|
Revision tags: llvmorg-21-init |
|
| #
b80965ef |
| 27-Jan-2025 |
Josh Stone <jistone@redhat.com> |
[Support] Report OOM from `allocate_buffer` (#85449)
Previously, it called `::operator new` which may throw `std::bad_alloc`,
regardless of whether LLVM itself was built with exception handling, an
[Support] Report OOM from `allocate_buffer` (#85449)
Previously, it called `::operator new` which may throw `std::bad_alloc`,
regardless of whether LLVM itself was built with exception handling, and
this can cause safety issues if outside code has destructors that will
call back into LLVM. Now we use `::operator new(..., nothrow)` and call
`llvm::report_bad_alloc_error` when allocation fails, which will abort
when LLVM is built without exceptions.
Ref: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/85281
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init |
|
| #
ce5b04cc |
| 25-Jan-2022 |
Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra@googlemail.com> |
[Support] #include <new> for std::align_val_t
This is only used when aligned new is enabled.
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
bc1ea2a2 |
| 25-Apr-2020 |
Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra@googlemail.com> |
Replicate attributes on definition to make MSVC less noisy
warning C4565: 'llvm::allocate_buffer': redefinition; the symbol was previously declared with __declspec(restrict)
|
| #
7aaff8fd |
| 24-Apr-2020 |
Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra@googlemail.com> |
[ADT] Move allocate_buffer to MemAlloc.h and out of line
There's an ABI breakage here if LLVM is compiled in C++14 without
aligned allocation and a user tries to use the result with aligned
allocati
[ADT] Move allocate_buffer to MemAlloc.h and out of line
There's an ABI breakage here if LLVM is compiled in C++14 without
aligned allocation and a user tries to use the result with aligned
allocation. If DenseMap or unique_function is used across that ABI
boundary it will break (PR45413). Moving it out of line is a bit of
a band-aid and LLVM doesn't really give ABI guarantees at this level,
but given the number of complaints I've received over this it still
seems worth fixing.
show more ...
|