Overhaul the TargetMachine and LLVMTargetMachine Classes (#111234)

Following discussions in #110443, and the following earlier discussions
in https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/

Overhaul the TargetMachine and LLVMTargetMachine Classes (#111234)

Following discussions in #110443, and the following earlier discussions
in https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/117907.html,
https://reviews.llvm.org/D38482, https://reviews.llvm.org/D38489, this
PR attempts to overhaul the `TargetMachine` and `LLVMTargetMachine`
interface classes. More specifically:
1. Makes `TargetMachine` the only class implemented under
`TargetMachine.h` in the `Target` library.
2. `TargetMachine` contains target-specific interface functions that
relate to IR/CodeGen/MC constructs, whereas before (at least on paper)
it was supposed to have only IR/MC constructs. Any Target that doesn't
want to use the independent code generator simply does not implement
them, and returns either `false` or `nullptr`.
3. Renames `LLVMTargetMachine` to `CodeGenCommonTMImpl`. This renaming
aims to make the purpose of `LLVMTargetMachine` clearer. Its interface
was moved under the CodeGen library, to further emphasis its usage in
Targets that use CodeGen directly.
4. Makes `TargetMachine` the only interface used across LLVM and its
projects. With these changes, `CodeGenCommonTMImpl` is simply a set of
shared function implementations of `TargetMachine`, and CodeGen users
don't need to static cast to `LLVMTargetMachine` every time they need a
CodeGen-specific feature of the `TargetMachine`.
5. More importantly, does not change any requirements regarding library
linking.

cc @arsenm @aeubanks

show more ...

[PowerPC][X86] Make cpu id builtins target independent and lower for PPC (#68919)

Make __builtin_cpu_{init|supports|is} target independent and provide an
opt-in query for targets that want to suppo

[PowerPC][X86] Make cpu id builtins target independent and lower for PPC (#68919)

Make __builtin_cpu_{init|supports|is} target independent and provide an
opt-in query for targets that want to support it. Each target is still
responsible for their specific lowering/code-gen. Also provide code-gen
for PowerPC.

I originally proposed this in https://reviews.llvm.org/D152914 and this
addresses the comments I received there.

---------

Co-authored-by: Nemanja Ivanovic <nemanjaivanovic@nemanjas-air.kpn>
Co-authored-by: Nemanja Ivanovic <nemanja@synopsys.com>

show more ...

[NFC][CodeGen] Change CodeGenOpt::Level/CodeGenFileType into enum classes (#66295)

This will make it easy for callers to see issues with and fix up calls
to createTargetMachine after a future chang

[NFC][CodeGen] Change CodeGenOpt::Level/CodeGenFileType into enum classes (#66295)

This will make it easy for callers to see issues with and fix up calls
to createTargetMachine after a future change to the params of
TargetMachine.

This matches other nearby enums.

For downstream users, this should be a fairly straightforward
replacement,
e.g. s/CodeGenOpt::Aggressive/CodeGenOptLevel::Aggressive
or s/CGFT_/CodeGenFileType::

show more ...

CodeGen: Don't lazily construct MachineFunctionInfo

This fixes what I consider to be an API flaw I've tripped over
multiple times. The point this is constructed isn't well defined, so
depending on w

CodeGen: Don't lazily construct MachineFunctionInfo

This fixes what I consider to be an API flaw I've tripped over
multiple times. The point this is constructed isn't well defined, so
depending on where this is first called, you can conclude different
information based on the MachineFunction. For example, the AMDGPU
implementation inspected the MachineFrameInfo on construction for the
stack objects and if the frame has calls. This kind of worked in
SelectionDAG which visited all allocas up front, but broke in
GlobalISel which hasn't visited any of the IR when arguments are
lowered.

I've run into similar problems before with the MIR parser and trying
to make use of other MachineFunction fields, so I think it's best to
just categorically disallow dependency on the MachineFunction state in
the constructor and to always construct this at the same time as the
MachineFunction itself.

