|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1 |
|
| #
7afa1598 |
| 17-Sep-2022 |
Nikolas Klauser <nikolasklauser@berlin.de> |
[libc++] Avoid including <tuple> in compressed_pair.h
compressed_pair is widely used in the library, but most of the uses don't use the tuple parts. To avoid including <tuple> everywhere, use the fo
[libc++] Avoid including <tuple> in compressed_pair.h
compressed_pair is widely used in the library, but most of the uses don't use the tuple parts. To avoid including <tuple> everywhere, use the forward declaration instead in compressed_pair.h
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133331
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0 |
|
| #
d2baefae |
| 12-Mar-2022 |
Joe Loser <joeloser93@gmail.com> |
[libc++] Replace _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS with _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17. NFCI.
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBC
[libc++] Replace _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS with _LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17. NFCI.
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2 |
|
| #
d4853e63 |
| 18-Feb-2022 |
Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer@gmail.com> |
[libc++] [ranges] Permit std::mergeable and std::sortable with HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES.
This follows the general direction of D118736 that
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES` does *not* guard anythi
[libc++] [ranges] Permit std::mergeable and std::sortable with HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES.
This follows the general direction of D118736 that
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES` does *not* guard anything outside
of the `std::ranges::` namespace itself. This means we must permit
`ranges::less` etc. in no-ranges mode; that seems fine to me.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120139
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init |
|
| #
53406fb6 |
| 01-Feb-2022 |
Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer@gmail.com> |
[libc++] Guard much of std::ranges under _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES.
The logic here is that we are disabling *only* things in `std::ranges::`.
Everything in `std::` is permitted, including `de
[libc++] Guard much of std::ranges under _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES.
The logic here is that we are disabling *only* things in `std::ranges::`.
Everything in `std::` is permitted, including `default_sentinel`, `contiguous_iterator`,
`common_iterator`, `projected`, `swappable`, and so on. Then, we include
anything from `std::ranges::` that is required in order to make those things
work: `ranges::swap`, `ranges::swap_ranges`, `input_range`, `ranges::begin`,
`ranges::iter_move`, and so on. But then that's all. Everything else (including
notably all of the "views" and the `std::views` namespace itself) is still
locked up behind `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118736
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1 |
|
| #
8d0dfa0d |
| 30-Apr-2021 |
Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st> |
[libcxx] Reenable ranges for clang-cl
This reverts a224bf8ec423b42eea251407e7a6cc8398a5edf4 and fixes the
underlying issue.
The underlying issue is simply that MSVC headers contains a define
like "
[libcxx] Reenable ranges for clang-cl
This reverts a224bf8ec423b42eea251407e7a6cc8398a5edf4 and fixes the
underlying issue.
The underlying issue is simply that MSVC headers contains a define
like "#define __in", where __in is one macro in the MSVC Source
Code Annotation Language, defined in sal.h
Just use a different variable name than "__in"
__indirectly_readable_impl, and add "__in" to nasty_macros.h just
like the existing __out. (Also adding a couple more potentially
conflicting ones.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101613
show more ...
|
| #
a224bf8e |
| 23-Apr-2021 |
Christopher Di Bella <cjdb.ns@gmail.com> |
[libcxx] disables ranges for clang-cl
clang-cl doesn't properly handle concepts right now and is failing CI.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101205
|
| #
879cbac0 |
| 23-Apr-2021 |
zoecarver <z.zoelec2@gmail.com> |
[libc++][ranges] Add range.cmp: equal_to, not_equal_to, less, etc.
Adds the six new concept constrained comparisons.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100429
|