Revision tags: llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3 |
|
#
b852fb1e |
| 25-Oct-2024 |
Jonas Devlieghere <jonas@devlieghere.com> |
[lldb] Move ValueObject into its own library (NFC) (#113393)
ValueObject is part of lldbCore for historical reasons, but conceptually
it deserves to be its own library. This does introduce a (link-
[lldb] Move ValueObject into its own library (NFC) (#113393)
ValueObject is part of lldbCore for historical reasons, but conceptually
it deserves to be its own library. This does introduce a (link-time) circular
dependency between lldbCore and lldbValueObject, which is unfortunate
but probably unavoidable because so many things in LLDB rely on
ValueObject. We already have cycles and these libraries are never built
as dylibs so while this doesn't improve the situation, it also doesn't
make things worse.
The header includes were updated with the following command:
```
find . -type f -exec sed -i.bak "s%include \"lldb/Core/ValueObject%include \"lldb/ValueObject/ValueObject%" '{}' \;
```
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1 |
|
#
4494c543 |
| 24-Sep-2024 |
Ryan Mansfield <ryan_mansfield@apple.com> |
[lldb] Fix typos in various help messages. (#109851)
|
#
d8d252fe |
| 20-Sep-2024 |
Adrian Vogelsgesang <avogelsgesang@salesforce.com> |
[lldb] Add support for disabling frame recognizers (#109219)
Sometimes you only want to temporarily disable a frame recognizer
instead of deleting it. In particular, when dealing with one of the
b
[lldb] Add support for disabling frame recognizers (#109219)
Sometimes you only want to temporarily disable a frame recognizer
instead of deleting it. In particular, when dealing with one of the
builtin frame recognizers, which cannot be restored after deletion.
To be able to write test cases for this functionality, I also changed
`lldb/test/API/commands/frame/recognizer` to use normal C instead of
Objective-C
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4 |
|
#
0642cd76 |
| 27-Aug-2024 |
Adrian Prantl <aprantl@apple.com> |
[lldb] Turn lldb_private::Status into a value type. (#106163)
This patch removes all of the Set.* methods from Status.
This cleanup is part of a series of patches that make it harder use the
ant
[lldb] Turn lldb_private::Status into a value type. (#106163)
This patch removes all of the Set.* methods from Status.
This cleanup is part of a series of patches that make it harder use the
anti-pattern of keeping a long-lives Status object around and updating
it while dropping any errors it contains on the floor.
This patch is largely NFC, the more interesting next steps this enables
is to:
1. remove Status.Clear()
2. assert that Status::operator=() never overwrites an error
3. remove Status::operator=()
Note that step (2) will bring 90% of the benefits for users, and step
(3) will dramatically clean up the error handling code in various
places. In the end my goal is to convert all APIs that are of the form
` ResultTy DoFoo(Status& error)
`
to
` llvm::Expected<ResultTy> DoFoo()
`
How to read this patch?
The interesting changes are in Status.h and Status.cpp, all other
changes are mostly
` perl -pi -e 's/\.SetErrorString/ = Status::FromErrorString/g' $(git
grep -l SetErrorString lldb/source)
`
plus the occasional manual cleanup.
show more ...
|
#
dd060bde |
| 27-Aug-2024 |
Adrian Vogelsgesang <avogelsgesang@salesforce.com> |
[lldb] Add frame recognizers for libc++ `std::invoke` (#105695)
With this commit, we also hide the implementation details of
`std::invoke`. To do so, the `LibCXXFrameRecognizer` got a couple more
[lldb] Add frame recognizers for libc++ `std::invoke` (#105695)
With this commit, we also hide the implementation details of
`std::invoke`. To do so, the `LibCXXFrameRecognizer` got a couple more
regular expressions.
The regular expression passed into `AddRecognizer` became problematic,
as it was evaluated on the demangled name. Those names also included
result types for C++ symbols. For `std::__invoke` the return type is a
huge `decltype(...)`, making the regular expresison really hard to
write.
