInstrWorklist to process instructions in moveToVALU

Reviewed By: arsenm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147168

[AMDGPU] Convert some tests to opaque pointers (NFC)

Revert "enable code-object-version=5"

very sorry wrong repo.

This reverts commit d882ba7aeac4b496dccd1b10cb58bd691786b691.

enable code-object-version=5

[AMDGPU] avoid blind converting to VALU REG_SEQUENCE and PHIs

In the 2e29b0138ca243 we introduce a specific solving algorithm
that analyzes the VGPR to SGPR copies use chains and either lowers
the c

[AMDGPU] avoid blind converting to VALU REG_SEQUENCE and PHIs

In the 2e29b0138ca243 we introduce a specific solving algorithm
that analyzes the VGPR to SGPR copies use chains and either lowers
the copy to v_readfirstlane_b32 or converts the whole chain to VALU forms.
Same time we still have the code that blindly converts to VALU REG_SEQUENCE and PHIs
in case they produce SGPR but have VGPRs input operands. In case the REG_SEQUENCE and PHIs
are in the VGPR to SGPR copy use chain, and this chain was considered long enough to convert
copy to v_readfistlane_b32, further lowering them to VALU leads to several kinds of issues.
At first, we have v_readfistlane_b32 which is completely useless because most parts of its use chain
were moved to VALU forms. Second, we may encounter subtle bugs related to the EXEC-dependent CF
because of the weird mixing of SALU and VALU instructions.
This change removes the code that moves REG_SEQUENCE and PHIs to VALU. Instead, we use the fact
that both REG_SEQUENCE and PHIs have copy semantics. That is, if they define SGPR but have VGPR inputs,
we insert VGPR to SGPR copies to make them pure SGPR. Then, the new copies are processed by the common
VGPR to SGPR lowering algorithm.
This is Part 2 in the series of commits aiming at the massive refactoring of the SIFixSGPRCopies pass.

Reviewed By: rampitec

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130367

show more ...

[AMDGPU] Extend SILoadStoreOptimizer to s_load instructions

Apply merging to s_load as is done for s_buffer_load.

Reviewed By: foad

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130742

Revert "[AMDGPU] avoid blind converting to VALU REG_SEQUENCE and PHIs"

This reverts commit 76d9ae924cc361578ecbb5688559f7cebc78ab87.
because it causes several VK CTS tests to fail

[AMDGPU] avoid blind converting to VALU REG_SEQUENCE and PHIs

In the 2e29b0138ca243 we introduce a specific solving algorithm
that analyzes the VGPR to SGPR copies use chains and either lowers
the c

[AMDGPU] avoid blind converting to VALU REG_SEQUENCE and PHIs

In the 2e29b0138ca243 we introduce a specific solving algorithm
that analyzes the VGPR to SGPR copies use chains and either lowers
the copy to v_readfirstlane_b32 or converts the whole chain to VALU forms.
Same time we still have the code that blindly converts to VALU REG_SEQUENCE and PHIs
in case they produce SGPR but have VGPRs input operands. In case the REG_SEQUENCE and PHIs
are in the VGPR to SGPR copy use chain, and this chain was considered long enough to convert
copy to v_readfistlane_b32, further lowering them to VALU leads to several kinds of issues.
At first, we have v_readfistlane_b32 which is completely useless because most parts of its use chain
were moved to VALU forms. Second, we may encounter subtle bugs related to the EXEC-dependent CF
because of the weird mixing of SALU and VALU instructions.
This change removes the code that moves REG_SEQUENCE and PHIs to VALU. Instead, we use the fact
that both REG_SEQUENCE and PHIs have copy semantics. That is, if they define SGPR but have VGPR inputs,
we insert VGPR to SGPR copies to make them pure SGPR. Then, the new copies are processed by the common
VGPR to SGPR lowering algorithm.
This is Part 2 in the series of commits aiming at the massive refactoring of the SIFixSGPRCopies pass.

Reviewed By: rampitec

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130367

show more ...

