|
Revision tags: llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4 |
|
| #
f71cb9db |
| 14-Nov-2024 |
Kazu Hirata <kazu@google.com> |
[PowerPC] Remove unused includes (NFC) (#116163)
Identified with misc-include-cleaner.
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2 |
|
| #
cc761a7c |
| 13-Mar-2024 |
Zaara Syeda <syzaara@ca.ibm.com> |
[PowerPC][NFC] Rename ADDItocL to match the 64-bit naming convention (#85099)
In preparation of adding a similar instruction for large code model on
AIX for 32-bit, rename the exisitng ADDItocL 64-
[PowerPC][NFC] Rename ADDItocL to match the 64-bit naming convention (#85099)
In preparation of adding a similar instruction for large code model on
AIX for 32-bit, rename the exisitng ADDItocL 64-instruction to ADDItocL8
to match the naming convention of other instructions with 32-bit and
64-bit variants.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init |
|
| #
4b932d84 |
| 07-Dec-2023 |
Chen Zheng <czhengsz@cn.ibm.com> |
[PowerPC] redesign the target flags (#69695)
12 bit is not enough for PPC's target specific flags. If 8 bit for the
bitmask flags, 4 bit for the direct mask, PPC can total have 16 direct
mask and
[PowerPC] redesign the target flags (#69695)
12 bit is not enough for PPC's target specific flags. If 8 bit for the
bitmask flags, 4 bit for the direct mask, PPC can total have 16 direct
mask and 8 bitmask. Not enough for PPC, see this issue in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66316
Redesign how PPC target set the target specific flags. With this patch,
all ppc target flags are direct flags. No bitmask flag in PPC anymore.
This patch aligns with some targets like X86 which also has many target
specific flags.
The patch also fixes a bug related to flag `MO_TLSGDM_FLAG` and `MO_LO`.
They are the same value and the test case changes in this PR shows the
bug.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
2c4ba3e9 |
| 05-Nov-2021 |
Kazu Hirata <kazu@google.com> |
[Target] Use make_early_inc_range (NFC)
|
| #
89b57061 |
| 08-Oct-2021 |
Reid Kleckner <rnk@google.com> |
Move TargetRegistry.(h|cpp) from Support to MC
This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually us
Move TargetRegistry.(h|cpp) from Support to MC
This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually use the target, so we might as well move this out of Support.
This allows us to ensure that Support doesn't have includes from MC/*.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111454
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init, llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3 |
|
| #
a8c624a1 |
| 13-Aug-2019 |
Xiangling Liao <xiangxdh@gmail.com> |
[AIX]Lowering global address for 32/64bit small/large code models
This patch implements global address lowering for 32/64 bit with small/large code models.
1.For 32bit large code model on AI
[AIX]Lowering global address for 32/64bit small/large code models
This patch implements global address lowering for 32/64 bit with small/large code models.
1.For 32bit large code model on AIX, there are newly added pseudo opcode LWZtocL & ADDIStocHA32, the support of which on MC layer will be
provided by future patches.
2.The default code model on AIX should be small code model.
3.Since AIX does not have medium code model, "report_fatal_error" when users specify it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63547
llvm-svn: 368744
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
2446f843 |
| 12-Apr-2019 |
Kang Zhang <shkzhang@cn.ibm.com> |
[PowerPC] Add initialization for some ppc passes
Summary:
Some llc debug options need pass-name as the parameters.
But if we use the pass-name ppc-early-ret, we will get below error:
llc test.ll -s
[PowerPC] Add initialization for some ppc passes
Summary:
Some llc debug options need pass-name as the parameters.
But if we use the pass-name ppc-early-ret, we will get below error:
llc test.ll -stop-after ppc-early-ret
LLVM ERROR: "ppc-early-ret" pass is not registered.
Below pass-names have the pass is not registered error:
ppc-ctr-loops
ppc-ctr-loops-verify
ppc-loop-preinc-prep
ppc-toc-reg-deps
ppc-vsx-copy
ppc-early-ret
ppc-vsx-fma-mutate
ppc-vsx-swaps
ppc-reduce-cr-ops
ppc-qpx-load-splat
ppc-branch-coalescing
ppc-branch-select
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60248
llvm-svn: 358271
show more ...
|
| #
b6926bdc |
| 12-Apr-2019 |
Eric Christopher <echristo@gmail.com> |
Revert "[PowerPC] Add initialization for some ppc passes"
This reverts commit 6f8f98ce8de7c0e4ebd7fa2e1fd9507fe8d1c317 as it
is breaking nearly every bot.
llvm-svn: 358260
|
| #
6f8f98ce |
| 12-Apr-2019 |
Kang Zhang <shkzhang@cn.ibm.com> |
[PowerPC] Add initialization for some ppc passes
Summary:
Some llc debug options need pass-name as the parameters.
But if we use the pass-name ppc-early-ret, we will get below error:
llc test.ll -s
[PowerPC] Add initialization for some ppc passes
Summary:
Some llc debug options need pass-name as the parameters.
But if we use the pass-name ppc-early-ret, we will get below error:
llc test.ll -stop-after ppc-early-ret
LLVM ERROR: "ppc-early-ret" pass is not registered.
