[LLDB] Retry Add a target.launch-working-dir setting

This retries the PR 113521 skipping a test in a remote environment.

Revert "[LLDB] Add a target.launch-working-dir setting" (#114973)

Reverts llvm/llvm-project#113521 due to build bot failures mentioned in
the original PR.

[LLDB] Add a target.launch-working-dir setting (#113521)

Internally we use bazel in a way in which it can drop you in a LLDB
session with the target launched in a particular cwd, which is needed
f

[LLDB] Add a target.launch-working-dir setting (#113521)

Internally we use bazel in a way in which it can drop you in a LLDB
session with the target launched in a particular cwd, which is needed
for things to work. We've been making this automation work via `process
launch -w`. However, if later the user wants to restart the process with
`r`, then they end up using a different cwd for relaunching the process.
As a way to fix this, I'm adding a target-level setting that allows
configuring a default cwd used for launching the process without needing
the user to specify it manually.

show more ...

[lldb] Fix typos in various help messages. (#109851)

[LLDB] Reapply SBSaveCore Add Memory List (#107937)

Recently in #107731 this change was revereted due to excess memory size
in `TestSkinnyCore`. This was due to a bug where a range's end was being

[LLDB] Reapply SBSaveCore Add Memory List (#107937)

Recently in #107731 this change was revereted due to excess memory size
in `TestSkinnyCore`. This was due to a bug where a range's end was being
passed as size. Creating massive memory ranges.

Additionally, and requiring additional review, I added more unit tests
and more verbose logic to the merging of save core memory regions.

@jasonmolenda as an FYI.

show more ...

Revert "[LLDB] Reappply SBSaveCore AddMemoryList" (#107731)

Reverts llvm/llvm-project#107159 as this is still causing
`TestSkinnyCorefile.py` to time out.


https://ci.swift.org/view/all/job/llv

Revert "[LLDB] Reappply SBSaveCore AddMemoryList" (#107731)

Reverts llvm/llvm-project#107159 as this is still causing
`TestSkinnyCorefile.py` to time out.


https://ci.swift.org/view/all/job/llvm.org/view/LLDB/job/as-lldb-cmake/11099/

https://ci.swift.org/view/all/job/llvm.org/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/5544/

show more ...

[LLDB] Reappply SBSaveCore AddMemoryList (#107159)

Reapplies #106293, testing identified issue in the merging code. I used
this opportunity to strip CoreFileMemoryRanges to it's own file and then

[LLDB] Reappply SBSaveCore AddMemoryList (#107159)

Reapplies #106293, testing identified issue in the merging code. I used
this opportunity to strip CoreFileMemoryRanges to it's own file and then
add unit tests on it's behavior.

show more ...

Revert "[LLDB][SBSaveCore] Add selectable memory regions to SBSaveCor… (#106293)

Reverts #105442. Due to `TestSkinnyCoreFailing` and root causing of the
failure will likely take longer than EOD.

[lldb] Turn lldb_private::Status into a value type. (#106163)

This patch removes all of the Set.* methods from Status.

This cleanup is part of a series of patches that make it harder use the
ant

[lldb] Turn lldb_private::Status into a value type. (#106163)

This patch removes all of the Set.* methods from Status.

This cleanup is part of a series of patches that make it harder use the
anti-pattern of keeping a long-lives Status object around and updating
it while dropping any errors it contains on the floor.

This patch is largely NFC, the more interesting next steps this enables
is to:
1. remove Status.Clear()
2. assert that Status::operator=() never overwrites an error
3. remove Status::operator=()

Note that step (2) will bring 90% of the benefits for users, and step
(3) will dramatically clean up the error handling code in various
places. In the end my goal is to convert all APIs that are of the form

` ResultTy DoFoo(Status& error)
`
to

` llvm::Expected<ResultTy> DoFoo()
`
How to read this patch?

The interesting changes are in Status.h and Status.cpp, all other
changes are mostly

` perl -pi -e 's/\.SetErrorString/ = Status::FromErrorString/g' $(git
grep -l SetErrorString lldb/source)
`
plus the occasional manual cleanup.

show more ...

[LLDB][SBSaveCore] Add selectable memory regions to SBSaveCore (#105442)

This patch adds the option to specify specific memory ranges to be
included in a given core file. The current implementation

[LLDB][SBSaveCore] Add selectable memory regions to SBSaveCore (#105442)

This patch adds the option to specify specific memory ranges to be
included in a given core file. The current implementation lets user
specified ranges either be in addition to a certain save style, or
independent of them via the newly added custom enum.