Instead, I added support to `AddRecognizer` for matching on the
demangled names without result type and argument types.
By hiding the implementation details of `invoke`, also the back traces
for `std::function` become even nicer, because `std::function` is using
`__invoke` internally.
Co-authored-by: Adrian Prantl <aprantl@apple.com>
show more ...
|
#
3c0fba4f |
| 23-Aug-2024 |
Adrian Prantl <aprantl@apple.com> |
Revert "Revert "[lldb] Extend frame recognizers to hide frames from backtraces (#104523)""
This reverts commit 547917aebd1e79a8929b53f0ddf3b5185ee4df74.
|
#
547917ae |
| 22-Aug-2024 |
Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr@gmail.com> |
Revert "[lldb] Extend frame recognizers to hide frames from backtraces (#104523)"
This reverts commit f01f80ce6ca7640bb0e267b84b1ed0e89b57e2d9.
This commit introduces an msan violation. See the dis
Revert "[lldb] Extend frame recognizers to hide frames from backtraces (#104523)"
This reverts commit f01f80ce6ca7640bb0e267b84b1ed0e89b57e2d9.
This commit introduces an msan violation. See the discussion on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/104523.
show more ...
|
#
f01f80ce |
| 20-Aug-2024 |
Adrian Prantl <aprantl@apple.com> |
[lldb] Extend frame recognizers to hide frames from backtraces (#104523)
Compilers and language runtimes often use helper functions that are
fundamentally uninteresting when debugging anything but
[lldb] Extend frame recognizers to hide frames from backtraces (#104523)
Compilers and language runtimes often use helper functions that are
fundamentally uninteresting when debugging anything but the
compiler/runtime itself. This patch introduces a user-extensible
mechanism that allows for these frames to be hidden from backtraces and
automatically skipped over when navigating the stack with `up` and
`down`.
This does not affect the numbering of frames, so `f <N>` will still
provide access to the hidden frames. The `bt` output will also print a
hint that frames have been hidden.
My primary motivation for this feature is to hide thunks in the Swift
programming language, but I'm including an example recognizer for
`std::function::operator()` that I wished for myself many times while
debugging LLDB.
rdar://126629381
Example output. (Yes, my proof-of-concept recognizer could hide even
more frames if we had a method that returned the function name without
the return type or I used something that isn't based off regex, but it's
really only meant as an example).
before:
```
(lldb) thread backtrace --filtered=false
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
* frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10
frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25
frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12
frame #3: 0x0000000100003968 a.out`std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff280, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:171:12
frame #4: 0x00000001000026bc a.out`std::__1::__function::__func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()(this=0x000000016fdff278, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:313:10
frame #5: 0x0000000100003c38 a.out`std::__1::__function::__value_func<int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff278, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) const at function.h:430:12
frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10
frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10
frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476
(lldb)
```
after
```
(lldb) bt
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
* frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10
frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25
frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12
frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10
frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10
frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476
Note: Some frames were hidden by frame recognizers
```
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2 |
|
#
8398ad9c |
| 31-Jul-2024 |
Jonas Devlieghere <jonas@devlieghere.com> |
[lldb] Unify the way we get the Target in CommandObject (#101208)
Currently, CommandObjects are obtaining a target in a variety of ways.
Often the command incorrectly operates on the selected targe
[lldb] Unify the way we get the Target in CommandObject (#101208)
Currently, CommandObjects are obtaining a target in a variety of ways.
Often the command incorrectly operates on the selected target. As an
example, when a breakpoint command is running, the current target is
passed into the command but the target that hit the breakpoint is not
the selected target. In other places we use the CommandObject's
execution context, which is frozen during the execution of the command,
and comes with its own limitations. Finally, we often want to fall back
to the dummy target if no real target is available.
