[libc++] Enable `explicit` conversion operators, even in C++03 mode.

C++03 didn't support `explicit` conversion operators;
but Clang's C++03 mode does, as an extension, so we can use it.
This lets u

[libc++] Enable `explicit` conversion operators, even in C++03 mode.

C++03 didn't support `explicit` conversion operators;
but Clang's C++03 mode does, as an extension, so we can use it.
This lets us make the conversion explicit in `std::function` (even in '03),
and remove some silly metaprogramming in `std::basic_ios`.

Drive-by improvements to the tests for these operators, in addition
to making sure all these tests also run in `c++03` mode.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104682

show more ...

Add include for 'test_macros.h' to all the tests that were missing them. Thanks to Zoe for the (big, but simple) patch. NFC intended.

llvm-svn: 362252

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".

Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:

In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:

self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']

Run the tests and they all fail.

Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).

Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.

The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.

The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:

https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed

This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.

Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.

<rdar://problem/47754795>

Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF

Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624

llvm-svn: 353086

show more ...

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351648

show more ...

[libc++] Implement exception_ptr on Windows

Summary:
This patch implements exception_ptr on Windows using the `__ExceptionPtrFoo` functions provided by MSVC.

The `__ExceptionPtrFoo` functions are d

[libc++] Implement exception_ptr on Windows

Summary:
This patch implements exception_ptr on Windows using the `__ExceptionPtrFoo` functions provided by MSVC.

The `__ExceptionPtrFoo` functions are defined inside the C++ standard library, `msvcprt`, which is unfortunate because it requires libc++ to link to the MSVC STL. However this doesn't seem to cause any immediate problems. However to be safe I kept all usages within the libc++ dylib so that user programs wouldn't have to link to MSVCPRT as well.

Note there are still 2 outstanding exception_ptr/nested_exception test failures.

* `current_exception.pass.cpp` needs to be rewritten for the Windows exception_ptr semantics which copy the exception every time.
* `rethrow_if_nested.pass.cpp` need investigation. It hits a stack overflow, likely from recursion.

This patch also gets most of the `<future>` tests passing as well.

Reviewers: mclow.lists, compnerd, bcraig, rmaprath, majnemer, BillyONeal, STL_MSFT

Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32927

llvm-svn: 302393

show more ...

Mark exception_ptr tests as XFAIL on Windows for now

llvm-svn: 300942

Move test into test/std subdirectory.

llvm-svn: 224658