[AMDGPU] Refine 64 bit misaligned LDS ops selection

Here is the performance data:
```
Using platform: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
Using device: gfx900:xnack-

ds_write_b64

[AMDGPU] Refine 64 bit misaligned LDS ops selection

Here is the performance data:
```
Using platform: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
Using device: gfx900:xnack-

ds_write_b64 aligned by 8: 3.2 sec
ds_write2_b32 aligned by 8: 3.2 sec
ds_write_b16 * 4 aligned by 8: 7.0 sec
ds_write_b8 * 8 aligned by 8: 13.2 sec
ds_write_b64 aligned by 1: 7.3 sec
ds_write2_b32 aligned by 1: 7.5 sec
ds_write_b16 * 4 aligned by 1: 14.0 sec
ds_write_b8 * 8 aligned by 1: 13.2 sec
ds_write_b64 aligned by 2: 7.3 sec
ds_write2_b32 aligned by 2: 7.5 sec
ds_write_b16 * 4 aligned by 2: 7.1 sec
ds_write_b8 * 8 aligned by 2: 13.3 sec
ds_write_b64 aligned by 4: 4.6 sec
ds_write2_b32 aligned by 4: 3.2 sec
ds_write_b16 * 4 aligned by 4: 7.1 sec
ds_write_b8 * 8 aligned by 4: 13.3 sec
ds_read_b64 aligned by 8: 2.3 sec
ds_read2_b32 aligned by 8: 2.2 sec
ds_read_u16 * 4 aligned by 8: 4.8 sec
ds_read_u8 * 8 aligned by 8: 8.6 sec
ds_read_b64 aligned by 1: 4.4 sec
ds_read2_b32 aligned by 1: 7.3 sec
ds_read_u16 * 4 aligned by 1: 14.0 sec
ds_read_u8 * 8 aligned by 1: 8.7 sec
ds_read_b64 aligned by 2: 4.4 sec
ds_read2_b32 aligned by 2: 7.3 sec
ds_read_u16 * 4 aligned by 2: 4.8 sec
ds_read_u8 * 8 aligned by 2: 8.7 sec
ds_read_b64 aligned by 4: 4.4 sec
ds_read2_b32 aligned by 4: 2.3 sec
ds_read_u16 * 4 aligned by 4: 4.8 sec
ds_read_u8 * 8 aligned by 4: 8.7 sec

Using platform: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
Using device: gfx1030