Instead of having to guess how to get the target, this patch introduces
one helper function in CommandObject to get the most relevant target. In
order of priority, that's the target from the command object's execution
context, from the interpreter's execution context, the selected target
or the dummy target.
rdar://110846511
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init |
|
#
d1bc75c0 |
| 17-Jun-2024 |
Adrian Prantl <aprantl@apple.com> |
Convert ValueObject::Dump() to return llvm::Error() (NFCish)
This change by itself has no measurable effect on the LLDB testsuite. I'm making it in preparation for threading through more errors in t
Convert ValueObject::Dump() to return llvm::Error() (NFCish)
This change by itself has no measurable effect on the LLDB testsuite. I'm making it in preparation for threading through more errors in the Swift language plugin.
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1 |
|
#
2d704f4b |
| 27-Feb-2024 |
jimingham <jingham@apple.com> |
Start to clean up the process of defining command arguments. (#83097)
Partly, there's just a lot of unnecessary boiler plate. It's also
possible to define combinations of arguments that make no sen
Start to clean up the process of defining command arguments. (#83097)
Partly, there's just a lot of unnecessary boiler plate. It's also
possible to define combinations of arguments that make no sense (e.g.
eArgRepeatPlus followed by eArgRepeatPlain...) but these are never
checked since we just push_back directly into the argument definitions.
This commit is step 1 of this cleanup - do the obvious stuff. In it, all
the simple homogenous argument lists and the breakpoint/watchpoint
ID/Range types, are set with common functions. This is an NFC change, it
just centralizes boiler plate. There's no checking yet because you can't
get a single argument wrong.
The end goal is that all argument definition goes through functions and
m_arguments is hidden so that you can't define inconsistent argument
sets.
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3 |
|
#
563ef306 |
| 20-Feb-2024 |
jimingham <jingham@apple.com> |
Add the RegisterCompleter to eArgTypeRegisterName in g_argument_table (#82428)
This is a follow-on to:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82085
The completer for register names was miss
Add the RegisterCompleter to eArgTypeRegisterName in g_argument_table (#82428)
This is a follow-on to:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82085
The completer for register names was missing from the argument table. I
somehow missed that the only register completer test was x86_64, so that
test broke.
I added the completer in to the right slot in the argument table, and
added a small completions test that just uses the alias register names.
If we end up having a platform that doesn't define register names, we'll
have to skip this test there, but it should add a sniff test for
register completion that will run most everywhere.
show more ...
|
#
9ed8b272 |
| 20-Feb-2024 |
Shubham Sandeep Rastogi <srastogi22@apple.com> |
Revert "Centralize the handling of completion for simple argument lists. (#82085)"
This reverts commit 21631494b068d9364b8dc8f18e59adee9131a0a5.
Reverted because of greendragon failure:
**********
Revert "Centralize the handling of completion for simple argument lists. (#82085)"
This reverts commit 21631494b068d9364b8dc8f18e59adee9131a0a5.
Reverted because of greendragon failure:
******************** TEST 'lldb-api :: functionalities/completion/TestCompletion.py' FAILED ******************** Script:
show more ...
|
#
21631494 |
| 20-Feb-2024 |
jimingham <jingham@apple.com> |
Centralize the handling of completion for simple argument lists. (#82085)
Most commands were adding argument completion handling by themselves,
resulting in a lot of unnecessary boilerplate. In man
Centralize the handling of completion for simple argument lists. (#82085)
Most commands were adding argument completion handling by themselves,
resulting in a lot of unnecessary boilerplate. In many cases, this could
be done generically given the argument definition and the entries in the
g_argument_table.
I'm going to address this in a couple passes. In this first pass, I
added handling of commands that have only one argument list, with one
argument type, either single or repeated, and changed all the commands
that are of this sort (and don't have other bits of business in their
completers.)
I also added some missing connections between arg types and completions
to the table, and added a RemoteFilename and RemotePath to use in places
where we were using the Remote completers. Those arguments used to say
they were "files" but they were in fact remote files.
