[libc++][NFC] Add missing license headers

Also standardize the license comment in several files where it was
different from what we normally do.

[libc++][format] Removes the experimental status.

The code has been quite ready for a while now and there are no more ABI
breaking papers. So this is a good time to mark the feature as stable.

Revi

[libc++][format] Removes the experimental status.

The code has been quite ready for a while now and there are no more ABI
breaking papers. So this is a good time to mark the feature as stable.

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150802

show more ...

[libc++] Use named Lit features to flag back-deployment XFAILs

Instead of writing something like `XFAIL: use_system_cxx_lib && target=...`
to XFAIL back-deployment tests, introduce named Lit feature

[libc++] Use named Lit features to flag back-deployment XFAILs

Instead of writing something like `XFAIL: use_system_cxx_lib && target=...`
to XFAIL back-deployment tests, introduce named Lit features like
`availability-shared_mutex-missing` to represent those. This makes the
XFAIL annotations leaner, and solves the problem of XFAIL comments
potentially getting out of sync. This would also make it easier for
another vendor to add their own annotations to the test suite by simply
changing how the feature is defined for their OS releases, instead
of having to modify hundreds of tests to add repetitive annotations.

This doesn't touch *all* annotations -- only annotations that were widely
duplicated are given named features (e.g. when filesystem or shared_mutex
were introduced). I still think it probably doesn't make sense to have a
named feature for every single fix we make to the dylib.

This is in essence a revert of 2659663, but since then the test suite
has changed significantly. Back when I did 2659663, the configuration
files we have for the test suite right now were being bootstrapped and
it wasn't clear how to provide these features for back-deployment in
that context. Since then, we have a streamlined way of defining these
features in `features.py` and that doesn't impact the ability for a
configuration file to stay minimal.

The original motivation for this change was that I am about to propose
a change that would touch essentially all XFAIL annotations for back-deployment
in the test suite, and this greatly reduces the number of lines changed
by that upcoming change, in addition to making the test suite generally
better.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146359

show more ...

[libc++] Remove availability markup for std::format

std::format is currently experimental, so there is technically no
deployment target requirement for it (since the only symbols required
for it are

[libc++] Remove availability markup for std::format

std::format is currently experimental, so there is technically no
deployment target requirement for it (since the only symbols required
for it are in `libc++experimental.a`).

However, some parts of std::format depend indirectly on the floating
point std::to_chars implementation, which does have deployment target
requirements.

This patch removes all the availability format for std::format and
updates the XFAILs in the tests to properly explain why they fail
on old deployment targets, when they do. It also changes a couple
of tests to avoid depending on floating-point std::to_chars when
it isn't fundamental to the test.

Finally, some tests are marked as XFAIL but I added a comment saying

TODO FMT This test should not require std::to_chars(floating-point)

These tests do not fundamentally depend on floating-point std::to_chars,
however they end up failing because calling std::format even without a
floating-point argument to format will end up requiring floating-point
std::to_chars. I believe this is an implementation artifact that could
be avoided in all cases where we know the format string at compile-time.
In the tests, I added the TODO comment only to the places where we could
do better and actually avoid relying on floating-point std::to_chars
because we know the format string at compile-time.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134598

show more ...

[NFC][libc++] Removes GCC-11 support.

GCC-11 isn't supported in libc++ so remove UNSUPPORTED directives.

[libc++][format] Implement format-string.

Implements the compile-time checking of the formatting arguments.

Completes:
- P2216 std::format improvements

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Differential Re

[libc++][format] Implement format-string.

Implements the compile-time checking of the formatting arguments.

Completes:
- P2216 std::format improvements

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121530

show more ...