ds_write_b64 aligned by 8: 4.4 sec
ds_write2_b32 aligned by 8: 4.3 sec
ds_write_b16 * 4 aligned by 8: 7.9 sec
ds_write_b8 * 8 aligned by 8: 13.0 sec
ds_write_b64 aligned by 1: 23.2 sec
ds_write2_b32 aligned by 1: 23.1 sec
ds_write_b16 * 4 aligned by 1: 44.0 sec
ds_write_b8 * 8 aligned by 1: 13.0 sec
ds_write_b64 aligned by 2: 23.2 sec
ds_write2_b32 aligned by 2: 23.1 sec
ds_write_b16 * 4 aligned by 2: 7.9 sec
ds_write_b8 * 8 aligned by 2: 13.1 sec
ds_write_b64 aligned by 4: 13.5 sec
ds_write2_b32 aligned by 4: 4.3 sec
ds_write_b16 * 4 aligned by 4: 7.9 sec
ds_write_b8 * 8 aligned by 4: 13.1 sec
ds_read_b64 aligned by 8: 3.5 sec
ds_read2_b32 aligned by 8: 3.4 sec
ds_read_u16 * 4 aligned by 8: 5.3 sec
ds_read_u8 * 8 aligned by 8: 8.5 sec
ds_read_b64 aligned by 1: 13.1 sec
ds_read2_b32 aligned by 1: 22.7 sec
ds_read_u16 * 4 aligned by 1: 43.9 sec
ds_read_u8 * 8 aligned by 1: 7.9 sec
ds_read_b64 aligned by 2: 13.1 sec
ds_read2_b32 aligned by 2: 22.7 sec
ds_read_u16 * 4 aligned by 2: 5.6 sec
ds_read_u8 * 8 aligned by 2: 7.9 sec
ds_read_b64 aligned by 4: 13.1 sec
ds_read2_b32 aligned by 4: 3.4 sec
ds_read_u16 * 4 aligned by 4: 5.6 sec
ds_read_u8 * 8 aligned by 4: 7.9 sec
```

GFX10 exposes a different pattern for sub-DWORD load/store performance
than GFX9. On GFX9 it is faster to issue a single unaligned load or
store than a fully split b8 access, where on GFX10 even a full split
is better. However, this is a theoretical only gain because splitting
an access to a sub-dword level will require more registers and packing/
unpacking logic, so ignoring this option it is better to use a single
64 bit instruction on a misaligned data with the exception of 4 byte
aligned data where ds_read2_b32/ds_write2_b32 is better.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123956

show more ...

[AMDGPU] SILoadStoreOptimizer: avoid unbounded register pressure increases

Previously when combining two loads this pass would sink the
first one down to the second one, putting the combined load
wh

[AMDGPU] SILoadStoreOptimizer: avoid unbounded register pressure increases

Previously when combining two loads this pass would sink the
first one down to the second one, putting the combined load
where the second one was. It would also sink any intervening
instructions which depended on the first load down to just
after the combined load.

For example, if we started with this sequence of
instructions (code flowing from left to right):

X A B C D E F Y

After combining loads X and Y into XY we might end up with:

A B C D E F XY

But if B D and F depended on X, we would get:

A C E XY B D F

Now if the original code had some short disjoint live ranges
from A to B, C to D and E to F, in the transformed code
these live ranges will be long and overlapping. In this way
a single merge of two loads could cause an unbounded
increase in register pressure.

To fix this, change the way the way that loads are moved in
order to merge them so that:
- The second load is moved up to the first one. (But when
merging stores, we still move the first store down to the
second one.)
- Intervening instructions are never moved.
- Instead, if we find an intervening instruction that would
need to be moved, give up on the merge. But this case
should now be pretty rare because normal stores have no
outputs, and normal loads only have address register
inputs, but these will be identical for any pair of loads
that we try to merge.

As well as fixing the unbounded register pressure increase
problem, moving loads up and stores down seems like it
should usually be a win for memory latency reasons.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119006

show more ...

AMDGPU: Stop reserving 36-bytes before kernel arguments for amdpal

This was inheriting the mesa behavior, and as far as I know nobody is
using opencl kernels with amdpal. The isMesaKernel check was

AMDGPU: Stop reserving 36-bytes before kernel arguments for amdpal

This was inheriting the mesa behavior, and as far as I know nobody is
using opencl kernels with amdpal. The isMesaKernel check was
irrelevant because this property needs to be held for all functions.

show more ...

AMDGPU: Enable fixed function ABI by default

Code using indirect calls is broken without this, and there isn't
really much value in supporting the old attempt to vary the argument
placement based on

AMDGPU: Enable fixed function ABI by default

Code using indirect calls is broken without this, and there isn't
really much value in supporting the old attempt to vary the argument
placement based on uses. This resulted in more argument shuffling code
anyway.

Also have the option stop implying all inputs need to be passed. This
will no rely on the amdgpu-no-* attributes to avoid passing
unnecessary values.

show more ...

[AMDGPU] Set most sched model resource's BufferSize to one

Using a BufferSize of one for memory ProcResources will result in better
ILP since it more accurately models the dependencies between memor

[AMDGPU] Set most sched model resource's BufferSize to one

Using a BufferSize of one for memory ProcResources will result in better
ILP since it more accurately models the dependencies between memory ops
and their consumers on an in-order processor. After this change, the
scheduler will treat the data edges from loads as blocking so that
stalls are guaranteed when waiting for data to be retreaved from memory.
Since we don't actually track waitcnt here, this should do a better job
at modeling their behavior.

Practically, this means that the scheduler will trigger the 'STALL'
heuristic more often.

This type of change needs to be evaluated experimentally. Preliminary
results are positive.

Fixes: SWDEV-282962

Reviewed By: rampitec

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114777

show more ...

[AMDGPU] Switch PostRA sched to MachineSched

Use GCNHazardRecognizer in postra sched.
Updated tests for the new schedules.

Reviewed By: arsenm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D1095

[AMDGPU] Switch PostRA sched to MachineSched

Use GCNHazardRecognizer in postra sched.
Updated tests for the new schedules.

Reviewed By: arsenm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109536

Change-Id: Ia86ba2ae168f12fb34b4d8efdab491f84d936cde

show more ...