To achieve being inclusive of save style, I've moved from a std::vector
of ranges to a RangeDataVector, and to join overlapping ranges to
prevent duplication of memory ranges in the core file.

As a non function bonus, when SBSavecore was initially created, the
header was included in the lldb-private interfaces, and I've fixed that
and moved it the forward declare as an oversight. CC @bulbazord in case
we need to include that into swift.

show more ...

[lldb] Eliminate more Targer* in favor of Target& in CommandObjects (NFC)

The majority of the replaced Target pointers were already used
unconditionally and the few that were shouldn't even be NULL.

[lldb] Unify the way we get the Target in CommandObject (#101208)

Currently, CommandObjects are obtaining a target in a variety of ways.
Often the command incorrectly operates on the selected targe

[lldb] Unify the way we get the Target in CommandObject (#101208)

Currently, CommandObjects are obtaining a target in a variety of ways.
Often the command incorrectly operates on the selected target. As an
example, when a breakpoint command is running, the current target is
passed into the command but the target that hit the breakpoint is not
the selected target. In other places we use the CommandObject's
execution context, which is frozen during the execution of the command,
and comes with its own limitations. Finally, we often want to fall back
to the dummy target if no real target is available.

Instead of having to guess how to get the target, this patch introduces
one helper function in CommandObject to get the most relevant target. In
order of priority, that's the target from the command object's execution
context, from the interpreter's execution context, the selected target
or the dummy target.

rdar://110846511

show more ...

[lldb] Don't crash when attaching to pid and no binaries found (#100287)

There is a narrow window during process launch on macOS where lldb can
attach and no binaries will be seen as loaded in the

[lldb] Don't crash when attaching to pid and no binaries found (#100287)

There is a narrow window during process launch on macOS where lldb can
attach and no binaries will be seen as loaded in the process (none
reported by libdyld SPI). A year ago I made changes to set the
new-binary-loaded breakpoint correctly despite this. But we've seen a
crash when this combination is seen, where
CommandObjectProcessAttach::DoExecute assumed there was at least one
binary registered in the Target. Fix that.

Also fix two FileSpec API uses from when we didn't have a GetPath()
method that returned a std::string, and was copying the filepaths into
fixed length buffers. All of this code was from ~14 years ago when we
didn't have that API.

rdar://131631627

show more ...

[LLDB][SaveCore] Add SBSaveCoreOptions Object, and SBProcess::SaveCore() overload (#98403)

This PR adds `SBSaveCoreOptions`, which is a container class for options
when LLDB is taking coredumps. Fo

[LLDB][SaveCore] Add SBSaveCoreOptions Object, and SBProcess::SaveCore() overload (#98403)

This PR adds `SBSaveCoreOptions`, which is a container class for options
when LLDB is taking coredumps. For this first iteration this container
just keeps parity with the extant API of `file, style, plugin`. In the
future this options object can be extended to allow users to take a
subset of their core dumps.

show more ...

[LLDB] Make 'process load' take remote os path delimiter into account (#98690)

Currently, if we execute 'process load' with remote debugging, it uses
the host's path delimiter to look up files on a

[LLDB] Make 'process load' take remote os path delimiter into account (#98690)

Currently, if we execute 'process load' with remote debugging, it uses
the host's path delimiter to look up files on a target machine. If we
run remote debugging of Linux target on Windows and execute "process
load C:\foo\a.so", lldb-server tries to load \foo\a.so instead of
/foo/a.so on the remote.

It affects several API tests.

This commit fixes that error. Also, it contains minor fixes for
TestLoadUnload.py for testing on Windows host and Linux target.

show more ...

[lldb] Address mask sbprocess apis and new mask invalid const (#83663)

[lldb] Add SBProcess methods for get/set/use address masks (#83095)

I'm reviving a patch from phabracator, https://reviews.l

[lldb] Address mask sbprocess apis and new mask invalid const (#83663)

[lldb] Add SBProcess methods for get/set/use address masks (#83095)

I'm reviving a patch from phabracator, https://reviews.llvm.org/D155905
which was approved but I wasn't thrilled with all the API I was adding
to SBProcess for all of the address mask types / memory regions. In this
update, I added enums to control type address mask type (code, data,
any) and address space specifiers (low, high, all) with defaulted
arguments for the most common case. I originally landed this via
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83095 but it failed on CIs
outside of arm64 Darwin so I had to debug it on more environments
and update the patch.

