Revision tags: llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2 |
|
#
6a54dfbf |
| 31-Jul-2024 |
Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com> |
[libc++][NFC] Add missing license headers
Also standardize the license comment in several files where it was different from what we normally do.
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init |
|
#
520c7fbb |
| 12-Jun-2023 |
Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com> |
[libc++] Mark slow tests as unsupported on GCC
Some tests in our test suite are unbelievably slow on GCC due to the use of the always_inline attribute. See [1] for more details.
This patch introduc
[libc++] Mark slow tests as unsupported on GCC
Some tests in our test suite are unbelievably slow on GCC due to the use of the always_inline attribute. See [1] for more details.
This patch introduces the GCC-ALWAYS_INLINE-FIXME lit feature to disable tests that are plagued by that issue. At the same time, it moves several existing tests from ad-hoc `UNSUPPORTED: gcc-12` markup to the new GCC-ALWAYS_INLINE-FIXME feature, and marks the slowest tests reported by the CI as `UNSUPPORTED: GCC-ALWAYS_INLINE-FIXME`.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-stop-supporting-extern-instantiations-with-gcc/71277/1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152736
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5 |
|
#
dff62f52 |
| 17-May-2023 |
Mark de Wever <koraq@xs4all.nl> |
[libc++][format] Removes the experimental status.
The code has been quite ready for a while now and there are no more ABI breaking papers. So this is a good time to mark the feature as stable.
Revi
[libc++][format] Removes the experimental status.
The code has been quite ready for a while now and there are no more ABI breaking papers. So this is a good time to mark the feature as stable.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150802
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4 |
|
#
9b43aede |
| 03-Mar-2023 |
Mark de Wever <koraq@xs4all.nl> |
[libc++][format] Implements LWG3892.
This LWG issue is based on the discussion regarding
P2733R3 Fix handling of empty specifiers in std::format
This paper was disussed and changed a few times i
[libc++][format] Implements LWG3892.
This LWG issue is based on the discussion regarding
P2733R3 Fix handling of empty specifiers in std::format
This paper was disussed and changed a few times in LEWG during the Issaquah meeting. The paper was not voted in, instead LEWG asked for a DR against C++26.
This LWG issue contains the direction voted by LEWG. This issue has not been voted in yet. However it fixes some of the defencies on the container based formatting. Without this fix the range-default-formatter for strings looks bad when used in containers.
The changes of this issue match the intended changes of P27333.
type fmt before after (if changed) --------------------------------------------------------------- char {} a char {:?} 'a' array<char, 1> {} ['a'] array<char, 1> {::} [a] array<char, 1> {::c} [a] array<char, 1> {::?} ['a'] map<char, char> {} {a: a} -> {'a': 'a'} map<char, char> {::} {'a': 'a'} set<char> {} {'a'} set<char> {::} {a} set<char> {::c} {a} set<char> {::?} {'a'} tuple<char> {} ('a') stack<char> {} ['a'] stack<char> {::} [a] stack<char> {::c} [a] stack<char> {::?} ['a'] array<array<char, 1>, 1> {} [[a]] -> {'a': 'a'} array<array<char, 1>, 1> {::} [['a']] array<array<char, 1>, 1> {:::} [[a]] array<array<char, 1>, 1> {:::c} [[a]] array<array<char, 1>, 1> {:::?} [['a']] array<tuple<char>, 1> {} [(a)] -> [('a')] tuple<tuple<char>> {} ((a)) -> (('a')) tuple<array<char, 1>> {} ([a]) -> (['a'])
Note the optimization text as mentioned in the tuple formatter can't be done. The call to parse may affect the formatter so its state needs to be preserved.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145847
show more ...
|
#
f0fc8c48 |
| 18-Mar-2023 |
Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com> |
[libc++] Use named Lit features to flag back-deployment XFAILs
Instead of writing something like `XFAIL: use_system_cxx_lib && target=...` to XFAIL back-deployment tests, introduce named Lit feature
[libc++] Use named Lit features to flag back-deployment XFAILs
Instead of writing something like `XFAIL: use_system_cxx_lib && target=...` to XFAIL back-deployment tests, introduce named Lit features like `availability-shared_mutex-missing` to represent those. This makes the XFAIL annotations leaner, and solves the problem of XFAIL comments potentially getting out of sync. This would also make it easier for another vendor to add their own annotations to the test suite by simply changing how the feature is defined for their OS releases, instead of having to modify hundreds of tests to add repetitive annotations.
