|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3 |
| #
dadbe88a |
| 06-Sep-2021 |
Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer@gmail.com> |
[libc++] Fix std::to_address(array).
There were basically two bugs here:
When C++20 `to_address` is called on `int arr[10]`, then `const _Ptr&` becomes
a reference to a const array, and then we dis
[libc++] Fix std::to_address(array).
There were basically two bugs here:
When C++20 `to_address` is called on `int arr[10]`, then `const _Ptr&` becomes
a reference to a const array, and then we dispatch to `__to_address<const int(&)[10]>`,
which, oops, gives us a `const int*` result instead of an `int*` result.
Solution: We need to provide the two standard-specified overloads of
`std::to_address` in exactly the same way that we provide two overloads
of `__to_address`.
When `__to_address` is called on a pointer type, `__to_address(const _Ptr&)`
is disabled so we successfully avoid trying to instantiate pointer_traits of
that pointer type. But when it's called on an array type, it's not disabled
for array types, so we go ahead and instantiate pointer_traits<int[10]>,
which goes boom. Solution: We need to disable `__to_address(const _Ptr&)`
for both pointer and array types. Also disable it for function types,
so that they get the nice error message; and put a test on it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109331
show more ...
|