A missing feature I still could use is a way to access an custom
analysis pass on the IR here.

show more ...

CodeGen/CommandFlags: Convert Optional to std::optional

Convert Optional<CodeModel> to std::optional<CodeModel>

mark getTargetTransformInfo and getTargetIRAnalysis as const

Seems like this can be const, since Passes shouldn't modify it.

Reviewed By: wsmoses

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D1

mark getTargetTransformInfo and getTargetIRAnalysis as const

Seems like this can be const, since Passes shouldn't modify it.

Reviewed By: wsmoses

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120518

show more ...

[x86/asm] Make variants work when converting at&t inline asm input to intel asm output

`asm` always has AT&T-style input (`asm inteldialect` has Intel-style asm
input), so EmitGCCInlineAsmStr() alwa

[x86/asm] Make variants work when converting at&t inline asm input to intel asm output

`asm` always has AT&T-style input (`asm inteldialect` has Intel-style asm
input), so EmitGCCInlineAsmStr() always has to pick the same variant since it
cares about the input asm string, not the output asm string.

For PowerPC, that default variant is 1. For other targets, it's 0.

Without this, the included test case errors out with

error: unknown use of instruction mnemonic without a size suffix
mov rax, rbx

since it picks the intel branch and then tries to interpret it as AT&T
when selecting intel-style output with `-x86-asm-syntax=intel`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113894

show more ...

[NFC] [PowerPC] Determine Endianness in PPCTargetMachine

The TargetMachine uses the triple to determine endianness. Just
use that logic rather than replicating it in PPCSubtarget.

Differential revi

[NFC] [PowerPC] Determine Endianness in PPCTargetMachine

The TargetMachine uses the triple to determine endianness. Just
use that logic rather than replicating it in PPCSubtarget.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98674

show more ...

Support addrspacecast initializers with isNoopAddrSpaceCast

Moves isNoopAddrSpaceCast to the TargetMachine. It logically belongs
with the DataLayout.

[PowerPC] Remove the override of isMachineVerifierClean() to open machine verifier
After fix all asserts found by machine verifier in PowerPC target with following patches,
we can activate machine v

[PowerPC] Remove the override of isMachineVerifierClean() to open machine verifier
After fix all asserts found by machine verifier in PowerPC target with following patches,
we can activate machine verifier as default.

rL293769, rL348566, rL349030, rL349029, rL350113, rL350111,
rL350799, rL350165, rL355378, rL352174, rL354762, rL350115

It's also found in PR#27456, https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27456

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59011

llvm-svn: 355798

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

(Re-landing) Expose a TargetMachine::getTargetTransformInfo function

Re-land r321234. It had to be reverted because it broke the shared
library build. The shared library build broke because there

(Re-landing) Expose a TargetMachine::getTargetTransformInfo function

Re-land r321234. It had to be reverted because it broke the shared
library build. The shared library build broke because there was a
missing LLVMBuild dependency from lib/Passes (which calls
TargetMachine::getTargetIRAnalysis) to lib/Target. As far as I can
tell, this problem was always there but was somehow masked
before (perhaps because TargetMachine::getTargetIRAnalysis was a
virtual function).

Original commit message:

This makes the TargetMachine interface a bit simpler. We still need
the std::function in TargetIRAnalysis to avoid having to add a
dependency from Analysis to Target.

See discussion:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-December/119749.html

I avoided adding all of the backend owners to this review since the
change is simple, but let me know if you feel differently about this.

Reviewers: echristo, MatzeB, hfinkel

Reviewed By: hfinkel

Subscribers: jholewinski, jfb, arsenm, dschuff, mcrosier, sdardis, nemanjai, nhaehnle, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, aheejin, kbarton, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41464

llvm-svn: 321375

show more ...