I also added a module arg type to use where we were using the module
completer. In that case, we should call the argument module.
show more ...
|
#
c2b01c87 |
| 12-Feb-2024 |
jimingham <jingham@apple.com> |
Make ValueObjectPrinter's handling of its ValueObject pointers more principled (NFC) (#81314)
I get a small but fairly steady stream of crash reports which I can only
explain by ValueObjectPrinter
Make ValueObjectPrinter's handling of its ValueObject pointers more principled (NFC) (#81314)
I get a small but fairly steady stream of crash reports which I can only
explain by ValueObjectPrinter trying to access its m_valobj field, and
finding it NULL. I have never been able to reproduce any of these, and
the reports show a state too long after the fact to know what went
wrong.
I've read through this section of lldb a bunch of times trying to figure
out how this could happen, but haven't ever found anything actually
wrong that could cause this. OTOH, ValueObjectPrinter is somewhat sloppy
about how it handles the ValueObject it is printing.
a) lldb allows you to make a ValueObjectPrinter with a Null incoming
ValueObject. However, there's no affordance to set the ValueObject in
the Printer after the fact, and it doesn't really make sense to do that.
So I change the ValueObjectPrinter API's to take a ValueObject
reference, rather than a pointer. All the places that make
ValueObjectPrinters already check the non-null status of their
ValueObject's before making the ValueObjectPrinter, so sadly, I didn't
find the bug, but this will enforce the intent.
b) The next step in printing the ValueObject is deciding which of the
associated DynamicValue/SyntheticValue we are actually printing (based
on the use_dynamic and use_synthetic settings in the original
ValueObject. This was put in a pointer by GetMostSpecializedValue, but
most of the printer code just accessed the pointer, and it was hard to
reason out whether we were guaranteed to always call this before using
m_valobj. So far as I could see we always do (sigh, didn't find the bug
there either) but this was way too hard to reason about.
In fact, we figure out once which ValueObject we're going to print and
don't change that through the life of the printer. So I changed this to
both set the "most specialized value" in the constructor, and then to
always access it through GetMostSpecializedValue(). That makes it easier
to reason about the use of this ValueObject as well.
This is an NFC change, all it does is make the code easier to reason
about.
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init |
|
#
9110c2b4 |
| 16-Jan-2024 |
Alexandre Ganea <alex_toresh@yahoo.fr> |
[lldb] On Windows, silence warning with latest MSVC
This fixes: ``` [6083/7449] Building CXX object tools\lldb\source\Commands\CMakeFiles\lldbCommands.dir\CommandObjectFrame.cpp.obj C:\git\llvm-proj
[lldb] On Windows, silence warning with latest MSVC
This fixes: ``` [6083/7449] Building CXX object tools\lldb\source\Commands\CMakeFiles\lldbCommands.dir\CommandObjectFrame.cpp.obj C:\git\llvm-project\lldb\source\Commands\CommandObjectFrame.cpp(497) : warning C4715: 'CommandObjectFrameVariable::ScopeRequested': not all control paths return a value ```
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4 |
|
#
7fbd427f |
| 31-Oct-2023 |
Greg Clayton <gclayton@fb.com> |
Add the ability to get a C++ vtable ValueObject from another ValueObj… (#67599)
Add the ability to get a C++ vtable ValueObject from another
ValueObject.
This patch adds the ability to ask a Val
Add the ability to get a C++ vtable ValueObject from another ValueObj… (#67599)
Add the ability to get a C++ vtable ValueObject from another
ValueObject.
This patch adds the ability to ask a ValueObject for a ValueObject that
represents the virtual function table for a C++ class. If the
ValueObject is not a C++ class with a vtable, a valid ValueObject value
will be returned that contains an appropriate error. If it is successful
a valid ValueObject that represents vtable will be returned. The
ValueObject that is returned will have a name that matches the demangled
value for a C++ vtable mangled name like "vtable for <class-name>". It
will have N children, one for each virtual function pointer. Each
child's value is the function pointer itself, the summary is the
symbolication of this function pointer, and the type will be a valid
function pointer from the debug info if there is debug information
corresponding to the virtual function pointer.