This patch is also fixing a bug in the "addressable bits to address
mask" calculation I added in AddressableBits::SetProcessMasks. If lldb
were told that 64 bits are valid for addressing, this method would
overflow the calculation and set an invalid mask. Added tests to check
this specific bug while I was adding these APIs.

This patch changes the value of "no mask set" from 0 to
LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS_MASK, which is UINT64_MAX. A mask of all 1's
means "no bits are used for addressing" which is an impossible mask,
whereas a mask of 0 means "all bits are used for addressing" which
is possible.

I added a base class implementation of ABI::FixCodeAddress and
ABI::FixDataAddress that will apply the Process mask values if they
are set to a value other than LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS_MASK.

I updated all the callers/users of the Mask methods which were
handling a value of 0 to mean invalid mask to use
LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS_MASK.

I added code to the all AArch64 ABI Fix* methods to apply the
Highmem masks if they have been set. These will not be set on a
Linux environment, but in TestAddressMasks.py I test the highmem
masks feature for any AArch64 target, so all AArch64 ABI plugins
must handle it.

rdar://123530562

show more ...

Start to clean up the process of defining command arguments. (#83097)

Partly, there's just a lot of unnecessary boiler plate. It's also
possible to define combinations of arguments that make no sen

Start to clean up the process of defining command arguments. (#83097)

Partly, there's just a lot of unnecessary boiler plate. It's also
possible to define combinations of arguments that make no sense (e.g.
eArgRepeatPlus followed by eArgRepeatPlain...) but these are never
checked since we just push_back directly into the argument definitions.

This commit is step 1 of this cleanup - do the obvious stuff. In it, all
the simple homogenous argument lists and the breakpoint/watchpoint
ID/Range types, are set with common functions. This is an NFC change, it
just centralizes boiler plate. There's no checking yet because you can't
get a single argument wrong.

The end goal is that all argument definition goes through functions and
m_arguments is hidden so that you can't define inconsistent argument
sets.

show more ...

Add the RegisterCompleter to eArgTypeRegisterName in g_argument_table (#82428)

This is a follow-on to:

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82085

The completer for register names was miss

Add the RegisterCompleter to eArgTypeRegisterName in g_argument_table (#82428)

This is a follow-on to:

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82085

The completer for register names was missing from the argument table. I
somehow missed that the only register completer test was x86_64, so that
test broke.

I added the completer in to the right slot in the argument table, and
added a small completions test that just uses the alias register names.
If we end up having a platform that doesn't define register names, we'll
have to skip this test there, but it should add a sniff test for
register completion that will run most everywhere.

show more ...

Revert "Centralize the handling of completion for simple argument lists. (#82085)"

This reverts commit 21631494b068d9364b8dc8f18e59adee9131a0a5.

Reverted because of greendragon failure:

**********

Revert "Centralize the handling of completion for simple argument lists. (#82085)"

This reverts commit 21631494b068d9364b8dc8f18e59adee9131a0a5.

Reverted because of greendragon failure:

******************** TEST 'lldb-api :: functionalities/completion/TestCompletion.py' FAILED ********************
Script:

show more ...

Centralize the handling of completion for simple argument lists. (#82085)

Most commands were adding argument completion handling by themselves,
resulting in a lot of unnecessary boilerplate. In man

Centralize the handling of completion for simple argument lists. (#82085)

Most commands were adding argument completion handling by themselves,
resulting in a lot of unnecessary boilerplate. In many cases, this could
be done generically given the argument definition and the entries in the
g_argument_table.

I'm going to address this in a couple passes. In this first pass, I
added handling of commands that have only one argument list, with one
argument type, either single or repeated, and changed all the commands
that are of this sort (and don't have other bits of business in their
completers.)

I also added some missing connections between arg types and completions
to the table, and added a RemoteFilename and RemotePath to use in places
where we were using the Remote completers. Those arguments used to say
they were "files" but they were in fact remote files.

I also added a module arg type to use where we were using the module
completer. In that case, we should call the argument module.

show more ...

