[lldb] Remove remaining uses of llvm::Optional (NFC)

This patch removes the unused "using" declarations, updates comments,
and removes #include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h".

This is part of an effort to m

[lldb] Remove remaining uses of llvm::Optional (NFC)

This patch removes the unused "using" declarations, updates comments,
and removes #include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h".

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

show more ...

[lldb] Use std::optional instead of llvm::Optional (NFC)

This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<. I'll post
a separate patch to clean up the "using" declarations, #include
"llvm/

[lldb] Use std::optional instead of llvm::Optional (NFC)

This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<. I'll post
a separate patch to clean up the "using" declarations, #include
"llvm/ADT/Optional.h", etc.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

show more ...

[lldb] Add #include <optional> (NFC)

This patch adds #include <optional> to those files containing
llvm::Optional<...> or Optional<...>.

I'll post a separate patch to actually replace llvm::Optiona

[lldb] Add #include <optional> (NFC)

This patch adds #include <optional> to those files containing
llvm::Optional<...> or Optional<...>.

I'll post a separate patch to actually replace llvm::Optional with
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

show more ...

[lldb][CPlusPlus] Introduce CPlusPlusLanguage::MethodName::GetReturnType

This patch adds a way to extract the return type out
of the `CPlusPlusNameParser`. This will be useful
for cases where we wan

[lldb][CPlusPlus] Introduce CPlusPlusLanguage::MethodName::GetReturnType

This patch adds a way to extract the return type out
of the `CPlusPlusNameParser`. This will be useful
for cases where we want a function's basename *and* the
return type but not the function arguments; this is
currently not possible (the parser either gives us the
full name or just the basename). Since the parser knows
how to handle return types already we should just expose
this to users that need it.

**Testing**

* Added unit-tests

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136935

show more ...

[lldb][CPlusPlus] Add abi_tag support to the CPlusPlusNameParser

This patch teaches the `CPlusPlusNameParser` to parse the
demangled/prettified [[gnu::abi_tag(...)]] attribute. The demangled format

[lldb][CPlusPlus] Add abi_tag support to the CPlusPlusNameParser

This patch teaches the `CPlusPlusNameParser` to parse the
demangled/prettified [[gnu::abi_tag(...)]] attribute. The demangled format
isn't standardized and the additions to the parser were mainly driven
using Clang (and the limited information on this from the official
Clang docs).

This change is motivated by multiple failures around step-in
behaviour for libcxx APIs (many of which have ABI tags as of recently).
LLDB determines whether the `step-avoid-regexp` matches the current
frame by parsing the scope-qualified name out of the demangled
function symbol. On failure, the `CPlusPlusNameParser` will simply
return the fully demangled name (which can include the return type)
to the caller, which in `FrameMatchesAvoidCriteria` means we will
not correctly decide whether we should stop at a frame or not if
the function has an abi_tag.

Ideally we wouldn't want to rely on the non-standard format
of demangled attributes. Alternatives would be:

1. Use the mangle tree API to do the parsing for us
2. Reconstruct the scope-qualified name from DWARF instead of parsing
the demangled name

(1) isn't feasible without a significant refactor of `lldb_private::Mangled`,
if we want to do this efficiently.

(2) could be feasible in cases where debug-info for a frame is
available. But it does mean we certain operations (such as step-in regexp,
and frame function names) won't work with/won't show ABI tags.

**Testing**

* Un-XFAILed step-in API test
* Added parser unit-tests

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136306

show more ...

[lldb] Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default;

Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default;

$ run-clang-tidy.py -header-filter='lldb' -checks='-*,mo

[lldb] Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default;

Replace default bodies of special member functions with = default;

$ run-clang-tidy.py -header-filter='lldb' -checks='-*,modernize-use-equals-default' -fix ,

https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-equals-default.html

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104041

show more ...

[lldb] Update header guards to be consistent and compliant with LLVM (NFC)

LLDB has a few different styles of header guards and they're not very
consistent because things get moved around or copy/pa

[lldb] Update header guards to be consistent and compliant with LLVM (NFC)

LLDB has a few different styles of header guards and they're not very
consistent because things get moved around or copy/pasted. This patch
unifies the header guards across LLDB and converts everything to match
LLVM's style.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74743

show more ...

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the ne

Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

show more ...

Remove header grouping comments.

This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdate

Remove header grouping comments.

This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.

llvm-svn: 346626

show more ...

Enable parsing C++ names generated by lambda functions.

https://reviews.llvm.org/D34911 from Weng Xuetian.

llvm-svn: 307944

New C++ function name parsing logic (Resubmit)

Current implementation of CPlusPlusLanguage::MethodName::Parse() doesn't
get anywhere close to covering full extent of possible function declarations.

New C++ function name parsing logic (Resubmit)

Current implementation of CPlusPlusLanguage::MethodName::Parse() doesn't
get anywhere close to covering full extent of possible function declarations.
It causes incorrect behavior in avoid-stepping and sometimes messes
printing of thread backtrace.

This change implements more methodical parsing logic based on clang
lexer and simple recursive parser.

Examples:
void std::vector<Class, std::allocator<Class>>::_M_emplace_back_aux<Class const&>(Class const&)
void (*&std::_Any_data::_M_access<void (*)()>())()

Previous version of this change (D31451) was rolled back due to an issue
with Objective-C selectors being incorrectly recognized as a C++ identifier.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31451

llvm-svn: 299721

show more ...

New C++ function name parsing logic

Current implementation of CPlusPlusLanguage::MethodName::Parse() doesn't
get anywhere close to covering full extent of possible function declarations.
It causes i

New C++ function name parsing logic

Current implementation of CPlusPlusLanguage::MethodName::Parse() doesn't
get anywhere close to covering full extent of possible function declarations.
It causes incorrect behavior in avoid-stepping and sometimes messes
printing of thread backtrace.

This change implements more methodical parsing logic based on clang
lexer and simple recursive parser.

Examples:
void std::vector<Class, std::allocator<Class>>::_M_emplace_back_aux<Class const&>(Class const&)
void (*&std::_Any_data::_M_access<void (*)()>())()

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31451

llvm-svn: 299374

show more ...