The vtable SBValue will have the following:
- SBValue::GetName() returns "vtable for <class>"
- SBValue::GetValue() returns a string representation of the vtable
address
- SBValue::GetSummary() returns NULL
- SBValue::GetType() returns a type appropriate for a uintptr_t type for
the current process
- SBValue::GetLoadAddress() returns the address of the vtable adderess
- SBValue::GetValueAsUnsigned(...) returns the vtable address
- SBValue::GetNumChildren() returns the number of virtual function
pointers in the vtable
- SBValue::GetChildAtIndex(...) returns a SBValue that represents a
virtual function pointer
The child SBValue objects that represent a virtual function pointer has
the following values:
- SBValue::GetName() returns "[%u]" where %u is the vtable function
pointer index
- SBValue::GetValue() returns a string representation of the virtual
function pointer
- SBValue::GetSummary() returns a symbolicated respresentation of the
virtual function pointer
- SBValue::GetType() returns the function prototype type if there is
debug info, or a generic funtion prototype if there is no debug info
- SBValue::GetLoadAddress() returns the address of the virtual function
pointer
- SBValue::GetValueAsUnsigned(...) returns the virtual function pointer
- SBValue::GetNumChildren() returns 0
- SBValue::GetChildAtIndex(...) returns invalid SBValue for any index
Examples of using this API via python:
```
(lldb) script vtable = lldb.frame.FindVariable("shape_ptr").GetVTable()
(lldb) script vtable
vtable for Shape = 0x0000000100004088 {
[0] = 0x0000000100003d20 a.out`Shape::~Shape() at main.cpp:3
[1] = 0x0000000100003e4c a.out`Shape::~Shape() at main.cpp:3
[2] = 0x0000000100003e7c a.out`Shape::area() at main.cpp:4
[3] = 0x0000000100003e3c a.out`Shape::optional() at main.cpp:7
}
(lldb) script c = vtable.GetChildAtIndex(0)
(lldb) script c
(void ()) [0] = 0x0000000100003d20 a.out`Shape::~Shape() at main.cpp:3
```
show more ...
|
#
92d8a28c |
| 30-Oct-2023 |
Pete Lawrence <plawrence@apple.com> |
[lldb] Part 2 of 2 - Refactor `CommandObject::DoExecute(...)` return `void` (not `bool`) (#69991)
[lldb] Part 2 of 2 - Refactor `CommandObject::DoExecute(...)` to return
`void` instead of ~~`bool`~
[lldb] Part 2 of 2 - Refactor `CommandObject::DoExecute(...)` return `void` (not `bool`) (#69991)
[lldb] Part 2 of 2 - Refactor `CommandObject::DoExecute(...)` to return
`void` instead of ~~`bool`~~
Justifications:
- The code doesn't ultimately apply the `true`/`false` return values.
- The methods already pass around a `CommandReturnObject`, typically
with a `result` parameter.
- Each command return object already contains:
- A more precise status
- The error code(s) that apply to that status
Part 1 refactors the `CommandObject::Execute(...)` method.
- See
[https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69989](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69989)
rdar://117378957
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init |
|
#
8b19d13f |
| 14-Jul-2023 |
Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan <fpiovezan@apple.com> |
[lldb] Make frame var --regex always search globals
Currently frame var --regex sometimes searches globals, sometimes it doesn't. This happens because `StackFrame::GetVariableList` always returns th
[lldb] Make frame var --regex always search globals
Currently frame var --regex sometimes searches globals, sometimes it doesn't. This happens because `StackFrame::GetVariableList` always returns the biggest list it has, regardless of whether only globals were requested or not. In other words, if a previous call to `GetVariableList` requested globals, all subsequent calls will see them.
