[libc++] Check correctly ref-qualified __is_callable in algorithms (#101553)

We were only checking that the comparator was rvalue callable,
when in reality the algorithms always call comparators as

[libc++] Check correctly ref-qualified __is_callable in algorithms (#101553)

We were only checking that the comparator was rvalue callable,
when in reality the algorithms always call comparators as lvalues.
This patch also refactors the tests for callable requirements and
expands it to a few missing algorithms.

This is take 2 of #73451, which was reverted because it broke some
CI bots. The issue was that we checked __is_callable with arguments
in the wrong order inside std::upper_bound. This has now been fixed
and a test was added.

Fixes #69554

show more ...

[libc++] Revert "Check correctly ref-qualified __is_callable in algorithms (#73451)"

This reverts commit 8d151f804ff43aaed1edf810bb2a07607b8bba14, which
broke some build bots. I think that is caused

[libc++] Revert "Check correctly ref-qualified __is_callable in algorithms (#73451)"

This reverts commit 8d151f804ff43aaed1edf810bb2a07607b8bba14, which
broke some build bots. I think that is caused by an invalid argument
order when checking __is_comparable in upper_bound.

show more ...

[libc++] Check correctly ref-qualified __is_callable in algorithms (#73451)

We were only checking that the comparator was rvalue callable,
when in reality the algorithms always call comparators as

[libc++] Check correctly ref-qualified __is_callable in algorithms (#73451)

We were only checking that the comparator was rvalue callable,
when in reality the algorithms always call comparators as lvalues.
This patch also refactors the tests for callable requirements and
expands it to a few missing algorithms.

Fixes #69554

show more ...

[libc++][ranges] fix `std::search_n` incorrect `static_assert`

[libc++][ranges] fix `std::search_n` incorrect `static_assert`
see more detail in https://reviews.llvm.org/D124079?#3661721

Differenti

[libc++][ranges] fix `std::search_n` incorrect `static_assert`

[libc++][ranges] fix `std::search_n` incorrect `static_assert`
see more detail in https://reviews.llvm.org/D124079?#3661721

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130124

show more ...

libcxx: Rename .hpp files in libcxx/test/support to .h

LLVM uses .h as its extension for header files.

Files renamed using:

for f in libcxx/test/support/*.hpp; do git mv $f ${f%.hpp}.h; done

libcxx: Rename .hpp files in libcxx/test/support to .h

LLVM uses .h as its extension for header files.

Files renamed using:

for f in libcxx/test/support/*.hpp; do git mv $f ${f%.hpp}.h; done

References to the files updated using:

for f in $(git diff master | grep 'rename from' | cut -f 3 -d ' '); do
a=$(basename $f);
echo $a;
rg -l $a libcxx | xargs sed -i '' "s/$a/${a%.hpp}.h/";
done

HPP include guards updated manually using:

for f in $(git diff master | grep 'rename from' | cut -f 3 -d ' '); do
echo ${f%.hpp}.h ;
done | xargs mvim

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66104

llvm-svn: 369481

show more ...

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I

Support tests in freestanding

Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".

Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:

In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:

self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']

Run the tests and they all fail.

Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).

Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.

The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.

The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:

https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed

This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.

Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.

<rdar://problem/47754795>

Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF

Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624

llvm-svn: 353086

show more ...

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that

Update more file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351648

show more ...

More constexpr algorithms from P0202. search/search_n

llvm-svn: 322566

Change (void) casts to TEST_IGNORE_NODISCARD, as requested by Eric. Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D40065

llvm-svn: 318804

Tolerate even more [[nodiscard]] in the STL. Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D39080

llvm-svn: 318277

[libcxx] Properly convert the count arguments to the *_n algorithms before use.

Summary:
The requirement on the `Size` type passed to *_n algorithms is that it is convertible to an integral type. Th

[libcxx] Properly convert the count arguments to the *_n algorithms before use.

Summary:
The requirement on the `Size` type passed to *_n algorithms is that it is convertible to an integral type. This means we can't use a variable of type `Size` directly. Instead we need to convert it to an integral type first. The problem is finding out what integral type to convert it to. `__convert_to_integral` figures out what integral type to convert it to and performs the conversion, It also promotes the resulting integral type so that it is at least as big as an integer. `__convert_to_integral` also has a special case for converting enums. This should only work on non-scoped enumerations because it does not apply an explicit conversion from the enum to its underlying type.



Reviewers: chandlerc, mclow.lists

Reviewed By: mclow.lists

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7449

llvm-svn: 228704

show more ...

Move test into test/std subdirectory.

llvm-svn: 224658