[lldb][NFCI] Remove CommandObjectProcessHandle::VerifyCommandOptionValue (#79901)

I was refactoring something else but ran into this function. It was
somewhat confusing to read through and understa

[lldb][NFCI] Remove CommandObjectProcessHandle::VerifyCommandOptionValue (#79901)

I was refactoring something else but ran into this function. It was
somewhat confusing to read through and understand, but it boils down to
two steps:
- First we try `OptionArgParser::ToBoolean`. If that works, then we're
good to go.
- Second, we try `llvm::to_integer` to see if it's an integer. If it
parses to 0 or 1, we're good.
- Failing either of the steps above means we cannot parse it into a
bool.

Instead of having an integer out param and a bool return value, the
interface is better served with an optional<bool> -- Either it parses
into true or false, or you get back nothing (nullopt).

show more ...

[lldb][NFCI] Change BreakpointIDList::FindBreakpointID to BreakpointIDList::Contains (#79517)

`FindBreakpointID` take a BreakpointID and a pointer to a size_t (so you
can get position information).

[lldb][NFCI] Change BreakpointIDList::FindBreakpointID to BreakpointIDList::Contains (#79517)

`FindBreakpointID` take a BreakpointID and a pointer to a size_t (so you
can get position information). It returns a bool to indicate whether the
id was found in the list or not.

There are 2 callers of this currently and neither one actually uses the
position information, so I removed it. After that, I renamed it to
Contains to more accurately reflect the intent. Additionally, I changed
the argument type from a reference to a value (because BreakpointID is
just a wrapper around 2 integers, copies are cheap).

show more ...

[lldb] [mostly NFC] Large WP foundation: WatchpointResources (#68845)

This patch is rearranging code a bit to add WatchpointResources to
Process. A WatchpointResource is meant to represent a hardwar

[lldb] [mostly NFC] Large WP foundation: WatchpointResources (#68845)

This patch is rearranging code a bit to add WatchpointResources to
Process. A WatchpointResource is meant to represent a hardware
watchpoint register in the inferior process. It has an address, a size,
a type, and a list of Watchpoints that are using this
WatchpointResource.

This current patch doesn't add any of the features of
WatchpointResources that make them interesting -- a user asking to watch
a 24 byte object could watch this with three 8 byte WatchpointResources.
Or a Watchpoint on 1 byte at 0x1002 and a second watchpoint on 1 byte at
0x1003, these must both be served by a single WatchpointResource on that
doubleword at 0x1000 on a 64-bit target, if two hardware watchpoint
registers were used to track these separately, one of them may not be
hit. Or if you have one Watchpoint on a variable with a condition set,
and another Watchpoint on that same variable with a command defined or
different condition, or ignorecount, both of those Watchpoints need to
evaluate their criteria/commands when their WatchpointResource has been
hit.

There's a bit of code movement to rearrange things in the direction I'll
need for implementing this feature, so I want to start with reviewing &
landing this mostly NFC patch and we can focus on the algorithmic
choices about how WatchpointResources are shared and handled as they're
triggeed, separately.

This patch also stops printing "Watchpoint <n> hit: old value: <x>, new
vlaue: <y>" for Read watchpoints. I could make an argument for print
"Watchpoint <n> hit: current value <x>" but the current output doesn't
make any sense, and the user can print the value if they are
particularly interested. Read watchpoints are used primarily to
understand what code is reading a variable.

This patch adds more fallbacks for how to print the objects being
watched if we have types, instead of assuming they are all integral
values, so a struct will print its elements. As large watchpoints are
added, we'll be doing a lot more of those.

To track the WatchpointSP in the WatchpointResources, I changed the
internal API which took a WatchpointSP and devolved it to a Watchpoint*,
which meant touching several different Process files. I removed the
watchpoint code in ProcessKDP which only reported that watchpoints
aren't supported, the base class does that already.

I haven't yet changed how we receive a watchpoint to identify the
WatchpointResource responsible for the trigger, and identify all
Watchpoints that are using this Resource to evaluate their conditions
etc. This is the same work that a BreakpointSite needs to do when it has
been tiggered, where multiple Breakpoints may be at the same address.

There is not yet any printing of the Resources that a Watchpoint is
implemented in terms of ("watchpoint list", or
SBWatchpoint::GetDescription).

"watchpoint set var" and "watchpoint set expression" take a size
argument which was previously 1, 2, 4, or 8 (an enum). I've changed this
to an unsigned int. Most hardware implementations can only watch 1, 2,
4, 8 byte ranges, but with Resources we'll allow a user to ask for
different sized watchpoints and set them in hardware-expressble terms
soon.

