[lldb] Use std::optional instead of llvm::Optional (NFC)

This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<. I'll post
a separate patch to clean up the "using" declarations, #include
"llvm/

[lldb] Use std::optional instead of llvm::Optional (NFC)

This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<. I'll post
a separate patch to clean up the "using" declarations, #include
"llvm/ADT/Optional.h", etc.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

show more ...

[lldb] Add #include <optional> (NFC)

This patch adds #include <optional> to those files containing
llvm::Optional<...> or Optional<...>.

I'll post a separate patch to actually replace llvm::Optiona

[lldb] Add #include <optional> (NFC)

This patch adds #include <optional> to those files containing
llvm::Optional<...> or Optional<...>.

I'll post a separate patch to actually replace llvm::Optional with
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

show more ...

[lldb] Use std::nullopt instead of None (NFC)

This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of ma

[lldb] Use std::nullopt instead of None (NFC)

This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

show more ...

[nfc] [lldb] Prevent needless copies of DataExtractor

lldb_private::DataExtractor contains DataBufferSP m_data_sp which is
relatively expensive to copy (due to multi-threading locking).

llvm::DataE

[nfc] [lldb] Prevent needless copies of DataExtractor

lldb_private::DataExtractor contains DataBufferSP m_data_sp which is
relatively expensive to copy (due to multi-threading locking).

llvm::DataExtractor does not have this problem as it uses StringRef
instead.

The copy constructor is explicit as otherwise it is easy to make
unintended modification of a local copy instead of a caller's instance
(D107470 but that is llvm::DataExtractor).

Reviewed By: clayborg

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107485

show more ...

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp ----------------------------------------

[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).

This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).

Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

elf-core: Convert remaining register context to use register set maps

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39681, we started using a map instead
passing a long list of register sets to the ppc64le register

elf-core: Convert remaining register context to use register set maps

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39681, we started using a map instead
passing a long list of register sets to the ppc64le register context.
However, existing register contexts were still using the old method.

This converts the remaining register contexts to use this approach.
While doing that, I've had to modify the approach a bit:
- the general purpose register set is still kept as a separate field,
because this one is always present, and it's parsing is somewhat
different than that of other register sets.
- since the same register sets have different IDs on different operating
systems, but we use the same register context class to represent
different register sets, I've needed to add a layer of indirection to
translate os-specific constants (e.g. NETBSD::NT_AMD64_FPREGS) into more
generic terms (e.g. floating point register set).

While slightly more complicated, this setup allows for better separation
of concerns. The parsing code in ProcessElfCore can focus on parsing
OS-specific core file notes, and can completely ignore
architecture-specific register sets (by just storing any unrecognised
notes in a map). These notes will then be passed on to the
architecture-specific register context, which can just deal with
architecture specifics, because the OS-specific note types are hidden in
a register set description map.

This way, adding an register set, which is already supported on other
OSes, to a new OS, should in most cases be as simple as adding a new
entry into the register set description map.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40133

llvm-svn: 319162

show more ...