Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: llvmorg-18.1.8, llvmorg-18.1.7, llvmorg-18.1.6, llvmorg-18.1.5, llvmorg-18.1.4, llvmorg-18.1.3, llvmorg-18.1.2, llvmorg-18.1.1, llvmorg-18.1.0, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc4, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-18.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-19-init, llvmorg-17.0.6, llvmorg-17.0.5, llvmorg-17.0.4, llvmorg-17.0.3, llvmorg-17.0.2, llvmorg-17.0.1, llvmorg-17.0.0, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-17.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-18-init, llvmorg-16.0.6, llvmorg-16.0.5, llvmorg-16.0.4, llvmorg-16.0.3, llvmorg-16.0.2, llvmorg-16.0.1, llvmorg-16.0.0
# fb855eb9 14-Mar-2023 Mark de Wever <koraq@xs4all.nl>

[libc++] Qualifies size_t.

This has been done using the following command

find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)size_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;

And manually removed some fals

[libc++] Qualifies size_t.

This has been done using the following command

find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)size_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;

And manually removed some false positives in std/depr/depr.c.headers.

The `std` module doesn't export `::size_t`, this is a preparation for that module.

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, EricWF, philnik

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146088

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-16.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-16.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-17-init, llvmorg-15.0.7, llvmorg-15.0.6, llvmorg-15.0.5, llvmorg-15.0.4, llvmorg-15.0.3, working, llvmorg-15.0.2, llvmorg-15.0.1, llvmorg-15.0.0, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-15.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-16-init, llvmorg-14.0.6, llvmorg-14.0.5, llvmorg-14.0.4, llvmorg-14.0.3, llvmorg-14.0.2, llvmorg-14.0.1, llvmorg-14.0.0, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-14.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-15-init, llvmorg-13.0.1, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-13.0.0, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-13.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-14-init, llvmorg-12.0.1, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-12.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-12.0.0, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc3, llvmorg-12.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-13-init, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.1, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-11.0.0, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-12-init, llvmorg-10.0.1, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.1-rc2
# 31cbe0f2 01-Jun-2020 Louis Dionne <ldionne@apple.com>

[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite

C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
ju

[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite

C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.

This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.1-rc1
# 3e895085 02-May-2020 Marek Kurdej <marek@quasardb.net>

[libc++][P1115][C++20] Improving the Return Value of Erase-Like Algorithms II: Free erase/erase if.

Summary:
This patch adds return type to std::erase and std::erase_if functions.

Also:
* Update __

[libc++][P1115][C++20] Improving the Return Value of Erase-Like Algorithms II: Free erase/erase if.

Summary:
This patch adds return type to std::erase and std::erase_if functions.

Also:
* Update __cpp_lib_erase_if to 202002L.
* Fix synopsis in unordered_map.
* Fix generate_feature_test_macro_components.py script.

Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, ldionne, #libc

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Subscribers: broadwaylamb, zoecarver, dexonsmith, ldionne, libcxx-commits

Tags: #libc

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75905

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-10.0.0, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-10.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-11-init
# bf7dc572 13-Dec-2019 Stephan T. Lavavej <stl@microsoft.com>

[libcxx] [test] Fix valarray UB and MSVC warnings.

[libcxx] [test] Calling min and max on an empty valarray is UB.

libcxx/test/std/numerics/numarray/template.valarray/valarray.members/min.pass.cpp

[libcxx] [test] Fix valarray UB and MSVC warnings.

[libcxx] [test] Calling min and max on an empty valarray is UB.

libcxx/test/std/numerics/numarray/template.valarray/valarray.members/min.pass.cpp
libcxx/test/std/numerics/numarray/template.valarray/valarray.members/max.pass.cpp

The calls `v1.min();` and `v1.max();` were emitting nodiscard warnings
with MSVC's STL. Upon closer inspection, these calls were triggering
undefined behavior. N4842 [valarray.members] says:

"T min() const;
8 Preconditions: size() > 0 is true.
T max() const;
10 Preconditions: size() > 0 is true."

As these tests already provide coverage for non-empty valarrays
(immediately above), I've simply deleted the code for empty valarrays.

[libcxx] [test] Add macros to msvc_stdlib_force_include.h (NFC).

libcxx/test/support/msvc_stdlib_force_include.h

These macros are being used by:
libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.trans/meta.trans.other/result_of11.pass.cpp
Defining them to nothing allows that test to pass.

[libcxx] [test] Silence MSVC warning C5063 for is_constant_evaluated (NFC).

libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.const.eval/is_constant_evaluated.pass.cpp

This test is intentionally writing code that MSVC intentionally warns
about, so the warning should be silenced.

Additionally, comment an endif for clarity.

[libcxx] [test] Silence MSVC warning C4127 (NFC).

libcxx/test/support/charconv_test_helpers.h

MSVC avoids emitting this warning when it sees a single constexpr value
being tested, but this condition is a mix of compile-time and run-time.
Using push-disable-pop is the least intrusive way to silence this.

[libcxx] [test] Silence MSVC truncation warning (NFC).

libcxx/test/std/containers/sequences/vector/vector.cons/construct_iter_iter.pass.cpp

This test is intentionally truncating float to int, which MSVC
intentionally warns about, so push-disable-pop is necessary.

[libcxx] [test] Avoid truncation warnings in erase_if tests (NFC).

libcxx/test/std/containers/associative/map/map.erasure/erase_if.pass.cpp
libcxx/test/std/containers/associative/multimap/multimap.erasure/erase_if.pass.cpp
libcxx/test/std/containers/unord/unord.map/erase_if.pass.cpp
libcxx/test/std/containers/unord/unord.multimap/erase_if.pass.cpp

These tests use maps with `short` keys and values, emitting MSVC
truncation warnings from `int`. Adding `static_cast` to `key_type`
and `mapped_type` avoids these warnings.

As these tests require C++20 mode (or newer), for brevity I've changed
the multimap tests to use emplace to initialize the test data.
This has no effect on the erase_if testing.

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.1, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.1-rc1
# 6b77ebdc 23-Oct-2019 Louis Dionne <ldionne@apple.com>

[NFC] Strip trailing whitespace from libc++


Revision tags: llvmorg-9.0.0, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc6, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc2, llvmorg-9.0.0-rc1, llvmorg-10-init, llvmorg-8.0.1, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc3, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc2, llvmorg-8.0.1-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc5, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc4, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc3, llvmorg-7.1.0, llvmorg-7.1.0-rc1, llvmorg-8.0.0-rc2
# 2df59c50 04-Feb-2019 JF Bastien <jfbastien@apple.com>

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".

Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:

In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:

self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']

Run the tests and they all fail.

Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).

Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.

The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.

The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:

https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed

This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.

Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.

<rdar://problem/47754795>

Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF

Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624

llvm-svn: 353086

show more ...


Revision tags: llvmorg-8.0.0-rc1
# 57b08b09 19-Jan-2019 Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351648

show more ...


# f60c63c0 14-Dec-2018 Marshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com>

Implement P1209 - Adopt Consistent Container Erasure from Library Fundamentals 2 for C++20. Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D55532

llvm-svn: 349178