[lldb][test] Break early when walking backtrace in concurrent tests

We only need to see that 1 frame of the stack is in user code. No need
to carry on looking.

Doing so actually caused a test failu

[lldb][test] Break early when walking backtrace in concurrent tests

We only need to see that 1 frame of the stack is in user code. No need
to carry on looking.

Doing so actually caused a test failure on Armv8 Ubuntu Jammy where
a libc function does not have a display name. I'm sure I'm going to
get stung by this elsewhere, but for this test, breaking early
sidesteps the problem.

show more ...

[lldb] Fix the flakey Concurrent tests on macOS (#81710)

The concurrent tests all do a pthread_join at the end, and
concurrent_base.py stops after that pthread_join and sanity checks that
only 1 t

[lldb] Fix the flakey Concurrent tests on macOS (#81710)

The concurrent tests all do a pthread_join at the end, and
concurrent_base.py stops after that pthread_join and sanity checks that
only 1 thread is running. On macOS, after pthread_join() has completed,
there can be an extra thread still running which is completing the
details of that task asynchronously; this causes testsuite failures.
When this happens, we see the second thread is in

```
frame #0: 0x0000000180ce7700 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__ulock_wake + 8
frame #1: 0x0000000180d25ad4 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_joiner_wake + 52
frame #2: 0x0000000180d23c18 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_terminate + 384
frame #3: 0x0000000180d23a98 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_terminate_invoke + 92
frame #4: 0x0000000180d26740 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_exit + 112
frame #5: 0x0000000180d26040 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_start + 148
```

there are none of the functions from the test file present on this
thread.

In this patch, instead of counting the number of threads, I iterate over
the threads looking for functions from our test file (by name) and only
count threads that have at least one of them.

It's a lower frequency failure than the darwin kernel bug causing an
extra step instruction mach exception when hardware
breakpoint/watchpoints are used, but once I fixed that, this came up as
the next most common failure for these tests.

rdar://110555062

show more ...

[lldb] Add support for large watchpoints in lldb (#79962)

This patch is the next piece of work in my Large Watchpoint proposal,
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/7211

[lldb] Add support for large watchpoints in lldb (#79962)

This patch is the next piece of work in my Large Watchpoint proposal,
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/72116

This patch breaks a user's watchpoint into one or more
WatchpointResources which reflect what the hardware registers can cover.
This means we can watch objects larger than 8 bytes, and we can watched
unaligned address ranges. On a typical 64-bit target with 4 watchpoint
registers you can watch 32 bytes of memory if the start address is
doubleword aligned.

Additionally, if the remote stub implements AArch64 MASK style
watchpoints (e.g. debugserver on Darwin), we can watch any power-of-2
size region of memory up to 2GB, aligned to that same size.

I updated the Watchpoint constructor and CommandObjectWatchpoint to
create a CompilerType of Array<UInt8> when the size of the watched
region is greater than pointer-size and we don't have a variable type to
use. For pointer-size and smaller, we can display the watched granule as
an integer value; for larger-than-pointer-size we will display as an
array of bytes.

I have `watchpoint list` now print the WatchpointResources used to
implement the watchpoint.

I added a WatchpointAlgorithm class which has a top-level static method
that takes an enum flag mask WatchpointHardwareFeature and a user
address and size, and returns a vector of WatchpointResources covering
the request. It does not take into account the number of watchpoint
registers the target has, or the number still available for use. Right
now there is only one algorithm, which monitors power-of-2 regions of
memory. For up to pointer-size, this is what Intel hardware supports.
AArch64 Byte Address Select watchpoints can watch any number of
contiguous bytes in a pointer-size memory granule, that is not currently
supported so if you ask to watch bytes 3-5, the algorithm will watch the
entire doubleword (8 bytes). The newly default "modify" style means we
will silently ignore modifications to bytes outside the watched range.

I've temporarily skipped TestLargeWatchpoint.py for all targets. It was
only run on Darwin when using the in-tree debugserver, which was a proxy
for "debugserver supports MASK watchpoints". I'll be adding the
aforementioned feature flag from the stub and enabling full mask
watchpoints when a debugserver with that feature is enabled, and
re-enable this test.

I added a new TestUnalignedLargeWatchpoint.py which only has one test
but it's a great one, watching a 22-byte range that is unaligned and
requires four 8-byte watchpoints to cover.

I also added a unit test, WatchpointAlgorithmsTests, which has a number
of simple tests against WatchpointAlgorithms::PowerOf2Watchpoints. I
think there's interesting possible different approaches to how we cover
these; I note in the unit test that a user requesting a watch on address
0x12e0 of 120 bytes will be covered by two watchpoints today, a
128-bytes at 0x1280 and at 0x1300. But it could be done with a 16-byte
watchpoint at 0x12e0 and a 128-byte at 0x1300, which would have fewer
false positives/private stops. As we try refining this one, it's helpful
to have a collection of tests to make sure things don't regress.