The implication here is that users of `StackFrame::GetVariableList` are expected to filter the results of this function. This is what we do for a vanilla `frame var` command. But it is not what we do when `--regex` is used. This commit solves the issue by:
1. Making `--regex` imply `--globals`. This matches the behavior of `frame var <some_name>`, which will also search the global scope. 2. Making the `--regex` search respect the command object options.
See the added test for an example of the oddities this patch addresses. Without the patch, the test fails. However it could be made to pass by calling a plain `frame var` before calling `frame var --regex A::`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155334
show more ...
|
#
8bc97a3e |
| 14-Jul-2023 |
Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan <fpiovezan@apple.com> |
[lldb][NFC] Factor out CommandObject code filtering results based on scope
We will need this code in a subsequent commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155332
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5 |
|
#
2b0c8865 |
| 23-May-2023 |
Jim Ingham <jingham@apple.com> |
Refine the reporting mechanism for interruption.
Also, make it possible for new Targets which haven't been added to the TargetList yet to check for interruption, and add a few more places in buildin
Refine the reporting mechanism for interruption.
Also, make it possible for new Targets which haven't been added to the TargetList yet to check for interruption, and add a few more places in building modules where we can check for interruption.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154542
show more ...
|
#
6a9c3e61 |
| 06-Jun-2023 |
Med Ismail Bennani <ismail@bennani.ma> |
[lldb/Commands] Add support to auto-completion for user commands
This patch should allow the user to set specific auto-completion type for their custom commands.
To do so, we had to hoist the `Comp
[lldb/Commands] Add support to auto-completion for user commands
This patch should allow the user to set specific auto-completion type for their custom commands.
To do so, we had to hoist the `CompletionType` enum so the user can access it and add a new completion type flag to the CommandScriptAdd Command Object.
So now, the user can specify which completion type will be used with their custom command, when they register it.
This also makes the `crashlog` custom commands use disk-file completion type, to browse through the user file system and load the report.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152011
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <ismail@bennani.ma>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3 |
|
#
076341d1 |
| 21-Apr-2023 |
Jim Ingham <jingham@apple.com> |
Make sure SelectMostRelevantFrame happens only when returning to the user.
This is a user facing action, it is meant to focus the user's attention on something other than the 0th frame when you stop
Make sure SelectMostRelevantFrame happens only when returning to the user.
This is a user facing action, it is meant to focus the user's attention on something other than the 0th frame when you stop somewhere where that's helpful. For instance, stopping in pthread_kill after an assert will select the assert frame.
This is not something you want to have happen internally in lldb, both because internally you really don't want the selected frame changing out from under you, and because the recognizers can do arbitrary work, and that can cause deadlocks or other unexpected behavior.
However, it's not something that the current code does explicitly after a stop has been delivered, it's expected to happen implicitly as part of stopping. I changing this to call SMRF explicitly after a user stop, but that got pretty ugly quickly.
So I added a bool to control whether to run this and audited all the current uses to determine whether we're returning to the user or not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148863
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7 |
|
#
984b800a |
| 09-Jan-2023 |
serge-sans-paille <sguelton@mozilla.com> |
Move from llvm::makeArrayRef to ArrayRef deduction guides - last part
This is a follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D140896, split into several parts as it touches a lot of files.
Differential Re
Move from llvm::makeArrayRef to ArrayRef deduction guides - last part
This is a follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D140896, split into several parts as it touches a lot of files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141298
show more ...
|
#
2fe83274 |
| 07-Jan-2023 |
Kazu Hirata <kazu@google.com> |
[lldb] Use std::optional instead of llvm::Optional (NFC)
This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<. I'll post a separate patch to clean up the "using" declarations, #include "llvm/
[lldb] Use std::optional instead of llvm::Optional (NFC)
This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<. I'll post a separate patch to clean up the "using" declarations, #include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h", etc.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
show more ...
|