I've annotated areas where I know there is work still needed with
LWP_TODO that I'll be working on once this is landed.

I've tested this on aarch64 macOS, aarch64 Linux, and Intel macOS.

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/72116
(cherry picked from commit fc6b72523f3d73b921690a713e97a433c96066c6)

show more ...

Revert "[lldb] [mostly NFC] Large WP foundation: WatchpointResources (#68845)"

...and follow ups.

As it has caused test failures on Linux Arm and AArch64:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/9

Revert "[lldb] [mostly NFC] Large WP foundation: WatchpointResources (#68845)"

...and follow ups.

As it has caused test failures on Linux Arm and AArch64:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/96/builds/49126
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/17/builds/45824

```
lldb-shell :: Subprocess/clone-follow-child-wp.test
lldb-shell :: Subprocess/fork-follow-child-wp.test
lldb-shell :: Subprocess/vfork-follow-child-wp.test
```

This reverts commit a6c62bf1a4717accc852463b664cd1012237d334,
commit a0a1ff3ab40e347589b4e27d8fd350c600526735 and commit
fc6b72523f3d73b921690a713e97a433c96066c6.

show more ...

[lldb] [mostly NFC] Large WP foundation: WatchpointResources (#68845)

This patch is rearranging code a bit to add WatchpointResources to
Process. A WatchpointResource is meant to represent a hardwa

[lldb] [mostly NFC] Large WP foundation: WatchpointResources (#68845)

This patch is rearranging code a bit to add WatchpointResources to
Process. A WatchpointResource is meant to represent a hardware
watchpoint register in the inferior process. It has an address, a size,
a type, and a list of Watchpoints that are using this
WatchpointResource.

This current patch doesn't add any of the features of
WatchpointResources that make them interesting -- a user asking to watch
a 24 byte object could watch this with three 8 byte WatchpointResources.
Or a Watchpoint on 1 byte at 0x1002 and a second watchpoint on 1 byte at
0x1003, these must both be served by a single WatchpointResource on that
doubleword at 0x1000 on a 64-bit target, if two hardware watchpoint
registers were used to track these separately, one of them may not be
hit. Or if you have one Watchpoint on a variable with a condition set,
and another Watchpoint on that same variable with a command defined or
different condition, or ignorecount, both of those Watchpoints need to
evaluate their criteria/commands when their WatchpointResource has been
hit.

There's a bit of code movement to rearrange things in the direction I'll
need for implementing this feature, so I want to start with reviewing &
landing this mostly NFC patch and we can focus on the algorithmic
choices about how WatchpointResources are shared and handled as they're
triggeed, separately.

This patch also stops printing "Watchpoint <n> hit: old value: <x>, new
vlaue: <y>" for Read watchpoints. I could make an argument for print
"Watchpoint <n> hit: current value <x>" but the current output doesn't
make any sense, and the user can print the value if they are
particularly interested. Read watchpoints are used primarily to
understand what code is reading a variable.

This patch adds more fallbacks for how to print the objects being
watched if we have types, instead of assuming they are all integral
values, so a struct will print its elements. As large watchpoints are
added, we'll be doing a lot more of those.

To track the WatchpointSP in the WatchpointResources, I changed the
internal API which took a WatchpointSP and devolved it to a Watchpoint*,
which meant touching several different Process files. I removed the
watchpoint code in ProcessKDP which only reported that watchpoints
aren't supported, the base class does that already.

I haven't yet changed how we receive a watchpoint to identify the
WatchpointResource responsible for the trigger, and identify all
Watchpoints that are using this Resource to evaluate their conditions
etc. This is the same work that a BreakpointSite needs to do when it has
been tiggered, where multiple Breakpoints may be at the same address.

There is not yet any printing of the Resources that a Watchpoint is
implemented in terms of ("watchpoint list", or
SBWatchpoint::GetDescription).

"watchpoint set var" and "watchpoint set expression" take a size
argument which was previously 1, 2, 4, or 8 (an enum). I've changed this
to an unsigned int. Most hardware implementations can only watch 1, 2,
4, 8 byte ranges, but with Resources we'll allow a user to ask for
different sized watchpoints and set them in hardware-expressble terms
soon.

I've annotated areas where I know there is work still needed with
LWP_TODO that I'll be working on once this is landed.

I've tested this on aarch64 macOS, aarch64 Linux, and Intel macOS.

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/72116

show more ...