I tested this on arm64 macOS, (genuine) x86_64 macOS, and AArch64
Ubuntu. I have not modifed the Windows process plugins yet, I might try
that as a standalone patch, I'd be making the change blind, but the
necessary changes (see ProcessGDBRemote::EnableWatchpoint) are pretty
small so it might be obvious enough that I can change it and see what
the Windows CI thinks.

There isn't yet a packet (or a qSupported feature query) for the gdb
remote serial protocol stub to communicate its watchpoint capabilities
to lldb. I'll be doing that in a patch right after this is landed,
having debugserver advertise its capability of AArch64 MASK watchpoints,
and have ProcessGDBRemote add eWatchpointHardwareArmMASK to
WatchpointAlgorithms so we can watch larger than 32-byte requests on
Darwin.

I haven't yet tackled WatchpointResource *sharing* by multiple
Watchpoints. This is all part of the goal, especially when we may be
watching a larger memory range than the user requested, if they then add
another watchpoint next to their first request, it may be covered by the
same WatchpointResource (hardware watchpoint register). Also one "read"
watchpoint and one "write" watchpoint on the same memory granule need to
be handled, making the WatchpointResource cover all requests.

As WatchpointResources aren't shared among multiple Watchpoints yet,
there's no handling of running the conditions/commands/etc on multiple
Watchpoints when their shared WatchpointResource is hit. The goal beyond
"large watchpoint" is to unify (much more) the Watchpoint and Breakpoint
behavior and commands. I have a feeling I may be slowly chipping away at
this for a while.

Re-landing this patch after fixing two undefined behaviors in
WatchpointAlgorithms found by UBSan and by failures on different
CI bots.

rdar://108234227

show more ...

Revert "[lldb] Add support for large watchpoints in lldb (#79962)"

This reverts commit 57c66b35a885b571f9897d75d18f1d974c29e533.

[lldb] Add support for large watchpoints in lldb (#79962)

This patch is the next piece of work in my Large Watchpoint proposal,
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/721

[lldb] Add support for large watchpoints in lldb (#79962)

This patch is the next piece of work in my Large Watchpoint proposal,
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/72116

This patch breaks a user's watchpoint into one or more
WatchpointResources which reflect what the hardware registers can cover.
This means we can watch objects larger than 8 bytes, and we can watched
unaligned address ranges. On a typical 64-bit target with 4 watchpoint
registers you can watch 32 bytes of memory if the start address is
doubleword aligned.

Additionally, if the remote stub implements AArch64 MASK style
watchpoints (e.g. debugserver on Darwin), we can watch any power-of-2
size region of memory up to 2GB, aligned to that same size.

I updated the Watchpoint constructor and CommandObjectWatchpoint to
create a CompilerType of Array<UInt8> when the size of the watched
region is greater than pointer-size and we don't have a variable type to
use. For pointer-size and smaller, we can display the watched granule as
an integer value; for larger-than-pointer-size we will display as an
array of bytes.

I have `watchpoint list` now print the WatchpointResources used to
implement the watchpoint.

I added a WatchpointAlgorithm class which has a top-level static method
that takes an enum flag mask WatchpointHardwareFeature and a user
address and size, and returns a vector of WatchpointResources covering
the request. It does not take into account the number of watchpoint
registers the target has, or the number still available for use. Right
now there is only one algorithm, which monitors power-of-2 regions of
memory. For up to pointer-size, this is what Intel hardware supports.
AArch64 Byte Address Select watchpoints can watch any number of
contiguous bytes in a pointer-size memory granule, that is not currently
supported so if you ask to watch bytes 3-5, the algorithm will watch the
entire doubleword (8 bytes). The newly default "modify" style means we
will silently ignore modifications to bytes outside the watched range.

I've temporarily skipped TestLargeWatchpoint.py for all targets. It was
only run on Darwin when using the in-tree debugserver, which was a proxy
for "debugserver supports MASK watchpoints". I'll be adding the
aforementioned feature flag from the stub and enabling full mask
watchpoints when a debugserver with that feature is enabled, and
re-enable this test.

I added a new TestUnalignedLargeWatchpoint.py which only has one test
but it's a great one, watching a 22-byte range that is unaligned and
requires four 8-byte watchpoints to cover.

I also added a unit test, WatchpointAlgorithmsTests, which has a number
of simple tests against WatchpointAlgorithms::PowerOf2Watchpoints. I
think there's interesting possible different approaches to how we cover
these; I note in the unit test that a user requesting a watch on address
0x12e0 of 120 bytes will be covered by two watchpoints today, a
128-bytes at 0x1280 and at 0x1300. But it could be done with a 16-byte
watchpoint at 0x12e0 and a 128-byte at 0x1300, which would have fewer
false positives/private stops. As we try refining this one, it's helpful
to have a collection of tests to make sure things don't regress.

I tested this on arm64 macOS, (genuine) x86_64 macOS, and AArch64
Ubuntu. I have not modifed the Windows process plugins yet, I might try
that as a standalone patch, I'd be making the change blind, but the
necessary changes (see ProcessGDBRemote::EnableWatchpoint) are pretty
small so it might be obvious enough that I can change it and see what
the Windows CI thinks.

