[libc++] Remove the allocator<const T> extension (#96319)

This effort has quite a history:
- This was first attempted in 2022 via bed3240bf7d1, which broke
std::shared_ptr<T const> and caused the

[libc++] Remove the allocator<const T> extension (#96319)

This effort has quite a history:
- This was first attempted in 2022 via bed3240bf7d1, which broke
std::shared_ptr<T const> and caused the change to be reverted in
9138666f5464.
- We then re-attempted landing the change in 276ca87382b8 after fixing
std::shared_ptr, but reports were made that this broke code en masse
within Google. This led to the patch being reverted again in
a54d028895c9 with the goal to land this again with a migration path for
vendors.

This patch re-lands the removal while providing a migration path for
vendors by providing the `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_REMOVED_ALLOCATOR_CONST` macro.
This macro will be honored for the LLVM 19 release and will be removed
after that, at which point allocator<const T> will be removed
unconditionally.

Fixes #73665

show more ...

Revert "[libc++] Remove extension to support allocator<const T>"

This reverts commit 276ca873. That commit has quite a history at this
point. It was first landed in dbc647643577, which broke std::sh

Revert "[libc++] Remove extension to support allocator<const T>"

This reverts commit 276ca873. That commit has quite a history at this
point. It was first landed in dbc647643577, which broke std::shared_ptr<T const>
and was reverted in 9138666f5. It was then re-applied in 276ca873, with
the std::shared_ptr issue fixed, but it caused widespread breakage at
Google (which suggests it would cause similar breakage in the wild too),
so now I'm reverting again.

Instead, I will add a escape hatch that vendors can turn on to enable
the extension and perform a phased transition over one or two releases
like we sometimes do when things become non-trivial.

show more ...

[libc++] Remove extension to support allocator<const T>

This extension is a portability trap for users, since no other standard
library supports it. Furthermore, the Standard explicitly allows
imple

[libc++] Remove extension to support allocator<const T>

This extension is a portability trap for users, since no other standard
library supports it. Furthermore, the Standard explicitly allows
implementations to reject std::allocator<cv T>, so allowing it is
really going against the current.

This was discovered in D120684: this extension required `const_cast`ing
in `__construct_range_forward`, a fishy bit of code that can be removed
if we don't support the extension anymore.

This is a re-application of dbc647643577, which was reverted in 9138666f5
because it broke std::shared_ptr<T const>. Tests have now been added and
we've made sure that std::shared_ptr<T const> wouldn't be broken in this
version.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120996

show more ...

Revert "[libc++] Remove extension to support allocator<const T>"

This reverts commit bed3240bf7d196a17cc31f1c5b59b4721017e638.

I will need to add more tests for std::shared_ptr<T const> before
re-l

Revert "[libc++] Remove extension to support allocator<const T>"

This reverts commit bed3240bf7d196a17cc31f1c5b59b4721017e638.

I will need to add more tests for std::shared_ptr<T const> before
re-landing this.

show more ...

[libc++] Remove extension to support allocator<const T>

This extension is a portability trap for users, since no other standard
library supports it. Furthermore, the Standard explicitly allows
imple

[libc++] Remove extension to support allocator<const T>

This extension is a portability trap for users, since no other standard
library supports it. Furthermore, the Standard explicitly allows
implementations to reject std::allocator<cv T>, so allowing it is
really going against the current.

This was discovered in D120684: this extension required `const_cast`ing
in `__construct_range_forward`, a fishy bit of code that can be removed
if we don't support the extension anymore.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120996

show more ...

[libc++] Undeprecate the std::allocator<void> specialization

While the std::allocator<void> specialization was deprecated by
https://wg21.link/p0174#2.2, the *use* of std::allocator<void> by users
w

[libc++] Undeprecate the std::allocator<void> specialization

While the std::allocator<void> specialization was deprecated by
https://wg21.link/p0174#2.2, the *use* of std::allocator<void> by users
was not. The intent was that std::allocator<void> could still be used
in C++17 and C++20, but starting with C++20 (with the removal of the
specialization), std::allocator<void> would use the primary template.
That intent was called out in wg21.link/p0619r4#3.9.

As a result of this patch, _LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_ALLOCATOR_MEMBERS
will also not control whether the explicit specialization is provided or
not. It shouldn't matter, since in C++20, one can simply use the primary
template.

Fixes http://llvm.org/PR50299

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104323

show more ...

[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite

C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
ju

[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite

C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.

This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926

show more ...

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".

Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:

In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:

self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']

Run the tests and they all fail.

Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).

Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.

The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.

The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:

https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed

This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.

Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.

<rdar://problem/47754795>

Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF

Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624

llvm-svn: 353086

show more ...

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351648

show more ...

[libcxx] [test] Strip trailing whitespace. NFC.

llvm-svn: 328264

Implement LWG3035: std::allocator's constructors should be constexpr.

llvm-svn: 328059