Revision tags: llvmorg-21-init, llvmorg-19.1.7, llvmorg-19.1.6, llvmorg-19.1.5, llvmorg-19.1.4, llvmorg-19.1.3, llvmorg-19.1.2, llvmorg-19.1.1, llvmorg-19.1.0 |
|
#
33325524 |
| 12-Sep-2024 |
Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com> |
[libc++][modules] Refactor poisoned_hash_helper (#108296)
The poisoned_hash_helper header was relying on an implicit forward
declaration of std::hash located in <type_traits>. When we improve the
[libc++][modules] Refactor poisoned_hash_helper (#108296)
The poisoned_hash_helper header was relying on an implicit forward
declaration of std::hash located in <type_traits>. When we improve the
modularization of the library, that causes issues, in addition to being
a fundamentally non-portable assumption in the test suite.
It turns out that the reason for relying on a forward declaration is to
be able to test that std::hash is *not* provided if we don't include any
header that provides it. But testing that is actually both non-portable
and not really useful.
Indeed, what harm does it make if additional headers provide std::hash
specializations? That would certainly be conforming -- the Standard
never requires an implementation to avoid providing a declaration when a
given header is included, instead it mandates what *must* be provided
for sure. In that spirit, it would be conforming for e.g. `<cstddef>` to
define the hash specializations if that was our desire. I also don't
read https://wg21.link/P0513R0 as going against that statement. Hence,
this patch just removes that test which doesn't carry its weight.
Fixes #56938
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-19.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-19.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-20-init, llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init |
|
#
ac8c9f1e |
| 28-Nov-2023 |
Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com> |
[libc++] Properly guard std::filesystem with >= C++17 (#72701)
<filesystem> is a C++17 addition. In C++11 and C++14 modes, we actually
have all the code for <filesystem> but it is hidden behind a n
[libc++] Properly guard std::filesystem with >= C++17 (#72701)
<filesystem> is a C++17 addition. In C++11 and C++14 modes, we actually
have all the code for <filesystem> but it is hidden behind a non-inline
namespace __fs so it is not accessible. Instead of doing this unusual
dance, just guard the code for filesystem behind a classic C++17 check
like we normally do.
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6 |
|
#
c352fa74 |
| 05-Jun-2023 |
Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com> |
[libc++] Expand the contents of LIBCXX_ENABLE_FILESYSTEM
Since LIBCXX_ENABLE_FILESYSTEM now truly represents whether the platform supports a filesystem (as opposed to whether the <filesystem> librar
[libc++] Expand the contents of LIBCXX_ENABLE_FILESYSTEM
Since LIBCXX_ENABLE_FILESYSTEM now truly represents whether the platform supports a filesystem (as opposed to whether the <filesystem> library is provided), we can provide a few additional classes from the <filesystem> library even when the platform does not have support for a filesystem. For example, this allows performing path manipulations using std::filesystem::path even on platforms where there is no actual filesystem.
rdar://107061236
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152382
show more ...
|
Revision tags: llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4 |
|
#
efc494aa |
| 02-May-2023 |
Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com> |
[libc++] Add missing test for std::hash<std::filesystem::path>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149696
|