|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2 |
| #
2a6dbedf |
| 23-Feb-2022 |
Jonas Devlieghere <jonas@devlieghere.com> |
[lldb] Fix (unintentional) recursion in CommandObjectRegexCommand
Jim noticed that the regex command is unintentionally recursive. Let's
use the following command regex as an example:
(lldb) com
[lldb] Fix (unintentional) recursion in CommandObjectRegexCommand
Jim noticed that the regex command is unintentionally recursive. Let's
use the following command regex as an example:
(lldb) com regex humm 's/([^ ]+) ([^ ]+)/p %1 %2 %1 %2/'
If we call it with arguments foo bar, thing behave as expected:
(lldb) humm foo bar
(...)
foo bar foo bar
However, if we include %2 in the arguments, things break down:
(lldb) humm fo%2o bar
(...)
fobaro bar fobaro bar
The problem is that the implementation of the substitution is too naive.
It substitutes the %1 token into the target template in place, then does
the %2 substitution starting with the resultant string. So if the
previous substitution introduced a %2 token, it would get processed in
the second sweep, etc.
This patch addresses the issue by walking the command once and
substituting the % variables in place.
(lldb) humm fo%2o bar
(...)
fo%2o bar fo%2o bar
Furthermore, this patch also reports an error if not enough variables
were provided and add support for substituting %0.
rdar://81236994
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120101
show more ...
|