|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5 |
|
| #
2238dcc3 |
| 25-May-2023 |
Jonas Devlieghere <jonas@devlieghere.com> |
[NFC][Py Reformat] Reformat python files in lldb
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problem
[NFC][Py Reformat] Reformat python files in lldb
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2 |
|
| #
8ccfcab3 |
| 03-Jan-2022 |
Pavel Labath <pavel@labath.sk> |
[lldb/platform-gdb] Clear cached protocol state upon disconnection
Previously we would persist the flags indicating whether the remote side
supports a particular feature across reconnects, which is
[lldb/platform-gdb] Clear cached protocol state upon disconnection
Previously we would persist the flags indicating whether the remote side
supports a particular feature across reconnects, which is obviously not
a good idea.
I implement the clearing by nuking (its the only way to be sure :) the
entire GDBRemoteCommunication object in the disconnect operation and
creating a new one upon connection. This allows us to maintain a nice
invariant that the GDBRemoteCommunication object (which is now a
pointer) exists only if it is connected. The downside to that is that a
lot of functions now needs to check the validity of the pointer instead
of blindly accessing the object.
The process communication does not suffer from the same issue because we
always destroy the entire Process object for a relaunch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116539
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
7c8ae65f |
| 18-Nov-2021 |
Pavel Labath <pavel@labath.sk> |
[lldb/test] Make it possible to run the mock gdb server on a single thread
This is a preparatory commit to enable mocking of qemu startup. That
will involve running the mock server in a separate pro
[lldb/test] Make it possible to run the mock gdb server on a single thread
This is a preparatory commit to enable mocking of qemu startup. That
will involve running the mock server in a separate process, so there's
no need for multithreading.
Initialization is moved from the start function into the constructor
(which can then take an actual socket instead of a class), and the run
method is made public.
Depends on D114156.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114157
show more ...
|
| #
33c0f93f |
| 11-Nov-2021 |
Pavel Labath <pavel@labath.sk> |
[lldb/test] Move gdb client utils into the packages tree
This infrastructure has proven proven its worth, so give it a more
prominent place.
My immediate motivation for this is the desire to reuse
[lldb/test] Move gdb client utils into the packages tree
This infrastructure has proven proven its worth, so give it a more
prominent place.
My immediate motivation for this is the desire to reuse this
infrastructure for qemu platform testing, but I believe this move makes
sense independently of that. Moving this code to the packages tree will
allow as to add more structure to the gdb client tests -- currently they
are all crammed into the same test folder as that was the only way they
could access this code.
I'm splitting the code into two parts while moving it. The first once
contains just the generic gdb protocol wrappers, while the other one
contains the unit test glue. The reason for that is that for qemu
testing, I need to run the gdb code in a separate process, so I will
only be using the first part there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113893
show more ...
|