Below pass-names have the pass is not registered error:
ppc-ctr-loops
ppc-ctr-loops-verify
ppc-loop-preinc-prep
ppc-toc-reg-deps
ppc-vsx-copy
ppc-early-ret
ppc-vsx-fma-mutate
ppc-vsx-swaps
ppc-reduce-cr-ops
ppc-qpx-load-splat
ppc-branch-coalescing
ppc-branch-select
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60248
llvm-svn: 358256
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1 |
|
| #
2946cd70 |
| 19-Jan-2019 |
Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> |
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-7.0.1, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-7.0.0, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-7.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.1, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.2-rc1, llvmorg-6.0.0, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-6.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.1, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-5.0.0, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-5.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.1, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc3 |
|
| #
6bda14b3 |
| 06-Jun-2017 |
Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com> |
Sort the remaining #include lines in include/... and lib/....
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line
Sort the remaining #include lines in include/... and lib/....
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-4.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-4.0.0, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-4.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.9.1, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.9.0, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.9.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.8.1, llvmorg-3.8.1-rc1 |
|
| #
b550cb17 |
| 18-Apr-2016 |
Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com> |
[NFC] Header cleanup
Removed some unused headers, replaced some headers with forward class declarations.
Found using simple scripts like this one:
clear && ack --cpp -l '#include "llvm/ADT/IndexedM
[NFC] Header cleanup
Removed some unused headers, replaced some headers with forward class declarations.
Found using simple scripts like this one:
clear && ack --cpp -l '#include "llvm/ADT/IndexedMap.h"' | xargs grep -L 'IndexedMap[<]' | xargs grep -n --color=auto 'IndexedMap'
Patch by Eugene Kosov <claprix@yandex.ru>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19219
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266595
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-3.8.0, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc3, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.8.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.7.1, llvmorg-3.7.1-rc2, llvmorg-3.7.1-rc1, llvmorg-3.7.0, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc4, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc3, studio-1.4, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc2, llvmorg-3.7.0-rc1, llvmorg-3.6.2, llvmorg-3.6.2-rc1 |
|
| #
f00654e3 |
| 23-Jun-2015 |
Alexander Kornienko <alexfh@google.com> |
Revert r240137 (Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC)
Apparently, the style needs to be agreed upon first.
llvm-svn: 240390
|
| #
70bc5f13 |
| 19-Jun-2015 |
Alexander Kornienko <alexfh@google.com> |
Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-c
Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
show more ...
|
| #
8340de14 |
| 18-May-2015 |
Hal Finkel <hfinkel@anl.gov> |
[PowerPC] Add extra r2 read deps on @toc@l relocations
If some commits are happy, and some commits are sad, this is a sad commit. It
is sad because it restricts instruction scheduling to work around
[PowerPC] Add extra r2 read deps on @toc@l relocations
If some commits are happy, and some commits are sad, this is a sad commit. It
is sad because it restricts instruction scheduling to work around a binutils
linker bug, and moreover, one that may never be fixed. On 2012-05-21, GCC was
updated not to produce code triggering this bug, and now we'll do the same...
When resolving an address using the ELF ABI TOC pointer, two relocations are
generally required: one for the high part and one for the low part. Only
the high part generally explicitly depends on r2 (the TOC pointer). And, so,
we might produce code like this:
.Ltmp526:
addis 3, 2, .LC12@toc@ha
.Ltmp1628:
std 2, 40(1)
ld 5, 0(27)
ld 2, 8(27)
ld 11, 16(27)
ld 3, .LC12@toc@l(3)
rldicl 4, 4, 0, 32
mtctr 5
bctrl
ld 2, 40(1)
And there is nothing wrong with this code, as such, but there is a linker bug
in binutils (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18414) that will
misoptimize this code sequence to this:
nop
std r2,40(r1)
ld r5,0(r27)
ld r2,8(r27)
ld r11,16(r27)
ld r3,-32472(r2)
clrldi r4,r4,32
mtctr r5
bctrl
ld r2,40(r1)
because the linker does not know (and does not check) that the value in r2
changed in between the instruction using the .LC12@toc@ha (TOC-relative)
relocation and the instruction using the .LC12@toc@l(3) relocation.
Because it finds these instructions using the relocations (and not by
scanning the instructions), it has been asserted that there is no good way
to detect the change of r2 in between. As a result, this bug may never be
fixed (i.e. it may become part of the definition of the ABI). GCC was
updated to add extra dependencies on r2 to instructions using the @toc@l
relocations to avoid this problem, and we'll do the same here.
This is done as a separate pass because:
1. These extra r2 dependencies are not really properties of the
instructions, but rather due to a linker bug, and maybe one day we'll be
able to get rid of them when targeting linkers without this bug (and,
thus, keeping the logic centralized here will make that
straightforward).
2. There are ISel-level peephole optimizations that propagate the @toc@l
relocations to some user instructions, and so the exta dependencies do
not apply only to a fixed set of instructions (without undesirable
definition replication).
The test case was reduced with the help of bugpoint, with minimal cleaning. I'm
looking forward to our upcoming MI serialization support, and with that, much
better tests can be created.
llvm-svn: 237556
show more ...
|