Revert "Expose a TargetMachine::getTargetTransformInfo function"

This reverts commit r321234. It breaks the -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON build.

llvm-svn: 321243

Expose a TargetMachine::getTargetTransformInfo function

Summary:
This makes the TargetMachine interface a bit simpler. We still need
the std::function in TargetIRAnalysis to avoid having to add a
d

Expose a TargetMachine::getTargetTransformInfo function

Summary:
This makes the TargetMachine interface a bit simpler. We still need
the std::function in TargetIRAnalysis to avoid having to add a
dependency from Analysis to Target.

See discussion:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-December/119749.html

I avoided adding all of the backend owners to this review since the
change is simple, but let me know if you feel differently about this.

Reviewers: echristo, MatzeB, hfinkel

Reviewed By: hfinkel

Subscribers: jholewinski, jfb, arsenm, dschuff, mcrosier, sdardis, nemanjai, nhaehnle, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, aheejin, kbarton, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41464

llvm-svn: 321234

show more ...

Revert "TargetMachine: Merge TargetMachine and LLVMTargetMachine"

Reverting to investigate layering effects of MCJIT not linking
libCodeGen but using TargetMachine::getNameWithPrefix() breaking the

Revert "TargetMachine: Merge TargetMachine and LLVMTargetMachine"

Reverting to investigate layering effects of MCJIT not linking
libCodeGen but using TargetMachine::getNameWithPrefix() breaking the
lldb bots.

This reverts commit r315633.

llvm-svn: 315637

show more ...

TargetMachine: Merge TargetMachine and LLVMTargetMachine

Merge LLVMTargetMachine into TargetMachine.

- There is no in-tree target anymore that just implements TargetMachine
but not LLVMTargetMach

TargetMachine: Merge TargetMachine and LLVMTargetMachine

Merge LLVMTargetMachine into TargetMachine.

- There is no in-tree target anymore that just implements TargetMachine
but not LLVMTargetMachine.
- It should still be possible to stub out all the various functions in
case a target does not want to use lib/CodeGen
- This simplifies the code and avoids methods ending up in the wrong
interface.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38489

llvm-svn: 315633

show more ...

Delete Default and JITDefault code models

IMHO it is an antipattern to have a enum value that is Default.

At any given piece of code it is not clear if we have to handle
Default or if has already b

Delete Default and JITDefault code models

IMHO it is an antipattern to have a enum value that is Default.

At any given piece of code it is not clear if we have to handle
Default or if has already been mapped to a concrete value. In this
case in particular, only the target can do the mapping and it is nice
to make sure it is always done.

This deletes the two default enum values of CodeModel and uses an
explicit Optional<CodeModel> when it is possible that it is
unspecified.

llvm-svn: 309911

show more ...

Update the comments on default subtargets based on feedback.

llvm-svn: 309041

Add a set of comments explaining why getSubtargetImpl() is deleted on these targets.

llvm-svn: 307999

Make 0 argument getSubtargetImpl functions for the X86, AArch64, and PPC targets deleted so that no one is tempted to use them.

llvm-svn: 306864

Remove the old and unused PPC32 and PPC64TargetMachine classes.

llvm-svn: 305628

TargetMachine: Indicate whether machine verifier passes.

This adds a callback to the LLVMTargetMachine that lets target indicate
that they do not pass the machine verifier checks in all cases yet.

TargetMachine: Indicate whether machine verifier passes.

This adds a callback to the LLVMTargetMachine that lets target indicate
that they do not pass the machine verifier checks in all cases yet.

This is intended to be a temporary measure while the targets are fixed
allowing us to enable the machine verifier by default with
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS enabled!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33696

llvm-svn: 304320

show more ...

Remove the default subtarget from the Power port. It's unnecessary and harmful if used.

llvm-svn: 299726

Delete Reloc::Default.

Having an enum member named Default is quite confusing: Is it distinct
from the others?

This patch removes that member and instead uses Optional<Reloc> in
places where we hav

Delete Reloc::Default.

Having an enum member named Default is quite confusing: Is it distinct
from the others?

This patch removes that member and instead uses Optional<Reloc> in
places where we have a user input that still hasn't been maped to the
default value, which is now clear has no be one of the remaining 3
options.

llvm-svn: 269988

show more ...