There isn't yet a packet (or a qSupported feature query) for the gdb
remote serial protocol stub to communicate its watchpoint capabilities
to lldb. I'll be doing that in a patch right after this is landed,
having debugserver advertise its capability of AArch64 MASK watchpoints,
and have ProcessGDBRemote add eWatchpointHardwareArmMASK to
WatchpointAlgorithms so we can watch larger than 32-byte requests on
Darwin.

I haven't yet tackled WatchpointResource *sharing* by multiple
Watchpoints. This is all part of the goal, especially when we may be
watching a larger memory range than the user requested, if they then add
another watchpoint next to their first request, it may be covered by the
same WatchpointResource (hardware watchpoint register). Also one "read"
watchpoint and one "write" watchpoint on the same memory granule need to
be handled, making the WatchpointResource cover all requests.

As WatchpointResources aren't shared among multiple Watchpoints yet,
there's no handling of running the conditions/commands/etc on multiple
Watchpoints when their shared WatchpointResource is hit. The goal beyond
"large watchpoint" is to unify (much more) the Watchpoint and Breakpoint
behavior and commands. I have a feeling I may be slowly chipping away at
this for a while.

rdar://108234227

show more ...

[NFC][Py Reformat] Reformat python files in lldb

This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).

If you end up having problem

[NFC][Py Reformat] Reformat python files in lldb

This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).

If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.

RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460

show more ...

[test] Remove unused `unittest2` import from concurrent_base.py

[lldb] Start from end of previous substr when checking ordered substrs

I'm trying to add a test which tests that the same substr occurs twice in a row, but it matches even if only one of the substr

[lldb] Start from end of previous substr when checking ordered substrs

I'm trying to add a test which tests that the same substr occurs twice in a row, but it matches even if only one of the substr occurs.

This found a bug in concurrent_base.py.

Reviewed By: DavidSpickett

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135826

show more ...

[lldb][NFC] Remove 'from __future__ import print_function' from all tests that don't actually call 'print()'

Summary:
A lot of tests do this trick but the vast majority of them don't even call `prin

[lldb][NFC] Remove 'from __future__ import print_function' from all tests that don't actually call 'print()'

Summary:
A lot of tests do this trick but the vast majority of them don't even call `print()`.

Most of this patch was generated by a script that just looks at all the files and deletes the line if there is no `print (` or `print(` anywhere else in the file.
I checked the remaining tests manually and deleted the import if we never call print (but instead do stuff like `expr print(...)` and similar false-positives).
I also corrected the additional empty lines after the import in the files that I manually edited.

Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath, jfb

Reviewed By: labath

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, nemanjai, kbarton, christof, arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71452

show more ...

[lldb][NFC] Remove unused imports in python tests

llvm-svn: 367663

Move "concurrent events" tests back into one folder

These tests all test very similar things, and use the same inferior.
They were only placed in separate folders to achieve better
paralelization. N

Move "concurrent events" tests back into one folder

These tests all test very similar things, and use the same inferior.
They were only placed in separate folders to achieve better
paralelization. Now that we paralelize at a file level, this is no
longer relevant, and we can put them together again.

llvm-svn: 326159

show more ...

Wrap all references to build artifacts in the LLDB testsuite (NFC)

in TestBase::getBuildArtifact(). This NFC commit is in preparation for
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42281 (compile the LLDB tests out-

Wrap all references to build artifacts in the LLDB testsuite (NFC)

in TestBase::getBuildArtifact(). This NFC commit is in preparation for
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42281 (compile the LLDB tests out-of-tree).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42280

llvm-svn: 323007

show more ...

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging t

*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):

find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;

The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.

Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.

llvm-svn: 280751

show more ...

Breakup TestConcurrentEvents.py into separate test subdirs per test method

This change breaks up the monolithic TestConcurrentEvents.py into a
separate subdir per test method. This allows them to ru

Breakup TestConcurrentEvents.py into separate test subdirs per test method

This change breaks up the monolithic TestConcurrentEvents.py into a
separate subdir per test method. This allows them to run concurrently,
reduces the chance of a timeout occurring during normal operation, and
allows us to home in on any test methods that may be locking up.

This is step one in the process of squashing timeouts in these test
methods.

The reason for breaking each test method into its own file is to make it
very clear to us if there are a subset of the tests that do in fact lock
up frequently. This will limit how much hunting we need to do to
recreate it.

The reason for putting each file in a separate subdirectory is so that
our concurrent test runner can run multiple test files at the same time.
The unit of serialization in the LLDB test suite is the test directory,
so moving them into separate directories enables the test runner to do
more at the same time.

This change introduces usage of VPATH from gnu make. I use that to
facilitate keeping a single copy of the main.cpp in the parent
concurrent_events directory. Initially I had tried specifying the source
file as ../main.cpp, but our current makefile rules get confused by that
and then also build the output into the parent directory, which defeats
the ability to run each of the test methods concurrently. In the event
that not all systems support VPATH, I can do a bit of surgery on the
Makefile rules and attempt to make it smarter with regards to relative
paths to source files used in the build.

llvm-svn: 276478

show more ...