|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5 |
|
| #
2238dcc3 |
| 25-May-2023 |
Jonas Devlieghere <jonas@devlieghere.com> |
[NFC][Py Reformat] Reformat python files in lldb
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problem
[NFC][Py Reformat] Reformat python files in lldb
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3 |
|
| #
52882de0 |
| 01-May-2023 |
Michael Buch <michaelbuch12@gmail.com> |
[lldb][test] TestCPP20Standard.py: make it a libc++ test
We just want to test whether the language switch works.
This is easier to control for libc++, since for bots building
the tests against libst
[lldb][test] TestCPP20Standard.py: make it a libc++ test
We just want to test whether the language switch works.
This is easier to control for libc++, since for bots building
the tests against libstdc++ we might not have the necessary
`<compare>` header available currently.
show more ...
|
| #
53791896 |
| 24-Apr-2023 |
Michael Buch <michaelbuch12@gmail.com> |
[lldb][test] TestCPP20Standard.py: skip on older compilers
Requires C++20 support (at least for the spaceship operator).
Seems to work back to Clang-11
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-16.0.2 |
|
| #
89cd0e8c |
| 14-Apr-2023 |
Michael Buch <michaelbuch12@gmail.com> |
[lldb] Allow evaluating expressions in C++20 mode
This patch allows users to evaluate expressions using
`expr -l c++20`. Currently DWARF keeps the CU's at
`DW_AT_language` at `DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14
[lldb] Allow evaluating expressions in C++20 mode
This patch allows users to evaluate expressions using
`expr -l c++20`. Currently DWARF keeps the CU's at
`DW_AT_language` at `DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14` even
when compiling with `-std=c++20`. So even in "C++20
programs" expression evaluation will by default be
performed in `C++11` mode for now.
Enabling `C++14` has been previously attempted at
https://reviews.llvm.org/D80308
There are some remaining issues around evaluating C++20
expressions. Mainly, lack of support for C++20 AST nodes in
`clang::ASTImporter`. But these can be addressed in follow-up
patches.
show more ...
|