This doesn't touch *all* annotations -- only annotations that were widely duplicated are given named features (e.g. when filesystem or shared_mutex were introduced). I still think it probably doesn't make sense to have a named feature for every single fix we make to the dylib.
This is in essence a revert of 2659663, but since then the test suite has changed significantly. Back when I did 2659663, the configuration files we have for the test suite right now were being bootstrapped and it wasn't clear how to provide these features for back-deployment in that context. Since then, we have a streamlined way of defining these features in `features.py` and that doesn't impact the ability for a configuration file to stay minimal.
The original motivation for this change was that I am about to propose a change that would touch essentially all XFAIL annotations for back-deployment in the test suite, and this greatly reduces the number of lines changed by that upcoming change, in addition to making the test suite generally better.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146359
show more ...
|
#
3d334df5 |
| 16-Mar-2023 |
Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com> |
[libc++] Remove availability markup for std::format
std::format is currently experimental, so there is technically no deployment target requirement for it (since the only symbols required for it are
[libc++] Remove availability markup for std::format
std::format is currently experimental, so there is technically no deployment target requirement for it (since the only symbols required for it are in `libc++experimental.a`).
However, some parts of std::format depend indirectly on the floating point std::to_chars implementation, which does have deployment target requirements.
This patch removes all the availability format for std::format and updates the XFAILs in the tests to properly explain why they fail on old deployment targets, when they do. It also changes a couple of tests to avoid depending on floating-point std::to_chars when it isn't fundamental to the test.
Finally, some tests are marked as XFAIL but I added a comment saying
TODO FMT This test should not require std::to_chars(floating-point)
These tests do not fundamentally depend on floating-point std::to_chars, however they end up failing because calling std::format even without a floating-point argument to format will end up requiring floating-point std::to_chars. I believe this is an implementation artifact that could be avoided in all cases where we know the format string at compile-time. In the tests, I added the TODO comment only to the places where we could do better and actually avoid relying on floating-point std::to_chars because we know the format string at compile-time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134598
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init |
|
#
3476b56f |
| 21-Jan-2023 |
Mark de Wever <koraq@xs4all.nl> |
[libc++][test] Adds more generic test macros.
These macros are intended to replace the macros in rapid-cxx-test.h.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D1428
[libc++][test] Adds more generic test macros.
These macros are intended to replace the macros in rapid-cxx-test.h.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142808
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4 |
|
#
22e8525d |
| 05-May-2022 |
Mark de Wever <koraq@xs4all.nl> |
[libc++][format] Implements range_formatter
Implements parts of - P2286R8 Formatting Ranges - P2585R0 Improving default container formatting
Depends on D140651
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differe
[libc++][format] Implements range_formatter
Implements parts of - P2286R8 Formatting Ranges - P2585R0 Improving default container formatting
Depends on D140651
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140653
show more ...
|
#
f8bed136 |
| 17-Dec-2022 |
Mark de Wever <koraq@xs4all.nl> |
[libc++][format] Adds new test macros.
These macros make it easier to log additional information. This is useful for formatting tests. It also properly disables additional information when locales a
[libc++][format] Adds new test macros.
These macros make it easier to log additional information. This is useful for formatting tests. It also properly disables additional information when locales are disabled in libc++.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140651
show more ...
|
#
eb6e13cb |
| 05-May-2022 |
Mark de Wever <koraq@xs4all.nl> |
[libc++][format] Adds formatter for tuple and pair
Implements parts of - P2286R8 Formatting Ranges
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136775
|