|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7 |
|
| #
9c4a716c |
| 29-May-2024 |
Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com> |
[clang] Preserve Qualifiers and type sugar in TemplateNames (#93433)
This patch improves the preservation of qualifiers and loss of type
sugar in TemplateNames.
This problem is analogous to https:/
[clang] Preserve Qualifiers and type sugar in TemplateNames (#93433)
This patch improves the preservation of qualifiers and loss of type
sugar in TemplateNames.
This problem is analogous to https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374 and this
patch takes a very similar approach to that patch, except the impact
here is much lesser.
When a TemplateName was written bare, without qualifications, we
wouldn't produce a QualifiedTemplate which could be used to disambiguate
it from a Canonical TemplateName. This had effects in the TemplateName
printer, which had workarounds to deal with this, and wouldn't print the
TemplateName as-written in most situations.
There are also some related fixes to help preserve this type sugar along
the way into diagnostics, so that this patch can be properly tested.
- Fix dropping the template keyword.
- Fix type deduction to preserve sugar in TST TemplateNames.
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init |
|
| #
b82dcb62 |
| 16-Jun-2023 |
Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com> |
[libc++] Move all the remaining .fail.cpp tests to .verify.cpp
I made sure they all had some expected-error output in them. Many of
these tests would be better implemented as a positive test using S
[libc++] Move all the remaining .fail.cpp tests to .verify.cpp
I made sure they all had some expected-error output in them. Many of
these tests would be better implemented as a positive test using SFINAE,
but this is beyond the scope of this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153980
show more ...
|